cheapest way to add time delay? any ideas?

I understand the math completely. 1ms per foot- got it. What I am referring to is way beyond that. Read the attachments that I posted if you have the time. I'm looking for how "cheaply" not why. I know why I want to do it, how with the tools that I have is the question. I need a cheap way to get an analog to digital converter and problem is solved. They make plenty of cheap ones ($20-$50) for ac but haven't found a dc- guess I could always use a converter for that to, lol.
If you understand the math then why are you trying to compensate for 6.86 meters. There is no physical way possible to have a speaker in your vehicle that is 22.5 feet off from your furthest speaker.

 
Even if you have this so-called "Haas" effect, why 20ms? You would have an echo at best, in that close of space.

When guys come in here swinging their SQ weiner around, I get a big laugh. I'm really into SQ myself, but I've found that less is more. Less processing = more SQ. There's a reason $6,000+ home theater setups use analog amplifiers with digital links, some even analog still. Manufactures like Alpine make big $$ by advertising a lot of products that promise huge gains, but the real test is by ear.

That's why I made my derogatory post earlier about using mathematics to try to achieve a starting point verses just using your ears and common sense (on axis tuning and phase selection). I'm a big fan of the common sense tuning method. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

If you're going to use the reflections of the car environment, ultimately you are going to have to play with driver placement and axis tuning. If you end up facing the drivers towards each other, you'll have a phase cancellation problem. If you face them off axis to each other, problem solved - usually. There's a whole list of ways to solve problems, but I just get a kick out of watching people try to beat their brains out with their tongue trying ideas.

 
hmmmmm, you guys didn't read the attachments did you? I guess thats why an acoustics engineer a few posts up has his rear delayed 20ms. I'm sure that you guy's know more about sq than he or I. I know I'm a little rusty because it has been 10yrs and there is still allot for me to learn but I didn't get a free ride just because I'm a nice guy. Quick question.... How many of you guys have full range speakers (coax or components) that you are using for rear fill? my point exactly. And if you don't get that- research it. Common sense and ears is how I came up with 20ms in 1997 when most people didn't know what time delay was and if you do some research you will see that it still holds true today. That is why I posted those links that I googled- it's free knowledge. BTW, why do you think that the pra-h400 is has up to 30ms of delay? I guess thats for a school bus. Another quick question. How many of you are over 20?

 
we're not trying to T/A the rear speakers to be in alignment with the other speakers in the car. we are trying to get the effect of a larger space with diffuse, filtered reflections. same as what you get in a room with a nice analog sound system. in a car, reflections are hard to come by due to standard driver spacing. the result is an effect where you are in a semi-anechoic chamber where everything is in front of you and nothing is behind you. in the 2 channel home audio world that only happens outside.

the home audio scene is on a different planet compared to car audio. i've heard home systems costing over $100k, ridiculous. but even those systems were in a room and that room had reflections - i.e. information from behind you. granted, if you're listening to Wilson Audio speakers they are very specifically placed based on the room.

point is, in a car, some people like the sensation that they aren't in a car. funny, i know. with speakers in the kicks you get better driver distances (relative to the seated position) but you also have sources below your feet. that is not something home audio has to contend with.

so, in order to have a "room" you have a few options. 1. buy a van and use apillar mounted mids/tweets. 2. buy a car and try to incorporate rear fill.

rear speakers are rarely properly used for "rear fill". i have long been a proponent for no rear speakers at all due to the added complexity and processing power required to make it work. fact is, when properly executed the results are amazing. a sound stage can increase in depth and width if properly executed rear fill is used. the problem is that it's very difficult and stock locations are rarely useful.

we all like something different. we shouldn't lambaste someone for liking something else. if someone wants to execute rear fill, more power to them. maybe you don't like it, STFU because it isn't your car or your money. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

all that said, i'm not set on the magical 20ms. I have been playing with settings on my H701, the rears are on the center out and the H701 is in 3ch PCM mode. I can't use the rear outputs because my front stage is 3-way active. luckily, i don't mind a mono rear fill, once it is properly eq'd, filtered, and delayed.

