Winners only.

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

They seem to have been losing market share for a while. Down almost 5% in revenues 2017-2019. That's not a good thing for the stock price.
Maybe they are doing anything they can think of to try and get back to a former glory?

View attachment 48401

It's a natural cycle. When you dominate market share there only two things that can happen - you can maintain market share, which is tough since everybody is coming after you. More likely your market share will decline, so it's a matter of managing that decline. Buy up and coming brands, merge with another company, expand into new markets (ie food), sell the company to a bigger conglomerate, etc. For some reason Bud Light decided flipping off a huge core customer base to revamp their image was the way to go. Could be this was strategic - hammer the stock price to make the company more appealing to a buyer, except that the middle of a recession with high interest rates isn't a great environment for a take over.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I think someone is already on the moon. I suspect there’s tech we don’t know about that’s not rockets that can be used for space travel. Or at least we went over 50 years ago, and it’s hard for me to imagine we permanently stopped going; we may just not know about it anymore.

Here we go again. It never stops. I guess opiates are the real deal.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

@Eggs

Explosion at Texas dairy farm kills nearly 20,000 cattle, critically injures 1 person

It is the most deadly barn fire for cattle in Texas history, officials say.

www.cleveland.com

Can you imagine what almost 20k dead cows looks like? How does a cattle farm explode/catch on fire like this? Wtf!

Damm methane farts are deadly…. Good thing gates on that 3d meats

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

View attachment 48399
"Job tracking isn't not accurate and is only estimated at best."
If it's not accurate and at BEST only an estimate, then it's just a wild-*** guess.
"guess - to arrive at or commit oneself to an opinion about (something) without having sufficient evidence to support the opinion fully"
The BLS gets data from every tax-paying business in the US, but you think they just guess their info because the Census Bureau pays a dollar to people to take the census (or some dumb shit like that).

Good job lil buddy. As I said, not accurate. They are not counting every single person. They are only counting what is given to them to count. If you think everyone is reporting you are confirming your stupidity.

Not covered at all. "People are fallible" does not prove you know a definition and the OED got it wrong.

It has been covered several times as you love to beat a dead horse.

That's not your claim. your claim is "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means". ONLY is an important word.

They would be simple Yes/No questions if you expected them to be taken out of context. But YOU are the one always screaming about context and the context is important here. The context being the sentence above, which I will share again: "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means"
Don't try to change your original sentence into something new by leaving out important words.

It's funny how you always accuse me of changing your words (yet cannot ever prove it), but here you are trying to change the meaning of your original dumbass claim by ignoring key words in the claim.
Ironic.

You are a clown lol

Do averages simplify math? The answer is YES. You coward.
Can averages be used nefariously? The answer is YES.

Like I said, you are a coward. You knew the answers, you refuse to answer them because you don't want to admit I am right and I am right. That's the kind of jackasss you are. Even when someone proves shit to you your ego gets in the way.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Lab brown meats derived from cancer cells to help quick infiltrate multiplying

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Good job lil buddy. As I said, not accurate. They are not counting every single person. They are only counting what is given to them to count. If you think everyone is reporting you are confirming your stupidity.

OK. So you now want to change you argument from they don't get accurate info or enough info to "they are not counting every person", even though they get the employee tax data from all US businesses.
So let's run with your theory: If "they are not counting every single person" that enters a newly created job position, then they are actually UNDERreporting the number of new jobs. That means there were more new jobs than they reported, which means the situation is even better than we know.
If job creation is a metric to judge the success of a POTUS, then you just made a claim that Biden is doing even better than the BLS reports tell us.

It has been covered several times as you love to beat a dead horse.

Once again, you simply giving us a "because I said so" does not mean you know definitions better than the editors of the OED.

You are a clown lol

Do averages simplify math? The answer is YES. You coward.
Can averages be used nefariously? The answer is YES.

Like I said, you are a coward. You knew the answers, you refuse to answer them because you don't want to admit I am right and I am right. That's the kind of jackasss you are. Even when someone proves shit to you your ego gets in the way.

Lets try again, kid: YOUR words "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means"
"Only - and no one or nothing more besides; solely or exclusively"

ONLY for lazy people or ONLY for nefarious means.
Two choices. A rule created by you. Lemme guess: One is a choice but the other is not?

Why are you being a coward and trying to change your words to make your argument more plausible?
Are you afraid everyone will know you screwed up again and opened your mouth without knowing what you are talking about?
Did you think you could just change your words to cover your tracks , and that no one would notice?

