Building NEW ported box for my OLD Alpine gear

R1C3R

CarAudio.com Newbie
I’ve had some stuff laying around for years that was recently busted out to play with. It’s been fun and I’ve tried a couple different setups. I’ll give you a brief of what I’m working with.

Car is a 99’ Honda Civic sedan. Amp is Alpine MRD-M1005 (mono, 700w @4ohm, 1000w @2ohm). 4 gauge power & ground. Head unit is Alpine CDE-143BT. Sub is Alpine SWR-1241D (12” DVC 4ohm 300w RMS).

Okay now I’ll explain how it is currently. I have the sub wired to 8ohm so I’m assuming it’s getting 350w. It’s mounted inverted on a 1cubicFT wedge style sealed box. Honestly it sounds great and is setup to run it hard for a long period of time. However if I ever get a flat tire I’ll have to dismount the sub to even get to box out HAH. I could just switch back from inverted, but this box is going into my winter car using a different sub/amp/deck. So I’m going to create my own custom ported box.

Now I’ll mention I do already have all of the wood/screws/glue. LOL I’m repurposing and old entertainment center that has been unused at my mothers house for years now. It is 5/8”, but the top and bottom pieces will be 3/4”. Doubled up in front too.
As for box dimensions, it can be no taller than 15” and I’m going with 17” wide and 21” deep. This will give me the trunk space that I want and it’ll sit just behind the driver side rear seat, so when I fold down the passengers side rear seat (the smaller section) the box will not be in the way. Which is also right where the port will exit on the side out of the back of the box.

My calculation tell me it’s about 1.75 cubic ft. The port area is at a minimum of 21.7sq” which is tuned for 30hZ making it about 31.5” long & 1 7/16”x 13.75”

I’ve drawn up a rough draft... Let me know what you think. Am I missing something here? I believe it’ll work out perfectly for what I want. I listen to mostly newish rap & lots of different types of EDM, some hardcore/metal, and a bit of new-age indie/alternative.
Anyways I’m digging this old Type R. It’s like a daily beater you know, but I don’t think it’ll ever die. I love that my whole audio setup is exactly era specific to the car too. It’s my summer car. Gotta have my bumps!
6FA4B7C5-8A9D-4C36-9E3F-C4996D92560A.jpeg
 
Tune higher with your music choices nothing comes close to playing low 30hz range

I can always readjust the porting width and length to retune. Otherwise do you think my overall design will work well? I’m already thinking of new designs to draft. Maybe between 35-40hZ instead. Might redirect to port exit, I’ve heard to side of trunk works well.
 
Last edited:
I’ve had some stuff laying around for years that was recently busted out to play with. It’s been fun and I’ve tried a couple different setups. I’ll give you a brief of what I’m working with.

Car is a 99’ Honda Civic sedan. Amp is Alpine MRD-M1005 (mono, 700w @4ohm, 1000w @2ohm). 4 gauge power & ground. Head unit is Alpine CDE-143BT. Sub is Alpine SWR-1241D (12” DVC 4ohm 300w RMS).

Okay now I’ll explain how it is currently. I have the sub wired to 8ohm so I’m assuming it’s getting 350w. It’s mounted inverted on a 1cubicFT wedge style sealed box. Honestly it sounds great and is setup to run it hard for a long period of time. However if I ever get a flat tire I’ll have to dismount the sub to even get to box out HAH. I could just switch back from inverted, but this box is going into my winter car using a different sub/amp/deck. So I’m going to create my own custom ported box.

Now I’ll mention I do already have all of the wood/screws/glue. LOL I’m repurposing and old entertainment center that has been unused at my mothers house for years now. It is 5/8”, but the top and bottom pieces will be 3/4”. Doubled up in front too.
As for box dimensions, it can be no taller than 15” and I’m going with 17” wide and 21” deep. This will give me the trunk space that I want and it’ll sit just behind the driver side rear seat, so when I fold down the passengers side rear seat (the smaller section) the box will not be in the way. Which is also right where the port will exit on the side out of the back of the box.

