I am not ashamed to admit that I am a Dayton ultimax nut hugger. Iād take the Pepsi challenge with these subs against any sealed subwoofer on the market. I had my 8 inch Dayton in a 4th order and even the single 8 was impressive.
This box is pretty big for 10ās. Like the biggest Iāve ever done, I suspect. These subs are well designed. This is one of those boxes I oversized somewhat, in attempt for flatter and low response, on the sealed side. Dude, these subs resonate lower in sealed than some 18ās do, and their low resonance and box size matches up with a great Qtc. These subs are very well designed.
Iām gonna stop before I give away too much secret sauce haha. 4ths- you have to have the right sub. Even in subs that work in or have recommended sealed, those subs arenāt always the best for a 4th bandpass. It just depends on the frequency response people want. I can tell who knows how 4th order bandpasses work by how they talk about it.
Ratios donāt matter!!! Thatās not how it works lol. It kills me inside some, and it makes me feel better, at the same time. 4th order bandpasses can be SOOOOO musical. Or they can be SPL monsters. I prefer series 6th orders over 4th order bandpasses in many situations, especially at a certain power level per woofer.
If somebody wants to explain how they know ratios matter, then go for it. Thatās just a great way to not get what you really want.
āTis frustrating when I see people say āI want a X:1 ratio 4thā, like that says anything about how itāll play. My customers havenāt
done that; Iām just talking about what I see online. Iām not gonna name names, but thereās people who have some of the biggest systems and their 4th order b-pillar is designed via a ratio thought process. I wish theyād let me design it. Iāve seen the response graphs, aka the dBās across their bandwidths. Iāve literally seen like 5-10 dB drop offs on musical boxes within an octave of peak
