LESS THAN A LIVING WAGE
You want ME to prove YOUR claim that those low-wage jobs are just for people starting out and that they should move on? Are you asking me to prove that people age over time?
Well, people DO age over time. It's a fact unless you can prove otherwise. So the workforce will ALWAYS be aging, and people "starting out" will ALWAYS need to move on per YOUR stated rule of what those low-wage jobs are.
But I forgot you don't know what a "living wage" means.
It means enough to pay your bills needed to survive, and not go into debt doing so.
Unlike you, most people need more than just food and water. They don't get to live for free in someone's house. They require things like shelter, clothing, health care or health insurance, car insurance, personal care items,. Just to survive. All things that cost money.
People work in order to pay for stuff. Anyone who is working wants to be able to AT LEAST afford all their basic needs. And they shouldn't have to work more than full time just to survive.
Your answer to 74.09 million people who don't make a living wage: "get a better job".
My question (that you'll ignore, since it invalidates your "get a better job" solution):
WHERE are these multiple tens of millions of job openings that the lower-than-living-wage workers can just "get"?
Let's start small: Show me at least ten million available jobs in the US that they can just "get" at this time.
View attachment 61891