I have to agree, even in a heavily deadened cabin it took like 2x power /w/ 20% more cone to gain 6 db and that was only after cabin work... lol. From 2-12s to a single 18. Nothing makes sense about the gains I enjoyed. 146ish to a solid 152 on less power with a touch more cone. My windshield, hood and wipers bore testament to the gains. Forget the rearview... I epoxied that and just watched the wipers jump and hood flex. Whether the dash was jumping was always a debate, too much debris falling down from the front of the headliner to tell anyway... lol. My sunshades were demo survivors... the wipers just slapped.In a silent sound room with no noise, 3 db (roughly 33%). In a car, about 10-15% Theoretical doubling of the sound to the ear requires more than an 8:1 ratio of power to realize a doubling of the volume to the ear. The math actually reads like this.
The ear perceives a doubling of the volume at roughly 9-10 db. Starting with a base line at 500 watts of input power, the math looks like this:
500 to 1000 watts, you get a 3 db gain or a 33% increase in volume.
1000 to 2000 watts, another 3 db gain or a 66% increase in volume
2000 to 4000 watts, another 3 db gain or a 99% increase, a doubling of the volume to the ear. That is a 8:1 ratio, in a perfectly quiet chamber with a mic placed 1 meter from the speaker.
So whether it’s the same wattage to a speaker that is 3 db more efficient or the same efficiency with increased power, the math applies either way. In a car environment, it will be much less that these results obtained in an sound testing room. Therefore, expect maybe a 15% difference all things being equal.
You are not even trying to grasp the information. Pearls before swine.
And your point is? I read that you touched on the logarithmic scale earlier in the thread.2 girls and 2 bottles coming from the shredder with resistance but no impedance and 2 girls and 2 bottles coming from The Christ with no resistance. Makes even the smartest humans in the world think twice and until 3 is too much.
Half the people will tell me I'm wrong.Come now; quit being a tease and just tell us. I'll tell you my take on it. Resistance is a set value, impedance is a reactive resistance.
Impedence changes as the cone moves tooHalf the people will tell me I'm wrong.
Impedance changes when frequency changes.
And it changes as power input changes too.Impedence changes as the cone moves too![]()
I saw that Doc. Brown's chart alludes to that.Impedance changes when frequency changes.