My calculation tell me it’s about 1.75 cubic ft. The port area is at a minimum of 21.7sq” which is tuned for 30hZ making it about 31.5” long & 1 7/16”x 13.75”

I’ve drawn up a rough draft... Let me know what you think. Am I missing something here? I believe it’ll work out perfectly for what I want. I listen to mostly newish rap & lots of different types of EDM, some hardcore/metal, and a bit of new-age indie/alternative.
Anyways I’m digging this old Type R. It’s like a daily beater you know, but I don’t think it’ll ever die. I love that my whole audio setup is exactly era specific to the car too. It’s my summer car. Gotta have my bumps!View attachment 22962
I liked my type R better than the W6. It seemed a lot warmer or something. Answer me this, why do people double baffle the box, but then only install the sub on one layer of the double baffle. It makes zero sense to me. I would install it on top of the double baffle for more support.
 
why do people double baffle the box, but then only install the sub on one layer of the double baffle. It makes zero sense to me. I would install it on top of the double baffle for more support.
You'd think right?.. my sub enclosure is single ply baffled like you say above and I have no issues but its braced well and built right.. I use fairly thick #12 spax to hold the sub down and that's all it really needs mounted like it is. Now if it was a Zv5 on 5K mounter horizontally I'd have doubled up the mounting baffle /w/ a third to countersink. Most hi power enclosures I design are double thick with a triple baffle tho for peace of mind but available space dictates what will work.
 
Answer me this, why do people double baffle the box, but then only install the sub on one layer of the double baffle. It makes zero sense to me. I would install it on top of the double baffle for more support.
If the two layers of the baffle are properly coupled together, the stress will transfer to both layers even if the speaker is countersunk into the inner layer. Proper use of screws and glue should ensure this happens.
 
If the two layers of the baffle are properly coupled together, the stress will transfer to both layers even if the speaker is countersunk into the inner layer. Proper use of screws and glue should ensure this happens.
I've built houses for 30 years. There is no way in hell that I could tell an inspector that. The subwoofer is still only one piece of the double baffle. You can connect them any way you want. Bottom line is that the sub is only sitting on one piece of ¾". It's not getting the full 1-½" support. But, if it works for you guys, send it!
 
I've built houses for 30 years. There is no way in hell that I could tell an inspector that. The subwoofer is still only one piece of the double baffle. You can connect them any way you want. Bottom line is that the sub is only sitting on one piece of ¾". It's not getting the full 1-½" support. But, if it works for you guys, send it!
You don't need 1.5" to "support" the sub, you want it to prevent that panel from flexing and 'holic is correct that doubling up will add more rigidity to the baffle regardless of how deep you recess mount the driver..

Flush mounting often gains on the meter and looks nice.
 
I've built houses for 30 years. There is no way in hell that I could tell an inspector that.
Only the actual lip of 3/4" the driver is sitting on will experience the weakness due to thickness you are concerned about. And even that 3/4" thick portion itself is strengthened due to being coupled to the driver's frame, you are chasing ghosts.
 
Only the actual lip of 3/4" the driver is sitting on will experience the weakness due to thickness you are concerned about. And even that 3/4" thick portion itself is strengthened due to being coupled to the driver's frame, you are chasing ghosts.
Chasing ghosts? A sub sitting on 1-½" of MDF is going to be supported more than a sub sitting on ¾" of MDF. That's just common sense. It might look better, but technically will never be as strong. Everybody's an engineer these days.
 
I understand what you’re saying about it being mounted to 3/4 instead of 1.5 and how that’s inferior but like hispls said, it’s about reinforcing the baffle the sub is attached to. It does look better in my opinion as well.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

Build currently on hold, waiting on a custom voice coil. The former isnt tall enough for the new setup. On the plus side the motor has 3.25" of...
30
4K
Damn thats a lot of power. You built that whole thing with no BMS? A balancer is good to add of course but a bms is mandatory. I see people doing...
26
5K

About this thread

R1C3R

CarAudio.com Newbie
Thread starter
R1C3R
Joined
Location
Northern Michigan
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
27
Views
2,901
Last reply date
Last reply from
audioholic
Subwoofer remote.jpg

MrG

    Apr 18, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
20240416_012638.jpg

MrG

    Apr 18, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

Latest topics

Top