Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You said if you are on a road, you are IN the road.
That is incorrect by any definition of "in", except maybe the made-up one in your mind.
"Don't you mean we drive in the road?" Your words.

If the road goes through a tunnel and you are on that road, then you are IN the tunnel, but not IN the road.
The road is IN the tunnel, as are you, as is your car.
You are IN your car, ON the road, IN a tunnel.

Welcome to the English language.
Wow... you going to feign ignorance?

Ok cool, so you are changing your stance on the nerves too then because it is the same analogy. The nerve (the nerve is the car with us in it) is not IN the bone (bone being the road) it is going through the tunnels of the bone. Very good Rob, now you are learning. Moron.
 
I don't see how we can avoid nuclear sooner or later.
Hopefully they continue the trajectory they’ve been on with the likes of solar and wind, continue the move towards efficiency, and have breakthroughs.

Over the past several years, the lighting in my house has gone from over 2,000 watts to probably less than 200. That’s huge. I can’t imagine what it’s like for big-scale lighting like office buildings, skyscrapers, streetlights, etc.
 
Wow... you going to feign ignorance?

Ok cool, so you are changing your stance on the nerves too then because it is the same analogy. The nerve (the nerve is the car with us in it) is not IN the bone (bone being the road) it is going through the tunnels of the bone. Very good Rob, now you are learning. Moron.
You are so ridiculously out of your depth here, it’s not even comical.

You now think a nerve inside a bone is analogous to a car rolling on a road, and thus it’s not “in” the bone?
You do realize the bone surrounds the nerve fibers, don’t you?
You do realize there is not a single central tunnel that runs through your bones with a nerve fiber in it, don’t you?
You think a car goi g down the highway is “in” the road?

You realize you sound like complete moron when you attempt to support your idiotic belief by saying “in” is not “in”, and the whole world of medicine has it wrong, don’t you?

Was it a head injury on the military base that got you you little payoff and put you out of work?
And do you do LSD or drink heavily before you post here?
 
You are so ridiculously out of your depth here, it’s not even comical.

You now think a nerve inside a bone is analogous to a car rolling on a road, and thus it’s not “in” the bone?
Now? It has been my position from the beginning stupid. Pay attention.
You do realize the bone surrounds the nerve fibers, don’t you?
Indeed I do, exactly like a tunnel.
You do realize there is not a single central tunnel that runs through your bones with a nerve fiber in it, don’t you?
Never insinuated that it was as there are billions and billions of nerves. Dumbasss.
You think a car goi g down the highway is “in” the road?
No, I do not you uncomprehending diick licker. That was a jab at you, idiot.
You realize you sound like complete moron when you attempt to support your idiotic belief by saying “in” is not “in”, and the whole world of medicine has it wrong, don’t you?
The only person wrong here is you. You only have yourself to blame as you refuse to see anything other than the way your singular mind will allow you to see things.
Was it a head injury on the military base that got you you little payoff and put you out of work?
And do you do LSD or drink heavily before you post here?
You are stutter typing again... are you triggered again?
LSD, nope. I don't do drugs. I drink very heavily. It's called water.
It amazes me how easy you get shit wrong.
 
Now? It has been my position from the beginning stupid. Pay attention.
OK. So those pine needles are “in” my roof and not “on” it, and the nerves are not “in” the bones, just “through them”, and your mono amp is “internally bridged” with “multiple outputs”, and the set of numbers an average is calculated from cannot include the average, and if you only have two possible options, one can be a choice but the other one is simultaneously not a choice, and gas cannot be purchased at a rest stop

That’s one fvcked up reality your mind resides in.
Indeed I do, exactly like a tunnel.
But the tunnel is open on the top and at each end.
Never insinuated that it was as there are billions and billions of nerves. Dumbasss.

No, I do not you uncomprehending diick licker. That was a jab at you, idiot.

The only person wrong here is you. You only have yourself to blame as you refuse to see anything other than the way your singular mind will allow you to see things.
Tell us more about “in” not being “in”. Or about “choice” not being “choice”. Or how *** organs always determine your ****** orientation, except if you have no *** organs.
You are stutter typing again... are you triggered again?
LSD, nope. I don't do drugs. I drink very heavily. It's called water.
It amazes me how easy you get shit wrong.
You should have opted for the LSD or booze. At least have something you can blame your brain damage on.
 
OK. So those pine needles are “in” my roof and not “on” it, and the nerves are not “in” the bones, just “through them”, and your mono amp is “internally bridged” with “multiple outputs”, and the set of numbers an average is calculated from cannot include the average, and if you only have two possible options, one can be a choice but the other one is simultaneously not a choice, and gas cannot be purchased at a rest stop
Are pine needles fuickng nerves? Stop trying to talk shit and stick to the point retard.
But the tunnel is open on the top and at each end.
No shit.
Tell us more about “in” not being “in”. Or about “choice” not being “choice”. Or how *** organs always determine your ****** orientation, except if you have no *** organs.
Tell us how you are not biased, one sided, single minded... yeah, exactly.
You should have opted for the LSD or booze. At least have something you can blame your brain damage on.
Is that what you do... blame your mental retardation on LSD, Booze? So when do we see this undeniable proof that you are not a troll? Are you having trouble Googling the instruction on how to prove you are not a troll? Try different phrases. I know that is a foreign concept to you because you are a follower and thinking in different ways is a problem for you.
 
