Geting Proper Port Area

Jeffdachef
5,000+ posts

Gunz That Turn on Nunz
Quoted from quentin jarrel, owner of dss

"So basically the 12-16 port area thing is just a simple guideline, The real method is to find the minimum square inches of port area.

Thiele Small's formula

dv = 39.37 (fb x Vd)^1/2

dv= minimum port diameter of vent in inches

fb= box tuninf frequency in hertz

vd= cone displacement in cubic meters (one way xmax in meters times cone area(SD) in meters)

for one BL 15

xmax= .018 meters

sd= .081 meters^2

tuning= 32 hertz (per you)

dv= 39.37 (32 x .018 x .081) ^1/2 (^1/2 means square root)

dv= 39.37 (.046656)^1/2

dv= 39.37 (.216)

dv=8.5 inch diameter port per sub

dv=56.72 square inches

for two BL 15's you need (2)dv. So you need 113.44 square inches of port or more."

 
Just looking for good discussions here. A definitive answer would be nice for once though.

So you know the minimum, but how do you know whats optimal and when to stop going too far?

Do you just forget about those port area per cubic feet ratios completely or do you just match how many cubic feet with how much power you are running along with the frequency response you are going for and keep the same minimum(or higher) port area?

Does port area really impact sound quality? AKA too much = sloppy and narrow bandwidth, too little = port compression, poor low end performance etc..
@hispls @keep_hope_alive @TaylorFade

Sometimes with some woofers on Winisd, they require unreasonable amounts of port area just to keep the M/s under 30 sometimes. Sometimes they turn out to be over 20+ sq inches of port area per cubic foot in their max recommended box size, which is fking trippy.
 
When I get back to a computer I can forward some links and papers on the discussion port sizing and flares sizing. your port is based on frequency response of the enclosure and excursion of the driver. what we care about is port velocity. once we know it we can predict chuffing or other noises. that is what determines the minimum port size. the size of the enclosure has nothing to do with port velocity. Frequency response matters because lower frequencies move for air. the lower your enclosure is expected to play, the larger your port needs to be.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

---------- Post added at 08:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:05 AM ----------

 

I have found port noise and port size and port velocity calculators that are a great resource. You can probably find them yourself with a few searches

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 
I've never found a straight answer for this myself,I use a combination of Torres and winisd.tweak this a bit until I get the results I want. Tuned in to see where this goes. Thanks for posting

loudspeaker design cookbook would be a great investment also!

 
good stuff, it's great to see some real calculation based on aerodynamics instead of guesstimation lol i guess those classes on aerodynamics and fluid dynamics are actually useful

wish more people would use references for books and whatnot like you have, sometimes i like to read up on topics in depth - even if ill personally never use it

 
I've been actually working on sound quality part of my system now, manual T/A, soundstage, new mosconi 4 channel etc... Been thinking of redoing the sub stage and was wondering about the port area and if my current one could be reduced for better SQ and maybe tune a little bit lower too. Lol funny how Sound quality led to a question asked by a lot of SPL guys.

 
I've been actually working on sound quality part of my system now, manual T/A, soundstage, new mosconi 4 channel etc... Been thinking of redoing the sub stage and was wondering about the port area and if my current one could be reduced for better SQ and maybe tune a little bit lower too. Lol funny how Sound quality led to a question asked by a lot of SPL guys.
For me SPL got old. It became only about how much money you spent. SQ takes way more understanding and ability to apply what you learn.

 
For me SPL got old. It became only about how much money you spent. SQ takes way more understanding and ability to apply what you learn.
Not once you get into the real high numbers. Or not if you actually attempt to experiment and stay in one class and do what you can. This is an old argument that I probably shouldn't have replied to, but I think we can both agree you can be successful without spending a lot to almost the same degree in either SPL or SQ.

 
Not once you get into the real high numbers. Or not if you actually attempt to experiment and stay in one class and do what you can. This is an old argument that I probably shouldn't have replied to, but I think we can both agree you can be successful without spending a lot to almost the same degree in either SPL or SQ.
You can if you do as you said but then daily enjoyment goes out the window.

You can nail SQ but not have much out put cheap.

You can nail SPL but not have much daily use cheap.

Depending on your idea of cheap

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

I would do as much as you can afford when you place your new speakers in if you cant do it all now. you can always pull your door panels off later...
2
380
Someone was telling me I need to have a battery isolator and some kind of DC to DC charger or do I run it directly off the main battery post pos...
3
1K
Yeah, saw that too, was like ??? wtf! They do know there stuff, I usually just roll with it!
13
900
You could try to make the port longer, but there might be other reasons with the box won't extend lower, or even the sub. You'd have to reverse...
3
598

About this thread

Jeffdachef

5,000+ posts
Gunz That Turn on Nunz
Thread starter
Jeffdachef
Joined
Location
South Coast Metro, CA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
27
Views
3,028
Last reply date
Last reply from
keep_hope_alive
pattern-wavelength.jpg

winkychevelle

    Apr 27, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
20221010_113336 (5).jpg

audiobaun

    Apr 27, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

Latest topics

Top