*** With A Sibling - Wrong? (consensual, good read)

[WOT]

Im doing a presentation for my social studies class on siblings, and there relationships and what affects them. While searching for info I came across this, published article.

http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article4332635.ece

What are your guys mature thoughts on it?

Cliffs: Sister/brother have a ****** relationship for 13 years, consensual, sister is jealous of new wife and cuts bro off of ***

I personally think it is still ****** and wrong, but the whole consensual thing puts a twist on it and the fact that they have been doing this since they were 14.....

Click to read more...

 

[James Bang 5,000+ posts]

bonobos

 

[Z-Ro 10+ year member]

You dont fuck your family members, period.

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

god makes inbred children look funny for a reason, its a reminder not to fuk your sister

 

[Annnarbor84 5,000+ posts]

I feel dirty after checking out this thread:crap:

 

[stillfly45 10+ year member]

dont care its still disgusting and wrong

 

[wu501 10+ year member]

w..t...f...

 

[Banana Balls 5,000+ posts]

Either pix of sister or content of article are required ITT.

 

[alvitae 10+ year member]

It's ok.....If you're trying to create a race with big heads and 6 fingers on eachhand.

 

[bumpintrunk 10+ year member]

thats just sick...doing your sister...ewwwww that a be torture

 

[Tiger Bass 5,000+ posts]

Hot twins are allowed to do naughty things to each other, but only in the presence of a camera for redistribution of said events across the internet.

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

I don't have a sister, so you'll have to take what I say with a grain of salt.

No, I don't believe that *** with a sibling is wrong. I agree that producing damaged offspring is somewhat irresponsible, but if the goal is not procreation, and both parties are consenting, then I see no reason why I can factually say "That is wrong".

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

Either pix of sister or content of article are required ITT.

This

 

[OoMesKoO 10+ year member]

I don't have a sister, so you'll have to take what I say with a grain of salt.
No, I don't believe that *** with a sibling is wrong. I agree that producing damaged offspring is somewhat irresponsible, but if the goal is not procreation, and both parties are consenting, then I see no reason why I can factually say "That is wrong".

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wow.gif.23d729408e9177caa2a0ed6a2ba6588e.gif

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

I don't have a sister, so you'll have to take what I say with a grain of salt.
No, I don't believe that *** with a sibling is wrong. I agree that producing damaged offspring is somewhat irresponsible, but if the goal is not procreation, and both parties are consenting, then I see no reason why I can factually say "That is wrong".

Dam, Neil has a little troll in him.