So I think what is going to happen for Bud Light is their stock have dropped, will drop some more. I would say grab as many shares as you can because they will have NO CHOICE but to fire the decision makers that did this, they will bring in new people and use it to apologize to the masses to win everyone back. Which will work, probably slowly at first. One thing you can count on is alcoholics will keep drinking. Stocks will go back up. Money will be made. Better hurry.
 
Are pine needles fuickng nerves? Stop trying to talk shit and stick to the point retard.
It’s just following along with your special self-made definitions.
I put some ice on my glass of warm Coca Cola today. And then I slathered some garlic in my uncooked steak.
No shit.

Tell us how you are not biased, one sided, single minded... yeah, exactly.
I never claimed I wasn’t biased. Anyone who claims to be without bias is full of shit.
Is that what you do... blame your mental retardation on LSD, Booze? So when do we see this undeniable proof that you are not a troll? Are you having trouble Googling the instruction on how to prove you are not a troll? Try different phrases. I know that is a foreign concept to you because you are a follower and thinking in different ways is a problem for you.
You had the opportunity to blame your low IQ on outside forces. You chose to take full responsibility for it. Good on you.

Show us your great independence of thought and action.
How about a list of your discoveries?
How about a list of well known and commonly accepted facts that you have disputed and disproved?

Let’s start with your claim that the data gathered, collated, analyzed, and disseminated by the BLS is just a wild-*** guess.
Maybe move on to the grievous errors made by the editors of the OED with various definitions.
Move on to the huge mistakes made in the mathematical world regarding the worth of averages.
 
Let’s start with your claim that the data gathered, collated, analyzed, and disseminated by the BLS is just a wild-*** guess.
Show me this claim. Verbatim.
Maybe move on to the grievous errors made by the editors of the OED with various definitions.
Been covered.
Move on to the huge mistakes made in the mathematical world regarding the worth of averages.
Do averages simplify math?
Can averages be used for nefarious means?

These are simple yes or no questions. You do not need to spin shit, use what if's, play with hypotheticals. Yes or No is all that is needed for the two questions above. You up to the challenge sailor? Can you answer simple questions with simple, one word answers?
 
So I think what is going to happen for Bud Light is their stock have dropped, will drop some more. I would say grab as many shares as you can because they will have NO CHOICE but to fire the decision makers that did this, they will bring in new people and use it to apologize to the masses to win everyone back. Which will work, probably slowly at first. One thing you can count on is alcoholics will keep drinking. Stocks will go back up. Money will be made. Better hurry.

Although I could give a flying phuck if same ***** person is an influencer for anything I use/consume, I do think Bud made a fatal mistake. A big company like Bud needs to market defensively - IOW it's more important to keep market share than attempt to gain a new demographic. I'm guessing the beer drinking redneck, transphobic, gun totting culture war conservatives drink a lot more Bud Light than the woke LGBTQxyz crowd by a long shot. Is the LGBTQxyz crowd really going to put down their wine spritzers and start guzzling Bud Light by the case??? I do think some heads should roll for this marketing campaign, which is unfortunate because that means the transphobes win, but it was a bad move by Bud. Bud should let Dylan be the face of Babe carbonated canned wine. Although Babe seems to already have the LGBTQxyz crowd on board.
 
Last edited:
Show me this claim. Verbatim.
1681353883709.png

"Job tracking isn't not accurate and is only estimated at best."
If it's not accurate and at BEST only an estimate, then it's just a wild-*** guess.
"guess - to arrive at or commit oneself to an opinion about (something) without having sufficient evidence to support the opinion fully"
The BLS gets data from every tax-paying business in the US, but you think they just guess their info because the Census Bureau pays a dollar to people to take the census (or some dumb shit like that).
Been covered.
Not covered at all. "People are fallible" does not prove you know a definition and the OED got it wrong.
Do averages simplify math?
Can averages be used for nefarious means?
That's not your claim. your claim is "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means". ONLY is an important word.
These are simple yes or no questions. You do not need to spin shit, use what if's, play with hypotheticals. Yes or No is all that is needed for the two questions above. You up to the challenge sailor? Can you answer simple questions with simple, one word answers?
They would be simple Yes/No questions if you expected them to be taken out of context. But YOU are the one always screaming about context and the context is important here. The context being the sentence above, which I will share again: "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means"
Don't try to change your original sentence into something new by leaving out important words.

It's funny how you always accuse me of changing your words (yet cannot ever prove it), but here you are trying to change the meaning of your original dumbass claim by ignoring key words in the claim.
Ironic.
 

Attachments

  • 1681353888430.png
    1681353888430.png
    42.7 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
Although I could give a flying phuck if same ***** person is an influencer for anything I use/consume, I do think Bud made a fatal mistake. A big company like Bud needs to market defensively - IOW it's more important to keep market share than attempt to gain a new demographic. I'm guessing the beer drinking redneck, transphobic, gun totting culture war conservatives drink a lot more Bud Light than the woke LGBTQxyz crowd by a long shot. Is the LGBTQxyz crowd really going to put down their wine spritzers and start guzzling Bud Light by the case??? I do think some heads should roll for this marketing campaign, which is unfortunate because that means the transphobes win, but it was a bad move by Bud. Bud should let Dylan be the face of Babe carbonated canned wine. Although Babe seems to already have the LGBTQxyz crowd on board.
They seem to have been losing market share for a while. Down almost 5% in revenues 2017-2019. That's not a good thing for the stock price.
Maybe they are doing anything they can think of to try and get back to a former glory?

1681357216521.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,113,152
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top