Current events discussion

That is a number from YOUR mind. Neither he nor I made that claim. However, show us the proof that 74.09 million people want to move to higher paying jobs.

Stop trolling.
Trolling, are we?

That's the number of people in the workforce who get paid a living wage.
YOU said those are jobs for people just starting out and that they should not stay in those jobs; just get a better job.

Show me the 74 million "better jobs" they should just get.

Back up your claims with facts, or you're just being a ******* troll.
RIGHT?
 
The defintion of "forced" is not showing me proof that someone was vaxed against their will or wore a mask against their will.
LOL... you are really trying to bend this. When you are demanded to do something against your will, that is called "being forced." It doesn't matter how you want to bend it, that is the definition. Take it to any English teacher, and they will agree with me.

Do you think a definition of "god" is proof that one exists?
Just because you say you're are intelligent, does it mean you are intelligent? You haven't proved that yet.

I fail to see the word "human" in there.
Can you highlight it, perhaps?
You said "baby." Were we not talking about a human baby, or is a baby not really a human as well?

Here, I'll REPEAT IT: " A ***** is not a living human until it is born. It is a *****."
It's not a living human. It's a ***** attached to the uterus of the woman carrying it. A human *****.

A living human is not the same as "human". It is "human" the second those human cells merge to create the single-celled zygote. Do you think a zygote is a living human? Do you think blastocytes are a living human?

Would you consider this "a living human"?
View attachment 61869
How about this?
View attachment 61868

"Called out"? You offered a definition of something to prove the existence of that something. That's not how it works.
Tell me that you think a zygote is "a living human".
Like I said before, you must have a really hard time reading simple instructions if you can't understand a simple definition. Maybe this will help you. It is actually "spelled out" for you by stating a ***** is a human. I quote "In recent years, modern medicine has revealed the truth about unborn babies, overwhelmingly confirming that an unborn baby is human. Even “Pro-abortion” biologists agree." Did you read that last part? "Even Pro-abortion biologists agree."

"answered that". With no proof? That's not an answer; it's just your claim.

If the shoe fits...
And if you dislike being called names, then maybe don't call others names?


How many times have I asked you to prove me wrong? Hundreds? Thousands?
If I asked you five questions right now that could prove me wrong, would you answer them, in order, with proofs, and without ad-hominem, circular references, or some form of "because I said so"?
Would you be willing to take that challenge right now?
Dude! I have provided you proof on everything. I have even admitted that you were right, at one point. You are the one that keeps digging around the facts to look for some stupid loophole to and refuse to admit when you are wrong. For example, you argue that a ***** is not human. I showed you every possible proof, but you insist on not admitting you're wrong. To admit you're wrong is not a bad thing. I actually helps you to become a more humble person.
Everyone could witness it, and you could make the post number part of your signature for posterity.
To be humble is to be happy.
 
Trolling, are we?

That's the number of people in the workforce who get paid a living wage.
YOU said those are jobs for people just starting out and that they should not stay in those jobs; just get a better job.

Show me the 74 million "better jobs" they should just get.

Back up your claims with facts, or you're just being a ******* troll.
RIGHT?
Yes, you are trolling.

Cool, so you say there are 74 million people making a living wage. Show me the proof that they ALL desire to move to a higher paying job. It's your claim, not ours.
 
Coming to a city near you:



that shit is actually terrifying for real

This is why the US is in a mad dash to find ways to bring down drones. All it takes is for a country to unload millions of those, that are packed with explosives, to do some serious damage. Even if we take out half of them, the damage would be extreme.
 
Remember a few months ago when Aurora Council members were saying there was no Venezuelan gang problems in our lovely sanctuary city? Just so you guys understand what Havana Street is like. Super high traffic 3 lanes in each direction. Super high population density, with miles long stretch of numerous car dealers, strip malls, a massive outdoor mall, Costco, restaurants, banks and apartment complexes. There would not only be a high number of adults along this thoroughfare, but kids as well. Havana is about a mile from office, and I frequent businesses in that area. Instead of a new subwoofer, should invest in body armor? And these f'ers are having a rolling gun battle like we're some 3rd world country. Where's the national guard? I hope Trump sends us some help when he takes office.

I frequent the park in the article, Great Plains Park. It's a great park for flying kites. And this isn't in a shyt neighborhood, it's in close to a military base, where you would find higher end homes, schools. Many of the residents would be military officers, lots of techs and engineers that work for the areospace/defense industry in that area, IT & healthcare professionals, etc.

