burned cds = bad sound?

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

Originally posted by tglisson Let me put my two cent in lol

 

 

it could possibly be your "kbps" if you download mp3s if you have low kbps you have lower quality higher the better //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/greedy.gif.5a53e6246569d7ab79867170f3b06629.gif

We've already established that repeatedly. Why do you keep posting useless info?

EDIT: I mean, come on. You've been here less than 2 weeks and already have 200 posts? This can only mean two things: Either you know everything and have made numerous helpful replies, or are post whoring and making useless, uninformative posts. I don't know about everyone else but i'm leaning towards the second option.

 

[dave_3148 10+ year member]

yeah thats what i meant by all my stuff is 192 kbps

 

[tglisson 10+ year member]

Originally posted by dave_3148 yeah thats what i meant by all my stuff is 192 kbps

I have my good and bad mp3s, but half my mp3s at 128 are great, and i do believe burning slower will help your sq, but dont quote me, if i find proof ill post

 

[tglisson 10+ year member]

Originally posted by tommyk90 We've already established that repeatedly. Why do you keep posting useless info?

 

EDIT: I mean, come on. You've been here less than 2 weeks and already have 200 posts? This can only mean two things: Either you know everything and have made numerous helpful replies, or are post whoring and making useless, uninformative posts. I don't know about everyone else but i'm leaning towards the second option.

not to aruge but I didnt read anywhere in the thread about the higher the kbps the better quality just that some dudes list was all 190 kbps or whatnot, and most my replies are from arguing with people like you, that have to say something smart that does not really need to be said, I mean common people like you ruin posts getting off the subject then making others argue with you....

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/greedy.gif.5a53e6246569d7ab79867170f3b06629.gif

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

Originally posted by tglisson not to aruge but I didnt read anywhere in the thread about the higher the kbps the better quality just that some dudes list was all 190 kbps or whatnot, and most my replies are from arguing with people like you, that have to say something smart that does not really need to be said, I mean common people like you ruin posts getting off the subject then making others argue with you....

 

 

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/greedy.gif.5a53e6246569d7ab79867170f3b06629.gif

Its **** near impossible for any burned cd to sound as good as a real cd, but if you burn your cds slow and on quality CD-R's (verbatim, imation, pny, etc) you can come close to good SQ. Try downloading songs that have AT LEAST a 192 bitrate.

yeah my whole mp3 collection is at 192 but there are still some volume and background noise problems

what do yall download off off, i use winmx but still get bad quility at 192

yeah thats what i meant by all my stuff is 192 kbps

-this guy even posted to your comment.

 

[tglisson 10+ year member]

Originally posted by tommyk90 -this guy even posted to your comment. [/b]

wow bud think in the arugers prospective someone said they thought burning the cd slower wouldnt change the sq, so i say I believe it does, your just an ******* life would be better without people like you, and so would threads...

*as i unscribe to this useless thread thanks to tommyk90 that never had a say in the thread*

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/satan.gif.9c6a335ed7aeeed3ee273e573f1fcaac.gif

 

[Audio N00B 10+ year member]

192kpbs, not 190.

you're right tglisson, nobody said anything about that. they use the term "bitrate" instead but like you said nobody said anything about that in this thread. i think what tommyk was trying to say is that we've already been over this topic many times (MANY times) and that you didn't need to post useless information that everyone already knew.

then again, this topic could have been avoided if jeremythelen had used the search button.

EDIT: tglisson is making an *** out of himself *life would be better without people like you* what's that supposed to mean? i know hes not arguing with me..but c'mon don't post stupid things like that

 

[dave_3148 10+ year member]

i didnt even say some of those comments dipshit

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

Originally posted by Audio N00B 192kpbs, not 190.

you're right tglisson, nobody said anything about that. they use the term "bitrate" instead but like you said nobody said anything about that in this thread. i think what tommyk was trying to say is that we've already been over this topic many times (MANY times) and that you didn't need to post useless information that everyone already knew.

 

then again, this topic could have been avoided if jeremythelen had used the search button.

Thank you. It's not that i was trying to argue with him, it's just that he keeps posting useless stuff all the time. And i think the mods should put something on the main page for newb's to use the search button, but then again it's the mods job, and who knows about those guys. And i did have something to say in the beginning, all you said was stuff that was repeated earlier. So don't try to blame me for you unsubscribing to this thread, it's your own d*mn fault for posting useless shit everywhere.

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

Originally posted by dave_3148 i didnt even say some of those comments dipshit

I didn't say you said all of them, you said the last one but i couldn't make it look like you said just that one. Sorry, but i couldn't remember how to quote the names too.

 

[Brock 5,000+ posts]

wow, why dont you all just shut up?

conclusion:

Use good CD-R's, Use higher bitrates, and burn slow...

 

[Audio N00B 10+ year member]

I'd just like to add that burning slow probably will NOT effect the quality of the music.

However, it will reduce chances of pops/clicks in music but if you have a quality burner then this shouldn't be much of a problem.

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

Originally posted by Brock wow, why dont you all just shut up?

Good call, I'm just gonna stop arguing with him.

 

[tglisson 10+ year member]

Originally posted by Audio N00B I'd just like to add that burning slow probably will NOT effect the quality of the music.

 

However, it will reduce chances of pops/clicks in music but if you have a quality burner then this shouldn't be much of a problem.

I have a important q

why do clear cds you know the multi color kind you get a wally world (walmart) why wont my friends cd player accept it, i mean non clear ones accept so its cd-r but i was always curious abomut it cause mine doesnt do what his does, he has a older pioneer....

ty-

 

[Brock 5,000+ posts]

Originally posted by Audio N00B I'd just like to add that burning slow probably will NOT effect the quality of the music.

 

However, it will reduce chances of pops/clicks in music but if you have a quality burner then this shouldn't be much of a problem.

Actually burning slow will help out somewhat, it doesnt make a huge difference, but then again if your not in a hurry, you might as well go for it...