What is?

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You can call it whatever you want, but attacking the sources of news I post doesn’t disprove what I share, nor does it means the information in the news I post is a conspiracy theory. Yes, it’s still just your opinion, and you and Rob are the only two who seem to have a problem with what I post, while most others on here don’t immediately discount everything that doesn’t say what you want it to. You msm media drones just use the labeling of me as a conspiracy theorist to discredit anything you don’t like. It’s easy to call something or someone as a conspiracy theorist to not actually have to debate information, isn’t it?

I accept that it doesn't disprove what you share. I actually followed that last article and it's legit. Here's the issue though, when the vast majority of crap coming from that source is conspiracy theories and click bait headlines to articles that don't support the premise of the headline, I'm not even interested in clicking on the link and then vetting article 3 times over because the source isn't trustworthy.

If I start quoting Rachel Maddow 5 times a day are you going to click on all the links and vet them? And after about 5 days of that crap and figuring out that Rachel is misleading you or has no evidence to support her claims 80% of the time, wouldn't you just ignore Rachel Maddow links?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

How is it that as soon as Jimmi is done typing RobGMN starts typing? Ya'll notice that?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I accept that it doesn't disprove what you share. I actually followed that last article and it's legit. Here's the issue though, when the vast majority of crap coming from that source is conspiracy theories and click bait headlines to articles that don't support the premise of the headline

Just your opinion, again

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

LOOK HE IS TYPING ON TWO COMPUTERS AT THE SAME TIME!!!

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Just your opinion, again

Then your just denying the reality of what zerohedge is.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Then your just denying the reality of what zerohedge is.

You're*

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Then your just denying the reality of what zerohedge is.

I’m not caring of your opinion of what zerohedge is.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The sad thing is... who is gonna want to get together for a Caraudio.com meet. All this fighting and bickering because the wrong guy is in the White House.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What hands-on investigating have YOU done?

As I said before, I haven't done any, nor can I do any. Like a million other things in life, I have to rely on the data gathered by others.
I never went to the moon, but I can use the data gathered by others to tell you what it is like.
I never measured the circumference of the earth, but I can rely on the data calculated by others to tell you the mileage.
I never did a study of the efficacy of acetaminophen on a cluster headache, but I can find out what it is from the studies of others.
This isn't blind acceptance, though you might claim it is.

To stay on track: You have a distaste for blind acceptance. So, what hands-on work have you done to reach your conclusion?

You can't actually, you can guess at best. Still trolling with your lack of knowledge of the word verbatim and your denial of the definition of said word. You are on a roll... troll.

Says the guy who "knew" the results of a fight before it happened. You sure it wasn't a "guess at best"?

Because former CIA officials have stated they will engage in these things including misinformation and LIES. It's literally part of their jobs.

"Former" indicates the past.
These people do not even work for the CIA now, but YOU know based on past events what the CIA will do in the future.
Seems like a guess, at best.

You are not relevant.

We are all relevant in some way. Some more than others.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

As I said before, I haven't done any, nor can I do any. Like a million other things in life, I have to rely on the data gathered by others.
I never went to the moon, but I can use the data gathered by others to tell you what it is like.
I never measured the circumference of the earth, but I can rely on the data calculated by others to tell you the mileage.
I never did a study of the efficacy of acetaminophen on a cluster headache, but I can find out what it is from the studies of others.
This isn't blind acceptance, though you might claim it is.

To stay on track: You have a distaste for blind acceptance. So, what hands-on work have you done to reach your conclusion?



Says the guy who "knew" the results of a fight before it happened. You sure it wasn't a "guess at best"?
View attachment 51439




"Former" indicates the past.
These people do not even work for the CIA now, but YOU know based on past events what the CIA will do in the future.
Seems like a guess, at best.



We are all relevant in some way. Some more than others.

Seriously, what are you so angry about?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Seriously, what are you so angry about?

Seriously: Why do you always tapdance away the moment you have to walk the walk?

Can't you answer the simple question of what hands-on investigating you have done in order to form your opinion that the virus was lab-mutated?
*Hands-on being required in order to not just be blindly accepting of others' info?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

She died way too young.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I am amused that even when Rob is given information, he ignores it and keeps asking the same questions over and over until someone bites and he can respond with his rehearsed verbal diarrhea.

CIA officials have admitted what the CIA does. The fact that they are former means diick.
I have read the Grant to the WIV.
I have read reports from the WIV
I have formed an educated opinion based on this information.

The virus came from the Wuhan lab.

You, Rob have done nothing except follow blindly and continue to think they way they tell you.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

She died way too young.

So do a lot of the vaccinated.