What is?

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You know Rob, this is the statement you made to me to which I said

To stay on track:
You expressed anger that I just blindly accept info. If that bothers you, then you obviously have a higher standard. The only higher standard would be investigating and directly obtaining the evidence from the source.
HAVE YOU?

So, are you going to speak to the challenge you posted and that I answered handily?
If not, then you are saying your questions are meaningless and any future complaints of people not answering your questions should just be ignored.

And tell us: Do you want your questions answered, or does it not matter?
Also, please speak to the suggestion that I'm full of shit, and the multiple examples of false information you post:

• #17,444

Strike a deal: Prove you never asked the question before. We both know you have.
Is four posts enough for me to prove it?

You wanted a false statement of yours? How about six?
Regarding the SPR: "Biden's use was not legal"
Regarding mathematics: "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means"
Regarding female orgasm: " The female orgasm exists to stimulate ovulation."
Regarding electronics: "A mono amp CAN be bridged."
Regarding anatomy: "Get it right, there are no nerves IN bone."
Regarding law: "You said YOU prosecute people commiting fraud. If you are not an attorney then you lied."

All verbatim quotes of your words. All incorrect.


If you are upset that I just "blindly accept" the results of investigations that others have performed, then logic dictates that you do not "blindly accept" the results of investigations that others have performed. That leaves only one option: You performed your own investigations.

So, tell us about the investigations you performed, since you were not part of any of the government groups that investigated.
If you didn't do any, then you are demanding of others what you are unwilling to provide yourself.
That's hypocritical.

So before we totally go off the rails, tell us about your hands-on investigation that you did in order to not blindly accept info from someone else.

No Rob, that is the track. You are also the one who said I am angry. I am not angry nor can you tell my emotions through your granny's magic computer. You are not going to suddenly make yourself right by posting a bunch of past post from past topics that have nothing to do with the fact that the CIA will certainly LIE about what they find. It is NOT in their best interest to disclose the truth to the general public. But you keep on fishing for something else Rob.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

See folks, this how a bullshitting troll works. Saying I post nothing but conspiracy theory and conjecture is a flat out lie.

Prove the virus is natural.

All viruses are natural. Since the dawn of life.
There is nothing so far that proves the 19 variant was man-engineered in a lab.

That leaves us with nature, unless you have something other than nature.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

All viruses are natural. Since the dawn of life.
There is nothing so far that proves the 19 variant was man-engineered in a lab.

That leaves us with nature, unless you have something other than nature.

Stop making definitive statements.

There is nothing so far.... there is nothing you are willing to accept is what you mean.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

All viruses are natural. Since the dawn of life.
There is nothing so far that proves the 19 variant was man-engineered in a lab.

That leaves us with nature, unless you have something other than nature.

Prove the virus is natural.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

There is nothing so far that proves the 19 variant was man-engineered in a lab.

There's nothing that proves natural evolution either...

 

[djdilliodon!]

Hearing Wrap Up: Suppression of the Lab Leak Hypothesis Was Not Based in Science - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

oversight.house.gov

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Hearing Wrap Up: Suppression of the Lab Leak Hypothesis Was Not Based in Science - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

oversight.house.gov

They won’t even read it lol

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

ROBGMN!!!! When it is admitted that the SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 was lab engineered, how will your life change?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You know Rob, this is the statement you made to me to which I said

No Rob, that is the track. You are also the one who said I am angry. I am not angry nor can you tell my emotions through your granny's magic computer. You are not going to suddenly make yourself right by posting a bunch of past post from past topics that have nothing to do with the fact that the CIA will certainly LIE about what they find. It is NOT in their best interest to disclose the truth to the general public. But you keep on fishing for something else Rob.

So to the track: What type of hands-on investigation have you completed in order to reach your conclusion?

And yes, people can absolutely determine your emotions by what you post. The written word is pretty amazing.
"posting a bunch of past post from past topics" (verbatim quote of your words)? You ask me to prove soemthing your or I said, but when I prove it, you complain.
How in the world am I supposed to prove something you or I posted without quoting "past post"s?
The past really DOES matter when you ask someone to prove what happened in the past.

And, though you are griping that the past is not relevant to things, you are saying "CIA will certainly LIE about what they find."
How do you know this? Is it based on past behavior? That would be weird if the past isn't relevant.
Since the past isn't relevant, it must be a prediction of the future, which you claim is not possible even when statistics indicate the prediction has very high odds.

