Winners only.

[Clifff150 10+ year member]

You don’t cite facts either. You just keep saying you’ve been in 3 mass shootings. And to Bucks comment, the reason we don’t get invaded is because our citizens have guns.

"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

It's not a matter of differing opinions. I don't like your opinion, but i acknowledge your right to an opinion. You don't like my opinion, and you think the government should intervene.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

@Bobbytwonames has disliked 24 of my posts and counting, but he just wants to have "adult conversations".

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

You don’t cite facts either. You just keep saying you’ve been in 3 mass shootings. And to Bucks comment, the reason we don’t get invaded is because our citizens have guns.

"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass."

I just stated that 26 of the last 80 mass shootings involved rifles. You guys need to read the posts also. Where is the proof of Bucks statement? That's his opinion. That's all that I cite is facts. I might be an assshole, but I'm not a liar. You guys do nothing but post statements and opinions without facts to back them up. A bunch of "Billy Badasses" and "Keyboard Cowboys". @metalheadjoe I've been here two and a half years and my rating is still higher than yours after 10+ years. Fukk, I even used to be -250 because of haters . You guys have a good day and stay safe!

 

[Clifff150 10+ year member]

Lol you stated one fact and it doesn’t support your argument of “assault rifles.” 26/80 is 33% which as you should know is not a majority. The problem with your “facts” is that you continue to show your *** on every thread so everything is taken with a grain of salt regardless of its validity. Kind of like boy crying wolf.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I just stated that 26 of the last 80 mass shootings involved rifles. You guys need to read the posts also. Where is the proof of Bucks statement? That's his opinion. That's all that I cite is facts. I might be an assshole, but I'm not a liar. You guys do nothing but post statements and opinions without facts to back them up. A bunch of "Billy Badasses" and "Keyboard Cowboys". @metalheadjoe I've been here two and a half years and my rating is still higher than yours after 10+ years. Fukk, I even used to be -250 because of haters . You guys have a good day and stay safe!

I posted with two graphs. The first one was from the FBI. I cited FACTS. Soooooooooooooooooooooo..........

Your 26 of the last 80 mass shootings of which those mass shooting only make up .2% of gun crimes, you think we should be more strict on the rifles? Is this correct Bobby?

 

[Clifff150 10+ year member]

His response will be;

I’ve been in 3 mass shootings so I know firsthand. If nothing changes then mass shootings don’t go away. Y’all are just haters. Just sayin!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

His response will be;

I’ve been in 3 mass shootings so I know firsthand. If nothing changes then mass shootings don’t go away. Y’all are just haters. Just sayin!

I know... I can see it coming already.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

I just stated that 26 of the last 80 mass shootings involved rifles. You guys need to read the posts also. Where is the proof of Bucks statement? That's his opinion. That's all that I cite is facts. I might be an assshole, but I'm not a liar. You guys do nothing but post statements and opinions without facts to back them up. A bunch of "Billy Badasses" and "Keyboard Cowboys". @metalheadjoe I've been here two and a half years and my rating is still higher than yours after 10+ years. Fukk, I even used to be -250 because of haters . You guys have a good day and stay safe!

Your rating is ~10%, and mine was over 33% before some loser got butthurt. Do you know how statistics work?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I posted with two graphs. The first one was from the FBI. I cited FACTS. Soooooooooooooooooooooo..........

Your 26 of the last 80 mass shootings of which those mass shooting only make up .2% of gun crimes, you think we should be more strict on the rifles? Is this correct Bobby?

Assault rifles and 100 round magazines should have stricter background checks than handguns or shotguns. IMO.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Your rating is ~10%, and mine was over 33% before some loser got butthurt. Do you know how statistics work?

I didn't get butt hurt. If you want to start calling me names, that's fine. That doesn't mean that I have to sit and take it, which I won't. I used to have groups of guys staying up all night just to dislike my posts. So, no worries. We can all play games. I never called you names or disliked your posts until you had to start it. So, games we shall play.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Assault rifles and 100 round magazines should have stricter background checks than handguns or shotguns. IMO.

Why? Clearly they are not the main problem when it comes to violence with guns. Why those particular weapons? Again, because they make the news? Because an AR-15 looks more frightening than a .357 Magnum Revolver? Why not just make ammunition more expensive? That way people are less likely to waste bullets. Like, let's see... make a 5.56 $250 a bullet. A 9mm $50 a bullet. The larger the size and greater damage the bullet could do, the higher the cost of the projectile. 50cal - $5000 a bullet. .357 Magnum $75 a bullet. .22 long rifle $7 a bullet. 12 gauge slug $88 per slug. 12 gauge buck shot $66, bird shot $55.

Just curious.... How many "100 round magazines" have you actually seen? I don't recall actually seeing these involved in mass shootings with AR-15's and the like. Seems like they would be heavy and would detract from the accuracy of the firearm. Or again... cause they look scary?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Why? Clearly they are not the main problem when it comes to violence with guns. Why those particular weapons? Again, because they make the news? Because an AR-15 looks more frightening than a .357 Magnum Revolver? Why not just make ammunition more expensive? That way people are less likely to waste bullets. Like, let's see... make a 5.56 $250 a bullet. A 9mm $50 a bullet. The larger the size and greater damage the bullet could do, the higher the cost of the projectile. 50cal - $5000 a bullet. .357 Magnum $75 a bullet. .22 long rifle $7 a bullet. 12 gauge slug $88 per slug. 12 gauge buck shot $66, bird shot $55.

Just curious.... How many "100 round magazines" have you actually seen? I don't recall actually seeing these involved in mass shootings with AR-15's and the like. Seems like they would be heavy and would detract from the accuracy of the firearm. Or again... cause they look scary?

I just know that the Mandalay Bay shooter got off over 1,000 rounds in 10 minutes. I think that's a little too much firepower for every citizen to have access to. But, that's just my opinion. I'm sure that nothing will change, it never does. As soon as people drop the 2nd amendment, then, the discussion ends. So, I hope that everybody stays safe and I hope that none of you guys or your families are ever involved in a situation like that. They aren't very much fun to be involved in. Just like a bank robbery or a plane crash, those aren't fun either. Be safe boys and take care!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I just know that the Mandalay Bay shooter got off over 1,000 rounds in 10 minutes. I think that's a little too much firepower for every citizen to have access to. But, that's just my opinion. I'm sure that nothing will change, it never does. As soon as people drop the 2nd amendment, then, the discussion ends. So, I hope that everybody stays safe and I hope that none of you guys or your families are ever involved in a situation like that. They aren't very much fun to be involved in. Just like a bank robbery or a plane crash, those aren't fun either. Be safe boys and take care!

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

What does that mean?