What didn't you like about it? min didn't like the highs to much but killed the lows. Pretty much the same performance as the TC9 and RD Alpha I had in the same box.
Now, besides the fact that this is TOTALLY off base, and plain untrue, lets look into this a bit.. an improvment on WHAT side? well, the sq? is it better? i didnt think so. is the spl better? definatly not. now, why dont you go ahead and stop trying to post opinions as fact.
why the **** would I want my sub playing above 100hz, no why the fyck would you want that?If a sub can't play above 100hz without falling on it's face, it sucks //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
For that thuggin' *** midbass, nigguh.why the **** would I want my sub playing above 100hz, no why the fyck would you want that?
talking sh!t about a pretty sunset, blankets of opinions that are probably regrets..imo, the 15" si mag v3 i had was an overhyped POS. that was the last time i listened to ca.com reviews. I'm glad they moved on to the v4
Please do your research, the v4 mags are not recommended to be ran portedsorry guys had work..since the 12" only wants 1 cube sealed i figured i could fit 4 in my tl..maybe 3 ported