 
This is why the US is in a mad dash to find ways to bring down drones. All it takes is for a country to unload millions of those, that are packed with explosives, to do some serious damage. Even if we take out half of them, the damage would be extreme.
For ww2 buffs, think how easy it would be to start firestorms with a fleet of drones.
 
Remember a few months ago when Aurora Council members were saying there was no Venezuelan gang problems in our lovely sanctuary city? Just so you guys understand what Havana Street is like. Super high traffic 3 lanes in each direction. Super high population density, with miles long stretch of numerous car dealers, strip malls, a massive outdoor mall, Costco, restaurants, banks and apartment complexes. There would not only be a high number of adults along this thoroughfare, but kids as well. Havana is about a mile from office, and I frequent businesses in that area. Instead of a new subwoofer, should invest in body armor? And these f'ers are having a rolling gun battle like we're some 3rd world country. Where's the national guard? I hope Trump sends us some help when he takes office.

I frequent the park in the article, Great Plains Park. It's a great park for flying kites. And this isn't in a shyt neighborhood, it's in close to a military base, where you would find higher end homes, schools. Many of the residents would be military officers, lots of techs and engineers that work for the areospace/defense industry in that area, IT & healthcare professionals, etc.

That's fckn stupid...I hope the boot gets put them...
 
Yes, you are trolling.

Cool, so you say there are 74 million people making a living wage. Show me the proof that they ALL desire to move to a higher paying job. It's your claim, not ours.
LESS THAN A LIVING WAGE

You want ME to prove YOUR claim that those low-wage jobs are just for people starting out and that they should move on? Are you asking me to prove that people age over time?
Well, people DO age over time. It's a fact unless you can prove otherwise. So the workforce will ALWAYS be aging, and people "starting out" will ALWAYS need to move on per YOUR stated rule of what those low-wage jobs are.

But I forgot you don't know what a "living wage" means.
It means enough to pay your bills needed to survive, and not go into debt doing so.
Unlike you, most people need more than just food and water. They don't get to live for free in someone's house. They require things like shelter, clothing, health care or health insurance, car insurance, personal care items,. Just to survive. All things that cost money.
People work in order to pay for stuff. Anyone who is working wants to be able to AT LEAST afford all their basic needs. And they shouldn't have to work more than full time just to survive.

Your answer to 74.09 million people who don't make a living wage: "get a better job".
My question (that you'll ignore, since it invalidates your "get a better job" solution): WHERE are these multiple tens of millions of job openings that the lower-than-living-wage workers can just "get"?

Let's start small: Show me at least ten million available jobs in the US that they can just "get" at this time.



1733935435373.png
 
LESS THAN A LIVING WAGE

You want ME to prove YOUR claim that those low-wage jobs are just for people starting out and that they should move on? Are you asking me to prove that people age over time?
Well, people DO age over time. It's a fact unless you can prove otherwise. So the workforce will ALWAYS be aging, and people "starting out" will ALWAYS need to move on per YOUR stated rule of what those low-wage jobs are.

But I forgot you don't know what a "living wage" means.
It means enough to pay your bills needed to survive, and not go into debt doing so.
Unlike you, most people need more than just food and water. They don't get to live for free in someone's house. They require things like shelter, clothing, health care or health insurance, car insurance, personal care items,. Just to survive. All things that cost money.
People work in order to pay for stuff. Anyone who is working wants to be able to AT LEAST afford all their basic needs. And they shouldn't have to work more than full time just to survive.

Your answer to 74.09 million people who don't make a living wage: "get a better job".
My question (that you'll ignore, since it invalidates your "get a better job" solution): WHERE are these multiple tens of millions of job openings that the lower-than-living-wage workers can just "get"?

Let's start small: Show me at least ten million available jobs in the US that they can just "get" at this time.



View attachment 61891
Nope, you aren't going to get out of this one by fast talk, misdirection or any of your other tactics. You said that we both claim there are 10's of millions of jobs for people to move too when we never made such a claim. You then provided some math in hopes that showing some math on the forum will cover up your lie that we both said 10's of millions of jobs. I pointed out to you that in order for your numbers to work YOU are assuming that all of these people WANT to move to higher paying jobs. That assumption is literally the only way your little "gotcha" moment works. So, show me the proof that all of the people used in your math want to move to higher paying jobs or **** off troll.
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,716
Views
445,677
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top