I think the problem here is that while the loudest talking heads are full on hypocritical about it, especially when it's filtered through the media, that doesn't mean that everyone under the Democratic roof is hypocritical. Tara Reed's accusations against Biden should have been disqualifying, What Bill Clinton did to the 3 women including Monica should have been disqualifying as well as his relationship with Epstein. What Trump has admitted to in numerous forms in reference to being a creep, as well as his relationship with Epstein should be disqualifying.
A large portion of the problem is in the media, because it makes democrats look like hypocrites when they don't attack their own. Indiemedia still does, but they don't have advertisers on their *** whenever they start poking the powerful bears that those same companies have invested years and millions of dollars into bribing into their circle. Most politicians are nothing more than investments by companies. Once you look at politics through that lens a lot of the bullshit that media figures do starts to make sense.
Biden has no standards for fairness, no, but he's also not a criminal mastermind. The DNC shows their colors every single time, they never get away without the truth being released, it's just the media doesn't care when it eventually is. The issue in Trump's conspiracy theory is predominantly
A) that his supporters are more likely to commit voter fraud
B) that grand schemes are horribly kept secrets when they involve hundreds of people let alone tens of thousands like this one.
C) That evidence is required in court. Without evidence you have no standing, without standing you have no case. For a man who's filed hundreds of lawsuits he's sure pretty retarded when it comes to the law. "Eye-witnesses" have been proven to be idiot zealots, hardly worthy of any trust and that's all he has. They also can't seem to put their best foot forward and their credibility is in the toilet as a result.
There are well respected libertarian and republican lawyers who think Trump's cases are complete and utter embarrassments for the country that stood no chance of success. The difference between them and Trump is that they listen to their law intuitions more than they listen to the koolaid they've all drank. It's like how on NCIS the layperson might believe that hacking looks like a bunch of code passing by on a konsole window and that you combat it by typing tons of code back, but a security expert would look at that and roll their eyes at the stupidity of it. What we've got here is an issue of a bunch of laypeople making conclusions based on what other laypeople say because it reinforces their world view.