busniness law... must really be shitty if you're doing my work over that.yeah, business law sucks...but not as much as my calculus or stats 2 test tomorrow.
haha I'll give you my next 1... 2 more at the most haha... I think I can do this one, but I'm better off getting a pro to do it haha...
here they go:
"Suppose instead of putting your money into an RRSP, you invest in stock outside of an RRSP. You still deposited $5000.00 for 46 years making an average annual rate of return of 12%. The difference is that you had to pay 30% tax on the interest made every year to the government. How much do you have to spend at the end of 46 years?"
and Q2:
"Compare the amount of money you have after saving INSIDE an RRSP vs. having saved OUTSIDE the RRSP."
I did the same thing,I haven't ever encountered such a problem as in this question but this is how I would approach it. You are only getting 70% or the 12%, therefore a interest rate of 8.4%. However, something tells me this may not be correct. Your future value under this assumption is 204,322.87.
918330.58-204322.87 = 438508.54
Well, you are losing 1/3 of your previous compounding...I did the same thing,=5000(1+.12(.7))^46
but that number seems kinda low. Not sure if it's correct.
I have been wondering that too. That is why I did not even want to answer the questions. Thought it would have an impact on the formula or outcome of the questions. It's all Canadian I guess... I'm getting sick of how teachers, professors and instructors up here all assume that you are Canadian.btw what the hell is a rrsp?
That must be a canadian eqivalent to in the other case roth ira, but there is no investment plan like that where you pay taxes each year on growth. Just at the beginning or the end. Furthermore, most ( none I know) may taxes by selling securities (unless they sell poor ones to offset capital gains) And this explains why. You seriously injure your compounding multiple.Registered Retirement Savings Plan? not sure.