ATTN: Saddam - you're done

[PollyCranopolis 10+ year member]

http://www.commondreams.org/views/061700-102.htm

Texas has always had one of the highest capital punishment rates in the nation. This is long before Bush was Governer, and has continued years after he left the governership. I'll ask you again to back your arguments up with credibal sources. The New York Times is not one of them. They are widely considered to be one of the most openly bias, and anti-american news organisations in the country, to which has resulted in sales of their publication plumetting in recent years, to the point where talks of buy-outs and mergers have been widely discussed. You also fail to realize it is the people who appoint the states attorney, governers, etc, who then elect judges, and then to public defenders etc. The study done by columbia univeristy, was based on a national study of death penalty cases as well. The burden ultimately lies on the individual voter.

 

[PollyCranopolis 10+ year member]

Maybe you should pay a little closer attention of this "study", and read up on the election process of the Texas state goverment.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Texas has always had one of the highest capital punishment rates in the nation. This is long before Bush was Governer, and has continued years after he left the governership. I'll ask you again to back your arguments up with credibal sources. The New York Times is not one of them. They are widely considered to be one of the most openly bias, and anti-american news organisations in the country, to which has resulted in sales of their publication plumetting in recent years, to the point where talks of buy-outs and mergers have been widely discussed. You also fail to realize it is the people who elect the states attorney, governers, etc, who then elect judges, and then to public defenders etc. The study done by columbia univeristy, was based on a national study of death penalty cases as well. The burden ultimately lies on the individual voter.

you asked, i gave you some. 131 deaths were caused by Bush's inaction while he was Governor of Texas.

Sorry that America's Paper of record isn't good enough for you.

Now, kindly where are your links and sources for the statements in bold //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Ps.

sean hannity and bill orlly dont count //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

george bush only lead ~3000 soldiers to death in a pointless war with a country that posed no threat besides the ones we made up.

 

[PollyCranopolis 10+ year member]

you asked, i gave you some. 131 deaths were caused by Bush's inaction while he was Governor of Texas.
Sorry that America's Paper of record isn't good enough for you.

Now, kindly where are your links and sources for the statements in bold //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Ps.

sean hannity and bill orlly dont count //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Your saying that the these "131" deaths were on inoccent people? I see your a little high and mighty in your assumptions, considering you have no first hand knowleadge whatsoever regarding any of these cases. I guess none of these people actually murdered anyone, and were simply slaughtered as bi-products of a failed state run judicial system?

*At The New York Times Company, profit fell 69 percent, to $35 million, or 24 cents a share, down from $111 million, or 76 cents a share, in the first quarter of last year.” At The New York Times Company, profit fell 69 percent, to $35 million, or 24 cents a share, down from $111 million, or 76 cents a share, in the first quarter of last year.” http://newsbusters.org/node/4915#comment

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_luskin/luskin200410121013.asp

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2004/07/is_the_new_york_times_a_liberal_newspaper/

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-gross031403.asp

 

[BoomBoomBoy 10+ year member]

you asked, i gave you some. 131 deaths were caused by Bush's inaction while he was Governor of Texas.
Sorry that America's Paper of record isn't good enough for you.

Now, kindly where are your links and sources for the statements in bold //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Ps.

sean hannity and bill orlly dont count //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Go hug a birch //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

Your saying that the these "131" deaths were on inoccent people? I see your a little high and mighty in your assumptions, considering you have no first hand knowleadge whatsoever regarding any of these cases. I guess none of these people actually murdered anyone, and were simply slaughtered as bi-products of a failed state run judicial system?
*At The New York Times Company, profit fell 69 percent, to $35 million, or 24 cents a share, down from $111 million, or 76 cents a share, in the first quarter of last year.” At The New York Times Company, profit fell 69 percent, to $35 million, or 24 cents a share, down from $111 million, or 76 cents a share, in the first quarter of last year.” http://newsbusters.org/node/4915#comment

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_luskin/luskin200410121013.asp

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2004/07/is_the_new_york_times_a_liberal_newspaper/

well, you make the assumption that the people that saddam killed were innocent.

