LOL. You forgot to say that's your opinion that is not backed by evidence or proof.So do a lot of the vaccinated.
LOL. You forgot to say that's your opinion that is not backed by evidence or proof.So do a lot of the vaccinated.
Only because the source is legitThey won’t even read it lol
Yeah, it’s super annoying. He’s just a hateful, useless troll.I am amused that even when Rob is given information, he ignores it and keeps asking the same questions over and over until someone bites and he can respond with his rehearsed verbal diarrhea.
CIA officials have admitted what the CIA does. The fact that they are former means diick.
I have read the Grant to the WIV.
I have read reports from the WIV
I have formed an educated opinion based on this information.
The virus came from the Wuhan lab.
You, Rob have done nothing except follow blindly and continue to think they way they tell you.
I am asking you to adhere to the same set of standards you demand of others.I am amused that even when Rob is given information, he ignores it and keeps asking the same questions over and over until someone bites and he can respond with his rehearsed verbal diarrhea.
"Have admitted" is a past event.CIA officials have admitted what the CIA does. The fact that they are former means diick.
There are no reports that indicate the virus came from the WIV lab, especially not reports from the WIV lab.I have read the Grant to the WIV.
I have read reports from the WIV
I have formed an educated opinion based on this information.
The virus came from the Wuhan lab.
You, Rob have done nothing except follow blindly and continue to think they way they tell you.
Who the fuck are you??? You're not asking shit. I have made no demands of anyone troll.I am asking you to adhere to the same set of standards you demand of others.
Why does that bother you so much?
Again you are focusing on something you want to argue about. You are irrelevant."Have admitted" is a past event.
"Former" CIA means they were there in the past.
YOU keep claiming the past is irrelevant.
YOU keep saying that the future can only be guessed, never predicted with any certainty (which if true, you gave up an easy $1,000 in a wager).
So which is it? The past is relevant, or it's not? The future can be predicted, or it can't?
Pick your stance.
Because you have not read the material it must not exist.There are no reports that indicate the virus came from the WIV lab, especially not reports from the WIV lab.
If they admitted it, the US gov't and media would be all over it like flies on shit.
So, you are blindly accepting something you read or heard somewhere, without doing your own hands-on research to form your opinion.
Yet, you have a strong distaste for blind acceptance.
I don't read either.And no, Zerohedge and Epoch times are not "US Media". They both seem to be communist propagandists, if anything.
Weird how you consider a quest for truth and fact to be "ugly hate".Aren’t you Rob? Show us more of your ugly hate that you can’t keep inside…
When are you going to admit you are wrong about all viruses being natural?Weird how you consider a quest for truth and fact to be "ugly hate".
Is that why you despise science? Because they strive for truth and fact?
When the phuck have you been on a quest for either. When either has been presented to you it is ignored or argued immediately.Weird how you consider a quest for truth and fact to be "ugly hate".
Is that why you despise science? Because they strive for truth and fact?
Then why express distaste of blind acceptance. If you don't like it, then you obviously want others to not do it.Who the fuck are you??? You're not asking shit. I have made no demands of anyone troll.
You simply refuse to ever answer any question that will show you are wrong, or don't know what you are talking about.Again you are focusing on something you want to argue about. You are irrelevant.
So it's knowledge that YOU carry, but no one else anywhere has figured it out and blown it wide open the to the world?Because you have not read the material it must not exist.
..I don't read either.