if you delay the rear speakers to the time setting relative to the driver distance separation - you end up with an image that is in your lap. it's not desirable. as the rear speaker information arrives at a later time, the sound stage is pushed away from you. but once you move away from perfect alignment you also start encountering phase interference. it's a delicate balance.

simple is better. mobile audio systems are far from "simple" way to many separate parts and pieces with horrible speaker locations and environments. i don't build car audio systems trying to get the most accurate representation possible - that is what 2 channel home audio is for. i invest time and money in car audio because i like listening to music while i drive. simple as that. i go the extra mile because it's a hobby that i enjoy and i like the challenge of working on a sound stage in such a fvcked up environment. but mostly, i like music.

 
it has been over 8 years since i've tried to incorporate "rear fill". i focused on the front stage and sub stage first. only after I got to an acceptable location, and i had the processing available, and i felt like spending more time working on it, did i add rear fill.

i still turn it off with some recordings. i don't always like it. but sometimes, i do. it's my car, my decision. you haven't heard my car, so you really can't comment on something you haven't experienced. if you've never heard rear fill properly executed, you won't be able to understand.

 
Thanks for clearing that up and sorry guys that I came off as a smart az. I shouldn't have came down to that level I was just tired of getting the same responses from guys that haven't even read the thread or the links. None of us are steve brown and we all have allot that we can learn. This thread is very informative not by me but by the 2 links and by other posters especially KHP. You just have to read and want to learn than assume that u know what you're talking about. KHA is right, its not a magic # but it is a good starting point and he explained it very well.

 
Thanks for looking out! That was alpines 1st time delay processor. It is almost identical to my pra-h400 except for the 400 is ainet and grey in color. I'm not positive but I'm pretty sure I would need a digital input for that 1 as well for the time delay. So if I can get am analog to digital converter I'll be set. Thanks again for looking out!

 
I actually did read the links and I follow the logic - I just don't agree with some of it.

I now see what the OP and Keep_Hope_Alive are trying to achieve. From the way you were talking, I was thinking you were trying to do time alignment at 20ms.

I agree, it will definitely make your car environment seem larger at those settings. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif I would feel like I was in a reverb room.

You guys would laugh at my idea of rear fill. (2) 6x9 Alpine 3-ways set to about 1/2 perceived volume when sitting in the driver's seat. They are off-axis to each other (about 35-degree angle) and in the upper C-pillars, ~15 feet behind my head in my VW Bus.

I completely agree with your points about home theater/audio verses car audio environments. I'm just hinting that you can duplicate the same type of "sound" for a lot less money in the CA world using similar techniques that are employed in home audio. I just would feel like the "room"/car was too big if I was trying 20ms for rear fill....echo effect. Personally, I don't like how much difference in volume between the rear and front are. That's why I reduce volume to avoid delay but keep a more front-faded sound stage. The rear fill is mostly to make it feel more like surround sound and less like a live performance. (more like listening to headphones)

 
I am holier than thou

hmmmmm, you guys didn't read the attachments did you? I guess thats why an acoustics engineer a few posts up has his rear delayed 20ms. I'm sure that you guy's know more about sq than he or I. I know I'm a little rusty because it has been 10yrs and there is still allot for me to learn but I didn't get a free ride just because I'm a nice guy. Quick question.... How many of you guys have full range speakers (coax or components) that you are using for rear fill? my point exactly. And if you don't get that- research it. Common sense and ears is how I came up with 20ms in 1997 when most people didn't know what time delay was and if you do some research you will see that it still holds true today. That is why I posted those links that I googled- it's free knowledge. BTW, why do you think that the pra-h400 is has up to 30ms of delay? I guess thats for a school bus. Another quick question. How many of you are over 20?
 
funny story, i was playing with my rear fill T/A last night, getting frustrated with the results, until i realized the vocalist had reverb on his mic. doh! kinda makes it hard to evaluate rear fill delay. i am getting what sounds like a larger interior volume, with extra "pop" in the vocals. it's pretty neat.

i have some anechoic recordings i may try out to see what "room effect" i am actually getting.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

corcraft

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
corcraft
Joined
Location
martinsville, va
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
123
Views
16,536
Last reply date
Last reply from
DidUHearThat?
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top