Wire crescendo pwx to 2ohms?

OK, I had to look at your profile to fully understand your question. Looks like you have 4 of the 4-ohm PWX 6.5's and you want to use the ppi900/4 as a two-channel amp and run the PWX's in parallel so each channel sees 2-ohms. Correct?

The most power *per speaker* would be to run each of the four 4-ohm speakers separately on each of the 4 channels. You will get 100wRMS *per speaker* or 400W rms total.

If you run the PWXs in parallel for 2-ohms and only use 2-channels of the PPI then you will be getting 75w *per speaker* or 300 W total.

You cannot run the PPI bridged because it is only rated for a 4-ohm load when bridged.

 
OK, I had to look at your profile to fully understand your question. Looks like you have 4 of the 4-ohm PWX 6.5's and you want to use the ppi900/4 as a two-channel amp and run the PWX's in parallel so each channel sees 2-ohms. Correct?
The most power *per speaker* would be to run each of the four 4-ohm speakers separately on each of the 4 channels. You will get 100wRMS *per speaker* or 400W rms total.

If you run the PWXs in parallel for 2-ohms and only use 2-channels of the PPI then you will be getting 75w *per speaker* or 300 W total.

You cannot run the PPI bridged because it is only rated for a 4-ohm load when bridged.
would there be another amp you would recommend that puts out matched watts for the speakers?

 
OK, I had to look at your profile to fully understand your question. Looks like you have 4 of the 4-ohm PWX 6.5's and you want to use the ppi900/4 as a two-channel amp and run the PWX's in parallel so each channel sees 2-ohms. Correct?
The most power *per speaker* would be to run each of the four 4-ohm speakers separately on each of the 4 channels. You will get 100wRMS *per speaker* or 400W rms total.

If you run the PWXs in parallel for 2-ohms and only use 2-channels of the PPI then you will be getting 75w *per speaker* or 300 W total.

You cannot run the PPI bridged because it is only rated for a 4-ohm load when bridged.
would there be another amp you would recommend that puts out matched watts for the speakers?

 
would there be another amp you would recommend that puts out matched watts for the speakers?
There are a lot of choices for the same price range as the PPI 900/4. I'm sure many here will chime in.

Can you please confirm my assumptions above - are your PWXs the 4-ohm version? And you have 4 of them - right?

 
There are a lot of choices for the same price range as the PPI 900/4. I'm sure many here will chime in. Can you please confirm my assumptions above - are your PWXs the 4-ohm version? And you have 4 of them - right?
Yes. Sorry. I have 4 of the 4 ohm PWXs.

 
Yes. Sorry. I have 4 of the 4 ohm PWXs.
I am partial to ARC Audio and JL Audio 4-channel amps but you may have to hunt around to hit your $200 price point (what is max budget?).

If you are willing to run two of the PWXs in parallel at 2-ohms, then run a good 2-channel amp, unbridged - you will have a lot more choices.

 
I am partial to ARC Audio and JL Audio 4-channel amps but you may have to hunt around to hit your $200 price point (what is max budget?).If you are willing to run two of the PWXs in parallel at 2-ohms, then run a good 2-channel amp, unbridged - you will have a lot more choices.
About 200$ is right. I'm still waiting for a little more cash to come in. Going to be buying some subs and fab a box. which will cost me about 350$

 
I am partial to ARC Audio and JL Audio 4-channel amps but you may have to hunt around to hit your $200 price point (what is max budget?).If you are willing to run two of the PWXs in parallel at 2-ohms, then run a good 2-channel amp, unbridged - you will have a lot more choices.
About 200$ is right. I'm still waiting for a little more cash to come in. Going to be buying some subs and fab a box. which will cost me about 350$

 
OK, I had to look at your profile to fully understand your question. Looks like you have 4 of the 4-ohm PWX 6.5's and you want to use the ppi900/4 as a two-channel amp and run the PWX's in parallel so each channel sees 2-ohms. Correct?
The most power *per speaker* would be to run each of the four 4-ohm speakers separately on each of the 4 channels. You will get 100wRMS *per speaker* or 400W rms total.

If you run the PWXs in parallel for 2-ohms and only use 2-channels of the PPI then you will be getting 75w *per speaker* or 300 W total.

You cannot run the PPI bridged because it is only rated for a 4-ohm load when bridged.
he can connect them pwx's in series mode

 

---------- Post added at 02:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:12 PM ----------

 

OK, I had to look at your profile to fully understand your question. Looks like you have 4 of the 4-ohm PWX 6.5's and you want to use the ppi900/4 as a two-channel amp and run the PWX's in parallel so each channel sees 2-ohms. Correct?
The most power *per speaker* would be to run each of the four 4-ohm speakers separately on each of the 4 channels. You will get 100wRMS *per speaker* or 400W rms total.

If you run the PWXs in parallel for 2-ohms and only use 2-channels of the PPI then you will be getting 75w *per speaker* or 300 W total.

You cannot run the PPI bridged because it is only rated for a 4-ohm load when bridged.
he can connect them pwx's in series mode

 
he can connect them pwx's in series mode 

---------- Post added at 02:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:12 PM ----------

 

he can connect them pwx's in series mode
They are 4-ohm speakers. Not sure why he would want an 8-ohm load - would result in even less power.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

j4tk

Member
Thread starter
j4tk
Joined
Location
San Antonio
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
11
Views
1,160
Last reply date
Last reply from
Sub Woofin
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top