Tell the truth and you don't have to lie to cover for your lies.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

OK. So you now want to change you argument from they don't get accurate info or enough info to "they are not counting every person", even though they get the employee tax data from all US businesses.
So let's run with your theory: If "they are not counting every single person" that enters a newly created job position, then they are actually UNDERreporting the number of new jobs. That means there were more new jobs than they reported, which means the situation is even better than we know.
If job creation is a metric to judge the success of a POTUS, then you just made a claim that Biden is doing even better than the BLS reports tell us.


Once again, you simply giving us a "because I said so" does not mean you know definitions better than the editors of the OED.

Lets try again, kid: YOUR words "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means"
"Only - and no one or nothing more besides; solely or exclusively"

ONLY for lazy people or ONLY for nefarious means.
Two choices. A rule created by you. Lemme guess: One is a choice but the other is not?

Why are you being a coward and trying to change your words to make your argument more plausible?
Are you afraid everyone will know you screwed up again and opened your mouth without knowing what you are talking about?
Did you think you could just change your words to cover your tracks , and that no one would notice?

Tell the truth and you don't have to lie to cover for your lies.

Coward

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Joe Rogan Issues Warning After AI-Generated Version Of His Podcast Surfaces | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

A Third of Researchers Think that AI Could Cause a Nuclear-Level Catastrophe

According to a survey conducted by Stanford University, 36 percent of AI researchers believe that AI could cause "nuclear-level catastrophe." Great.

futurism.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

A Third of Researchers Think that AI Could Cause a Nuclear-Level Catastrophe

According to a survey conducted by Stanford University, 36 percent of AI researchers believe that AI could cause "nuclear-level catastrophe." Great.

futurism.com

And 2/3 know that AI is helping prevent nuclear-level catastrophe.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Meet the workers using ChatGPT to take on multiple full-time jobs

'Overemployed' workers say that ChatGPT allows them to complete their workload in at least half the time, so they can pick up a second job simultaneously.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Coward

Seem YOU are the coward, avoiding a legit response to yet another post that shows you are the fool.

Afraid to answer the questions? I'll try again:
YOUR words "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means"
"Only - and no one or nothing more besides; solely or exclusively"

ONLY for lazy people or ONLY for nefarious means.
Two choices. A rule created by you. Lemme guess: One is a choice but the other is not?

Why are you being a coward and trying to change your words to make your argument more plausible?
Are you afraid everyone will know you screwed up again and opened your mouth without knowing what you are talking about?
Did you think you could just change your words to cover your tracks , and that no one would notice?

When a caterer figures out the average buffalo wing consumption per person at a party so they deliver enough, are they being lazy or nefarious?

When a gas station owner figures out their average sales so they can put in the correct size larger tank, are they being lazy or nefarious?

If new jobs are being UNDERrecorded, does that mean there are MORE new jobs we can credit Biden with?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Seem YOU are the coward, avoiding a legit response to yet another post that shows you are the fool.

Afraid to answer the questions? I'll try again:
YOUR words "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means"
"Only - and no one or nothing more besides; solely or exclusively"

ONLY for lazy people or ONLY for nefarious means.
Two choices. A rule created by you. Lemme guess: One is a choice but the other is not?

Why are you being a coward and trying to change your words to make your argument more plausible?
Are you afraid everyone will know you screwed up again and opened your mouth without knowing what you are talking about?
Did you think you could just change your words to cover your tracks , and that no one would notice?

When a caterer figures out the average buffalo wing consumption per person at a party so they deliver enough, are they being lazy or nefarious?

When a gas station owner figures out their average sales so they can put in the correct size larger tank, are they being lazy or nefarious?

If new jobs are being UNDERrecorded, does that mean there are MORE new jobs we can credit Biden with?

No, you refuse to answer direct questions hiding behind the excuse of an old post.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No, you refuse to answer direct questions hiding behind the excuse of an old post.

Old doesn't mean it never happened.
So, can you answer the simple questions?

Just so you don't have to scroll back and forth:
Why are you being a coward and trying to change your words to make your argument more plausible?
Are you afraid everyone will know you screwed up again and opened your mouth without knowing what you are talking about?
Did you think you could just change your words to cover your tracks , and that no one would notice?
Why do you accuse people of changing your words when you have no proof of it, yet you change your own words to cover your errors?

When a caterer figures out the average buffalo wing consumption per person at a party so they deliver enough, are they being lazy or nefarious?

When a gas station owner figures out their average sales so they can put in the correct size larger tank, are they being lazy or nefarious?

If new jobs are being UNDERrecorded, does that mean there are MORE new jobs we can credit Biden with?

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Dont know his step bro waited this long