"her borders" huh
are you sure you know that the present day israeli citizens are the "true " jewish inhabitants that you speak of from the 1000 of years predating modern day palestine/israel?
think you can honestly trace these modern day israeli inhabitants to the through direct blood lines? or is it through ideological religious lines????? --folks can read that history for themselves.
and as far as international law, I never knew that one had to have a JD to read and decipher international law, and last I checked what should I post my degree as a scan or something would that make me more informed?
everyone has a right to a opinion, and I dont think it proper e-edicate to toss mine under the table since you dont really know my 'academic" credentials----as I do have them by the way
and while yes the US supports many countries, but NO outside country of such a small land mass (respectively) and no economic influence into american economics receives such a handout as modern day israel on a CONTINUOS basis---but maybe US citizens dont really need to worry about what our tax dollars are going
does canada support israel also economically, im just curious as I dont know too much about canadian international politics
and not like I agree with body mounted bombs in cafe's just like any other person not in the situation would think, but last I checked that wonderful military, and wonderful infrastructure that israel has was all funded by the us economy and european industrial businesses, or is there some other explanation as to how israel has ammassed so much wealth and technological acumen in 60 years.
war is war man, and those who are in it use whatever they have avaialable to them, hamas is wrong on certain accords, but so are the israelis. but you cant **** those who fight with guerilla warfare if thats the only medium they have.
and you REALLY think the infrasture (that the US and Europe funded) is okay for them to destroy, over the capture of one soldier, or is there a bigger issue. Why after all the rhetoric of the last 50 yrs do they decide to do this now? and there are no civilian casualties by the hands of israeli soldiers and missiles? cmon now
Terrorist jargon aside--as we all know that is easy to label anyone of muslim descent a terrorist and everyone jumps on the side of "they ****".
but Can it all be so one side to think that only the israelis are just and correct?
Where was it over the capture of one soldier? It's over the capture of several (4-7) and the continued murder of noncombatants. Destruction of infrastructure (note that they aren't hospitals or schools, but targets of legitimate military importance) is a perfectly acceptable action of war. For the last 50+ years, there have been daily attacks on Israel.
Yes, Canada supports Israel through aid, but we also support the Palestinians through aid. Interestingly enough, the Palestinians are the single most aid-dependant people on the face of the earth.
Israel's economy is heavily focused on the high-tech industry. Intel has major facilities, as does Motorola, and other high-tech companites. The economy, while obviously boistered by foreign aid, is driven by hard-working, determined, and intelligent groups of people who are focused on living their lives in the face of terrorism.
I'm not labelling Muslims are terrorists; that's the last thing I would do. I'm labelling terrorists as terrorists. Hamas is responsible for dozens of ******* bomb attacks over the years. Killing and injuring hundreds of civilians in Israel is defined as terrorism. They are not acts of war, they are not strikes on Israeli occupation or military installments, they are acts of terror, aimed at noncombatants. When these acts are supported by and directed by a governmental body, be it elected or otherwise, Israel has the right to defend herself from these attacks. The Hamas party has refused to a) recognize Israel, b) end terrorist attacks, or c) accept previous diplomatic agreements. How can you work with a government that refuses to work with you?
Acts of war such as cross-border incursions and attacks on non-combatants are certainly justification for reaction and attempts, by legitimate means, to reclaim their citizens. Citizens abducted by militants, not arrested by police for any particular crime.