Wow... you going to feign ignorance?You said if you are on a road, you are IN the road.
That is incorrect by any definition of "in", except maybe the made-up one in your mind.
"Don't you mean we drive in the road?" Your words.
If the road goes through a tunnel and you are on that road, then you are IN the tunnel, but not IN the road.
The road is IN the tunnel, as are you, as is your car.
You are IN your car, ON the road, IN a tunnel.
Welcome to the English language.
He LOVES the cock!More triggered feigned-********** ad-hominem.
The best you can summon when your IQ is classified as "dull".
Hopefully they continue the trajectory they’ve been on with the likes of solar and wind, continue the move towards efficiency, and have breakthroughs.I don't see how we can avoid nuclear sooner or later.
You are so ridiculously out of your depth here, it’s not even comical.Wow... you going to feign ignorance?
Ok cool, so you are changing your stance on the nerves too then because it is the same analogy. The nerve (the nerve is the car with us in it) is not IN the bone (bone being the road) it is going through the tunnels of the bone. Very good Rob, now you are learning. Moron.
Now? It has been my position from the beginning stupid. Pay attention.You are so ridiculously out of your depth here, it’s not even comical.
You now think a nerve inside a bone is analogous to a car rolling on a road, and thus it’s not “in” the bone?
Indeed I do, exactly like a tunnel.You do realize the bone surrounds the nerve fibers, don’t you?
Never insinuated that it was as there are billions and billions of nerves. Dumbasss.You do realize there is not a single central tunnel that runs through your bones with a nerve fiber in it, don’t you?
No, I do not you uncomprehending diick licker. That was a jab at you, idiot.You think a car goi g down the highway is “in” the road?
The only person wrong here is you. You only have yourself to blame as you refuse to see anything other than the way your singular mind will allow you to see things.You realize you sound like complete moron when you attempt to support your idiotic belief by saying “in” is not “in”, and the whole world of medicine has it wrong, don’t you?
You are stutter typing again... are you triggered again?Was it a head injury on the military base that got you you little payoff and put you out of work?
And do you do LSD or drink heavily before you post here?
OK. So those pine needles are “in” my roof and not “on” it, and the nerves are not “in” the bones, just “through them”, and your mono amp is “internally bridged” with “multiple outputs”, and the set of numbers an average is calculated from cannot include the average, and if you only have two possible options, one can be a choice but the other one is simultaneously not a choice, and gas cannot be purchased at a rest stopNow? It has been my position from the beginning stupid. Pay attention.
But the tunnel is open on the top and at each end.Indeed I do, exactly like a tunnel.
Tell us more about “in” not being “in”. Or about “choice” not being “choice”. Or how *** organs always determine your ****** orientation, except if you have no *** organs.Never insinuated that it was as there are billions and billions of nerves. Dumbasss.
No, I do not you uncomprehending diick licker. That was a jab at you, idiot.
The only person wrong here is you. You only have yourself to blame as you refuse to see anything other than the way your singular mind will allow you to see things.
You should have opted for the LSD or booze. At least have something you can blame your brain damage on.You are stutter typing again... are you triggered again?
LSD, nope. I don't do drugs. I drink very heavily. It's called water.
It amazes me how easy you get shit wrong.
Are pine needles fuickng nerves? Stop trying to talk shit and stick to the point retard.OK. So those pine needles are “in” my roof and not “on” it, and the nerves are not “in” the bones, just “through them”, and your mono amp is “internally bridged” with “multiple outputs”, and the set of numbers an average is calculated from cannot include the average, and if you only have two possible options, one can be a choice but the other one is simultaneously not a choice, and gas cannot be purchased at a rest stop
No shit.But the tunnel is open on the top and at each end.
Tell us how you are not biased, one sided, single minded... yeah, exactly.Tell us more about “in” not being “in”. Or about “choice” not being “choice”. Or how *** organs always determine your ****** orientation, except if you have no *** organs.
Is that what you do... blame your mental retardation on LSD, Booze? So when do we see this undeniable proof that you are not a troll? Are you having trouble Googling the instruction on how to prove you are not a troll? Try different phrases. I know that is a foreign concept to you because you are a follower and thinking in different ways is a problem for you.You should have opted for the LSD or booze. At least have something you can blame your brain damage on.
It’s just following along with your special self-made definitions.Are pine needles fuickng nerves? Stop trying to talk shit and stick to the point retard.
I never claimed I wasn’t biased. Anyone who claims to be without bias is full of shit.No shit.
Tell us how you are not biased, one sided, single minded... yeah, exactly.
You had the opportunity to blame your low IQ on outside forces. You chose to take full responsibility for it. Good on you.Is that what you do... blame your mental retardation on LSD, Booze? So when do we see this undeniable proof that you are not a troll? Are you having trouble Googling the instruction on how to prove you are not a troll? Try different phrases. I know that is a foreign concept to you because you are a follower and thinking in different ways is a problem for you.
Show me this claim. Verbatim.Let’s start with your claim that the data gathered, collated, analyzed, and disseminated by the BLS is just a wild-*** guess.
Been covered.Maybe move on to the grievous errors made by the editors of the OED with various definitions.
Do averages simplify math?Move on to the huge mistakes made in the mathematical world regarding the worth of averages.
So I think what is going to happen for Bud Light is their stock have dropped, will drop some more. I would say grab as many shares as you can because they will have NO CHOICE but to fire the decision makers that did this, they will bring in new people and use it to apologize to the masses to win everyone back. Which will work, probably slowly at first. One thing you can count on is alcoholics will keep drinking. Stocks will go back up. Money will be made. Better hurry.
Show me this claim. Verbatim.
Not covered at all. "People are fallible" does not prove you know a definition and the OED got it wrong.Been covered.
That's not your claim. your claim is "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means". ONLY is an important word.Do averages simplify math?
Can averages be used for nefarious means?
They would be simple Yes/No questions if you expected them to be taken out of context. But YOU are the one always screaming about context and the context is important here. The context being the sentence above, which I will share again: "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means"These are simple yes or no questions. You do not need to spin shit, use what if's, play with hypotheticals. Yes or No is all that is needed for the two questions above. You up to the challenge sailor? Can you answer simple questions with simple, one word answers?
They seem to have been losing market share for a while. Down almost 5% in revenues 2017-2019. That's not a good thing for the stock price.Although I could give a flying phuck if same ***** person is an influencer for anything I use/consume, I do think Bud made a fatal mistake. A big company like Bud needs to market defensively - IOW it's more important to keep market share than attempt to gain a new demographic. I'm guessing the beer drinking redneck, transphobic, gun totting culture war conservatives drink a lot more Bud Light than the woke LGBTQxyz crowd by a long shot. Is the LGBTQxyz crowd really going to put down their wine spritzers and start guzzling Bud Light by the case??? I do think some heads should roll for this marketing campaign, which is unfortunate because that means the transphobes win, but it was a bad move by Bud. Bud should let Dylan be the face of Babe carbonated canned wine. Although Babe seems to already have the LGBTQxyz crowd on board.