*** With A Sibling - Wrong? (consensual, good read)

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

Been there, done this. In fact, I prefer them to sheep.

A man who knows his farm animals, impressive. The less civilized among us will run around sticking their peters in any old barn animal.

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

No, it doesn't happen in Canada very often as far as I'm aware of.

I think it is impossible to tell if the goat consented. Now suppose you bent over and the goat mounted you without your guidance. That would be a bit different.

Those emotional circumstances are the risks the partners must accept, though, in the same way that we accept them every time we "risk" having *** with another person (personally, I am not nearly as emotionally attached to sexuality as some here seem to be).

Like I said, I think there is definitely something "different" about being attracted to a family member on that level, but I can't explain why or how it could be considered wrong.

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

I literally LOVE that I have to justify to you the fact that it is wrong for you to let your brother bang your ***.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Then do it.

He, and now I, are waiting for your thorough and logical explanation. Why is it wrong? Because you were told so? Your religion tells you this? Your laws prohibit this?

None of those are logical reasons as to why.

I won't say I disagree with your stance. I will just say I dare you to prove yourself right.

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

I literally LOVE that I have to justify to you the fact that it is wrong for you to let your brother bang your ***.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Everything that is "wrong" must be proven so, and continously, to ensure that what we are teaching is actually wrong and not indoctrinated garbage. The same principles apply to fields outside of morality as well.

 

[mcsoul 10+ year member]

Everything that is "wrong" must be proven so, and continously, to ensure that what we are teaching is actually wrong and not indoctrinated garbage. The same principles apply to fields outside of morality as well.

OK, I'm going to stop judging you guys on your preferences.

Your free to bang family members as soon as we can re-write

these archaic state laws.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

I think it is impossible to tell if the goat consented.

You obviously have not spent a lot of time around goats.

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

The only reasoning I can see for this being wrong is due to society's judgement. Its pretty obvious that society isn't always a good judge of what is right or wrong.

Who knows, maybe throwin a couple loads into your sister before branching out to real world tang is the way to go...many of us will never know because society tells us not to...

 

[bass-aholic 10+ year member]

I don't have a sister, so you'll have to take what I say with a grain of salt.
No, I don't believe that *** with a sibling is wrong. I agree that producing damaged offspring is somewhat irresponsible, but if the goal is not procreation, and both parties are consenting, then I see no reason why I can factually say "That is wrong".

You would probably think otherwise if you had a sister. i would shoot myself before doing that kinda thing...extended family is wrong enough, but i mean come on your sister? People must be fucking desperate these days. Bone a fat chick instead.

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

come on your sister

thats the spirit

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

OK, I'm going to stop judging you guys on your preferences. Your free to bang family members as soon as we can re-write

these archaic state laws.

Where did we say these were preferences of ours. He just ask that some merely prove why it is wrong.

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

You obviously have not spent a lot of time around goats.

They are pretty willing. If you get the right ones, they just freeze up like a lifeless hooker and let you work.

 

[bassplayer5504 10+ year member]

I say wrong. However, if you look at it from a different perspective there is probably a lot of factors that made it feel "right" to them. One to consider is the way they were raised (I'm not talking about it's OK to have *** with your sibling, but if sounds like an emotionaly affectionate family) This can end up having a stronger emotional and psychological affect. The age they were at could have had a lot to do with it also. This is a much different case than the usual "my dad ***** me" ****** cases. When poeple have a chemistry together it is literally that the chemicals in their bodies make them feel the way they do. They just happen to have the "chemistry" with their sibling.

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

The only reasoning I can see for this being wrong is due to society's judgement. Its pretty obvious that society isn't always a good judge of what is right or wrong.
Who knows, maybe throwin a couple loads into your sister before branching out to real world tang is the way to go...many of us will never know because society tells us not to...

Yes that is all I had too, which just doesn't prove why.

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

The only reasoning I can see for this being wrong is due to society's judgement. Its pretty obvious that society isn't always a good judge of what is right or wrong.
Who knows, maybe throwin a couple loads into your sister before branching out to real world tang is the way to go...many of us will never know because society tells us not to...

Well my concern is that society is filled with idiots who think things are just because they are, even if it is just in their mind. You know this as well as I do.

That's why society should make their decisions based on certain repeatable methodologies; otherwise, you and I are open to the whims of any number of degenerates who believe, say, voting non-Democrat is wrong just because the majority voted in support of the Dems.

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

Reagan put it best:

"Status quo is latin for the mess we're in."

That's not to say that we're at a moral impasse with respect to inter-family relations....only to say that the status quo is, on its own, not sufficient enough to permit its continuance.