I think it's naive to think Biden's plan will somehow work out and the national debt will somehow get better. I also think it's silly to compare amount of debt to how quickly the debt climbed under the previous admin. It was lower than the current no matter how fast it climbed before. However, I assume you are ok with the debt from the previous admin since you are ok with the higher debt of the current admin. Unless you think higher national debt is better you should be happier with the debt under Trump. Right?What’s odd is to blame the debt on Biden when the graph you present shows it has always increased from the point where the X and Y intersect.
Under his predecessor’s watch, debt increased at its third fastest rate ever, assisted in part by tax cuts that were promised to miraculously cure the deficit and the debt. (A tactic that has never worked.) And it began before pandemic spending was even a thought.
If debt is part of a larger plan and the plan can be carried out, debt is not necessarily a bad thing. Business uses it all the time.
The trick is allowing a historically successful plan and strategy to play out instead of wrecking it merely because one’s party demands it.
What’s odd is to blame the debt on Biden when the graph you present shows it has always increased from the point where the X and Y intersect.
Under his predecessor’s watch, debt increased at its third fastest rate ever, assisted in part by tax cuts that were promised to miraculously cure the deficit and the debt. (A tactic that has never worked.) And it began before pandemic spending was even a thought.
If debt is part of a larger plan and the plan can be carried out, debt is not necessarily a bad thing. Business uses it all the time.
The trick is allowing a historically successful plan and strategy to play out instead of wrecking it merely because one’s party demands it.
Wonder why?
‘“So many of these billionaires knew him,” Mr. Marsh said. “Nobody ever said ‘Watch out for him.’ ”’
![]()
WSJ News Exclusive | Jeffrey Epstein Documents, Part 2: Dinners With Lawrence Summers and Movie Screenings With Woody Allen
Schedules and emails show deeper relationships between the disgraced financier and a range of prominent people, including the former Treasury Secretary and the filmmakerwww.wsj.com
So of the really bad places might switch...but I wouldn't count on portland...might see a change in WA but that's a long shot...Denver's probably a 50/50 thing...anywhere in Cali is gonna hold the line![]()
I'd put every nickel i have that portland won't change...my relatives down there hear how portland is a sh!thole because of trump...Cali isn't gonna change until there's a real breaking point...like lack of tax revenue or revolt before change happens...Many of these places (Portland, San Fran, Denver) have gone from extremely desirable to shytholes in a matter of years. Even clueless liberals are going to get sick of needles & human feces littering the neighbors.
I think it's naive to think Biden's plan will somehow work out and the national debt will somehow get better. I also think it's silly to compare amount of debt to how quickly the debt climbed under the previous admin. It was lower than the current no matter how fast it climbed before. However, I assume you are ok with the debt from the previous admin since you are ok with the higher debt of the current admin. Unless you think higher national debt is better you should be happier with the debt under Trump. Right?
That goes without saying.The national debt can't be blamed on any one party or administration. Everybody along the way had a hand in creating that monstrosity.
![]()
The Banking Collapse Of 2023 Is Now Officially Bigger Than The Banking Collapse Of 2008 Was
Yes, you read the headline correctly. Collectively, the three big banks that have collapsed in 2023 had more assets than all 25 banks that collapsed in 2008 did. Unfortunately, the banking collapse of 2023 istheeconomiccollapseblog.com