So which is it: The past is not relevant, or the past is relevant. The future cannot be predicted or the future can be predicted.
You can't have both things both ways.
Make up your mind.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

All viruses are natural.

Wrong, and you’re a f*cking imbecile for thinking that:

“But scientists in the Netherlands have genetically engineered a much more contagious airborne version of the virus that quickly spread among the ferrets they use as an experimental model for how the disease might be transmitted among humans.”

Containing the Risks of Bioengineered Super Viruses

cisac.fsi.stanford.edu

“Since the 1970s, researchers have engineered superbugs. While this research could help us prepare for future outbreaks, the stakes of this work are extremely high: if even one dangerous virus escaped a lab, it could cause a global pandemic.”

What happens if an engineered virus escapes the lab?

Since the 1970s, researchers have engineered superbugs. While this research could help us prepare for future outbreaks, the stakes of this work are extremely high: if even one dangerous virus escaped a lab, it could cause a global pandemic. So, what can we do to minimize risk? And is the...

ed.ted.com

“Viruses are generally modified so they can be used as vectors for inserting new genetic information into a host organism or altering its preexisting genetic material.”

Genetically modified virus - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

F*cking useless dipshit troll.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

ROBGMN!!!! When it is admitted that the SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 was lab engineered, how will your life change?

If it is proved that the virus mutation was lab-engineered , then I will have a new piece of information and understanding about the virus.

But you wanted to stay on track. Can you meet your own wishes, and stay on track?
The track we were on regarded your distaste for accepting info blindly, and being force-fed info.

Given this distaste, what is your hand/s-on experience in determining the source of the virus mutation?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So to the track: What type of hands-on investigation have you completed in order to reach your conclusion?

What hands-on investigating have YOU done?

And yes, people can absolutely determine your emotions by what you post. The written word is pretty amazing.
"posting a bunch of past post from past topics" (verbatim quote of your words)? You ask me to prove soemthing your or I said, but when I prove it, you complain.
How in the world am I supposed to prove something you or I posted without quoting "past post"s?
The past really DOES matter when you ask someone to prove what happened in the past.

You can't actually, you can guess at best. Still trolling with your lack of knowledge of the word verbatim and your denial of the definition of said word. You are on a roll... troll.

And, though you are griping that the past is not relevant to things, you are saying "CIA will certainly LIE about what they find."
How do you know this? Is it based on past behavior? That would be weird if the past isn't relevant.
Since the past isn't relevant, it must be a prediction of the future, which you claim is not possible even when statistics indicate the prediction has very high odds.

Because former CIA officials have stated they will engage in these things including misinformation and LIES. It's literally part of their jobs.

So which is it: The past is not relevant, or the past is relevant. The future cannot be predicted or the future can be predicted.
You can't have both things both ways.
Make up your mind.

You are not relevant.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

@RobGMN this is how unbelievably f*cking retarded you are:

“The microbiology toolbox includes techniques to induce mutations in viruses that give the microbes new powers. Scientists perform these manipulations for many reasons, including wanting to understand how the microbes evade detection by our immune systems. But adding capability to a pathogen carries obvious risks, especially if this “gain of function” involves enhanced virulence or infectiousness. Escape from a lab, by accident or design, is a possibility. So why do it? Some researchers argue the work can offer a peek at what a virus can do before it goes into the natural world and poses a threat to people.”

Why Scientists Tweak Lab Viruses to Make Them More Contagious

Some “gain of function” studies explore how a dangerous pathogen might cross species barriers to start an outbreak. They are not without controversy

www.scientificamerican.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If it is proved that the virus mutation was lab-engineered , then I will have a new piece of information and understanding about the virus.

But you wanted to stay on track. Can you meet your own wishes, and stay on track?
The track we were on regarded your distaste for accepting info blindly, and being force-fed info.

Given this distaste, what is your hand/s-on experience in determining the source of the virus mutation?

This is your track clearly as you keep trying to pound it home how much you NEED to discuss your view on blindly accepting and being force fed information. You are a moron.

It is very well known what the CIA does. Cover-ups, propaganda, lies and so on. Yet YOU want to blindly accept what they have given you as fact. That makes you naive to say the least. It's not my distaste or anger or anything else. It's me not be blind like you and just accepting what you are told.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Rob is a virus, prove me wrong.