 

[SyKo13 5,000+ posts]

Sooooooooooooo, no video yet eh

 

[PollyCranopolis 10+ year member]

well, you make the assumption that the people that saddam killed were innocent.

I'm sure those women, children, and elderly had it coming to them.

 

[BoomBoomBoy 10+ year member]

well, you make the assumption that the people that saddam killed were innocent.

So you're implying those babies I saw gassed up in Kurdistan were guilty? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

 

[ndnbolla 10+ year member]

5min agohttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061230/ap_on_re_mi_ea/saddam_14

an adviser to Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said Saddam would be executed before 6 a.m. Saturday, or 10 p.m. Friday EST. Saddam and others were convicted of murder in the killings of 148 Shiite Muslims from an Iraqi town were assassins tried to kill Saddam in 1982.

so that would be:

10pm eastern time

9pm central time

8pm mountain time

7pm pacific time

all tonight

Incorrect. Yahoo already has it in EST.

 

[SyKo13 5,000+ posts]

Tits

sK

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

So you're implying those babies I saw gassed up in Kurdistan were guilty? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

i dont know, im just saying that the same people who were convinced that saddam had weapons of mass distruction and plenty of proof to back it up are making alot of accusations right now and seem to think they have plenty of proof. maybe things aren't just as they are broadcast to you. its easy to support something when you dont look at the other side. this dosen't just apply to saddam, this applies to everthing but it dosen't seem to matter.

 

[BoomBoomBoy 10+ year member]

i dont know, im just saying that the same people who were convinced that saddam had weapons of mass distruction and plenty of proof to back it up are making alot of accusations right now and seem to think they have plenty of proof. maybe things aren't just as they are broadcast to you. its easy to support something when you dont look at the other side. this dosen't just apply to saddam, this applies to everthing but it dosen't seem to matter.

Do you have a "#1 Saddam Fan" baseball cap?

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Your saying that the these "131" deaths were on inoccent people? I see your a little high and mighty in your assumptions, considering you have no first hand knowleadge whatsoever regarding any of these cases. I guess none of these people actually murdered anyone, and were simply slaughtered as bi-products of a failed state run judicial system?
*At The New York Times Company, profit fell 69 percent, to $35 million, or 24 cents a share, down from $111 million, or 76 cents a share, in the first quarter of last year.” At The New York Times Company, profit fell 69 percent, to $35 million, or 24 cents a share, down from $111 million, or 76 cents a share, in the first quarter of last year.” http://newsbusters.org/node/4915#comment

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_luskin/luskin200410121013.asp

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2004/07/is_the_new_york_times_a_liberal_newspaper/

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-gross031403.asp

Uh i never said they were innocent. I just said that his inaction as Governor caused their deaths. You keep trying to obfuscate the fact with subterfuge.

You cant possibly be trying to use the National fukkin review and OTB as unbiased sources.. both are admittedly conservative mouthpieces.. they don't even claim to present an unbiased opinion.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

also the star tribune just sold..

http://www.startribune.com/535/story/899047.html

for $530 million.. it was purchased for 1.2 billion only 8 years ago.

The entire idustry has taken hits.. not just the NYT.

 

[bigbangtheory 5,000+ posts]

You guys use such big words!!! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[AJ²06 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

Yess

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

 

[PollyCranopolis 10+ year member]

Uh i never said they were innocent. I just said that his inaction as Governor caused their deaths. You keep trying to obfuscate the fact with subterfuge.
You cant possibly be trying to use the National fukkin review and OTB as unbiased sources.. both are admittedly conservative mouthpieces.. they don't even claim to present an unbiased opinion.

How is carrying out a state mandated death sentence for a convicted murderer an "inaction"? Seems to me that many of these executed criminals brought death on themselves by A:commiting murder B:committing murder in state with a death penalty.

Your more than welcome to read through the articles and dictate anything you deem incorrect or constitues bias.