What is?

[ThxOne Premium Member]

What he saw 3-4 years before the incident.
That would be "in the past" now, and "in the past" on the day patient zero got sick.

You consider the past irrelevant. Why is it suddenly relevant when you want to use it to prove your opinion?

Ok, clearly you are just being a cock sucker. You spoke for me as you always do about relevance and now you are just being a cock sucking troll.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

That's fine, but then don't "ask" to debate stuff based on Zerohedge article because 9 out of 10 times I'm not going to bother to click the link, Rob will probably dismiss it, etc.

Don’t care.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I'll freely admit I ignore bullshit.

Except when you don't...

Sometimes you go full send with it

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

@RobGMN read this and tell us what you think.

Is there a transcript? This page just has a short list of questions asked or statements made by 5 Republican representatives.
There's not enough info here (none, actually) to say that the theory of the lab creation and leak is correct.

"Information gained from this hearing will help the Select Subcommittee conduct further investigations" seems to be the primary result of the hearings.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Ok, clearly you are just being a cock sucker. You spoke for me as you always do about relevance and now you are just being a cock sucking troll.

Why are you so angry?
You expressed distaste for blind acceptance, so I tried to hold you to your own standard of not blindly accepting.

What hands-on work did you do with the lab, the workers, the virus, etc, to avoid blind acceptance in forming your opinion?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Is there a transcript? This page just has a short list of questions asked or statements made by 5 Republican representatives.
There's not enough info here (none, actually) to say that the theory of the lab creation and leak is correct.

"Information gained from this hearing will help the Select Subcommittee conduct further investigations" seems to be the primary result of the hearings.

@djdilliodon! you see this shit?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Why are you so angry?
You expressed distaste for blind acceptance, so I tried to hold you to your own standard of not blindly accepting.

What hands-on work did you do with the lab, the workers, the virus, etc, to avoid blind acceptance in forming your opinion?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Why are you so angry?
You expressed distaste for blind acceptance, so I tried to hold you to your own standard of not blindly accepting.

What hands-on work did you do with the lab, the workers, the virus, etc, to avoid blind acceptance in forming your opinion?

When are you going to admit you are wrong about all viruses being natural?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Secretary Rob must be hard at work lololol

 

[djdilliodon!]

• Former NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and Former NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins were directly involved in the drafting, publication, and public promotion of Proximal Origin — a paper written to suppress the COVID-19 lab-leak hypothesis.

• There was a coordinated effort between public health officials in the United States government and expert scientists to craft a narrative that would advance the zoonotic origin of COVID-19 in order to protect the Chinese government from any potential criticism and repercussions.
• The conclusions drawn by the co-authors of “Proximal Origin” rest on insufficient evidence, draw inaccurate assumptions, and have never been proven or verified by the wider scientific community.
• Dr. Kristian Andersen confirmed the U.S. funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology fell below recommended bio-safety markers.
• Scientific integrity was abandoned by Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, and the co-authors of Proximal Origin in favor of political expediency. Suppressing a legitimate scientific theory to advance the preferred narrative of senior government officials is egregious and must be fully investigated.
• There is still more work to be done to hold public health officials accountable for their actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Select Subcommittee emphasizes its outstanding request for transcribed interviews and documents from Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins.

I think this is a pretty good amount info here imo

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Notice how everything that is being posted he has an immediate response to discredit the post. He has no other goal here. Nobody likes him, nobody wants him here so TROLL ON!!!! He is a loser.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Except when you don't...

View attachment 51441

Sometimes you go full send with it

Even djdillodon (who doesn't agree with me) has shown you got this entirely wrong.
Even Thxone (who REALLY doesn't agree with me) crushed you by crying fould when I say a word-for-word transcription in quotes is verbatim.
These words are not in quotation marks. Why you consider them a quote can only be answered by you, since NO ONE else has stepped up to support that YOU see quotation marks. Maybe crumbs on your phone screen? Floaters in your lacrimal fluid? Mites on your glasses?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Even djdillodon (who doesn't agree with me) has shown you got this entirely wrong.
Even Thxone (who REALLY doesn't agree with me) crushed you by crying fould when I say a word-for-word transcription in quotes is verbatim.
These words are not in quotation marks. Why you consider them a quote can only be answered by you, since NO ONE else has stepped up to support that YOU see quotation marks. Maybe crumbs on your phone screen? Floaters in your lacrimal fluid? Mites on your glasses?

You refuse to say why you even posted that statement. You gonna grow some balls?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Even djdillodon (who doesn't agree with me) has shown you got this entirely wrong.
Even Thxone (who REALLY doesn't agree with me) crushed you by crying fould when I say a word-for-word transcription in quotes is verbatim.
These words are not in quotation marks. Why you consider them a quote can only be answered by you, since NO ONE else has stepped up to support that YOU see quotation marks. Maybe crumbs on your phone screen? Floaters in your lacrimal fluid? Mites on your glasses?

I left floaters in your mom’s eyes

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

By the way Rob the vitreous humor is the liquid that floaters in the eye are in.