this.. I have a 360.4 running my mids and highs, I love it.. had it for 2 years and its never even gotten warm..The JL is a good amp. I don't understand why people are trying to talk you out of it. People who say "there is better for the money" are only saying it just because of the anti JL online cliche.
Yea it means it does rated at 4ohm and does not mention clipping or take into account clipping at all. Its a BS label they slap on to say hey our amps do rated when they actually dont..That mb quart is cea 2006 complient? Doesnt that mean it does rated
Well now u know.. Dnt even look for that fake payed for label anymore... DD, Sundown, IA, etc none are cea comp cause its BS....I never knew that, when looking at amps I always looked to see if they r cea complient
I dnt think anyone said JL was junk in this thread but for the same price if u can get a semi decent 4channel then yes I would take the 4channel over a 2 channel any day of the week.The JL is a good amp. I don't understand why people are trying to talk you out of it. People who say "there is better for the money" are only saying it just because of the anti JL online cliche.
I owned the best JL has had to offer and wont buy them anymore unless they are very good deals used so I can resell them... They arent a bad product but they where mid level at best so for the price they charge I wont recommend them to anyone if buying new...The JL is a good amp. I don't understand why people are trying to talk you out of it. People who say "there is better for the money" are only saying it just because of the anti JL online cliche.