2.2 cubes before sub, port and wood displacement?
The new XXX's claim to fame is its extreme amount of excursion. The problem is, toss that sub in a small box and it will take a gob of power to get anywhere near the potential out of the sub. Id guess most car installs do not come close to having the power/enclosure volume to reach the sub's mechanical limits. This is especially the case if you plan to try and put the sub in a small ported box.
Lastly, if you want to go ported, why are you worried about trying to stuff a sub with so much excursion in your too-small space? Generally speaking, you get less cone motion in ported boxes than their sealed counterparts. Even in the proper sized ported box and rated power, that sub would rarely, if ever, play anywhere near mechanical limits. Vented systems rely much less on cone excursion to achieve high output levels than do sealed systems. So unless you plan on running it in a fairly large sealed box, with a large amount of power, I really dont see the need for all that cone excursion. Most of it would be wasted/never used in a vented setup.
Most any of the normal 'supersubs' would likely fit your situation better. The new XXX is just not a very good speaker for trying to cram into a small ported box.