So don't address those numbers, focus on a different statistic, and put a word in quotations for some reason.Maybe you should consider those numbers and my “tangents” and what they say about people toeing a party line regardless of the truth.
Again: 81% of Republicans thought the economy was doing well under Trump, while we were in recession.
Let that sink in.
What I am doing Rob is giving different ways to view the same situation. You still don't get it. Since you don't get it, you want to argue. The best way for you to win an argument is to try and make the other person look stupid. In this case, you brought up welfare assistance. It is not a topic of THIS discussion. You have tried to make it one so you can argue.WTF are you talking about? YOU brought up the steak analogy and legality of eating it, but I'M the one with extreme views?
Put down the bottle and try to stay focused for a minute instead of ALWAYS tapdancing away from backing up the drivel that rolls from your fingertips.
No one said welfare is a get out of jail free card. YOU must assume it is if you want to present that argument.
Before we go further, please demonstrate in some way that you understand how healthcare works under the public assistance (welfare) system. If you know how it works, you can actually explain in less than 5 sentences.
If you can't explain it, then you really should drop any arguments that reference it, because it makes you seem ignorant. I can tell you for a fact that your argument above is TOTALLY off the mark.
I addressed the numbers. 94% of Republicans are unhappy. 81% were happy with recession.So don't address those numbers, focus on a different statistic, and put a word in quotations for some reason.
Good point!
YOU brought welfare into a discussion regarding abortion.What I am doing Rob is giving different ways to view the same situation. You still don't get it. Since you don't get it, you want to argue. The best way for you to win an argument is to try and make the other person look stupid. In this case, you brought up welfare assistance. It is not a topic of THIS discussion. You have tried to make it one so you can argue.
Here is this argument... in a nutshell.
ME: I do not care if abortion is legal or illegal. Legal or Not, payment for abortion should be the responsibility of the person getting the elected medical procedure.
YOU: So you care if it is legal or you wouldn't care who pays for it. Tell me how welfare works. You can't, you tap dancer!! You brought up steak dinner!!! I still don't understand the analogy so that means you are stupid stupid stupid. Tell me how welfare works or your argument is stupid.
You stupid idiot. The government GIVES cash assistance to women. They can use that money to pay for the abortion. Please stop being an asss.YOU brought welfare into a discussion regarding abortion.
YOU think that welfare “pays for abortions” and use that in your argument.
Welfare doesn’t work that way. You are using a false premise, and even repeated it in the quote above.
If you don’t know how it works, providing your evaluation and decision of what it should do is a fool’s folly.
Another strawman. And another clear example that you don’t know what you are talking about.You stupid idiot. The government GIVES cash assistance to women. They can use that money to pay for the abortion. Please stop being an asss.
Stfu. Take your strawman crap and shove it up your ***. I know people right now who get assistance and they spend the cash assistance however they want. Just go stab yourself in the nuts you idiot.Another strawman. And another clear example that you don’t know what you are talking about.
I’m being totally honest. You are using wholly incorrect assumptions of how the system works in order to bolster your argument. It makes you look bad.
The only analogy that may work is the claim someone made to me about the guys sitting on their deck, “waving their welfare check” at people walking by in their way to work, and laughing at them.
The genuinely believed it was happening.
There ARE no welfare checks. There ARE no food stamps.
It made them really dumb to be swearing to witness an event that could not have happened.
And they spend it on medical services that should be covered by an insurance policy?Stfu. Take your strawman crap and shove it up your ***. I know people right now who get assistance and they spend the cash assistance however they want. Just go stab yourself in the nuts you idiot.
I never ask them.And they spend it on medical services that should be covered by insurance?
Which cash program are they on?
Why the fukk are you talking about Clinton? Maybe because Hillary beat Trump in the popular vote. Kid that was 8 years ago.
There I fixed it for you.Why are you fixated on Hunter Biden? He isn't our President. I could care less whatadultschildren he has *** with. It's kind of creepy that you do care. Let me guess, you think the election was stolen. You probably also think that Trump handled the virus good. You believe that all news is fake news and the only person that you believe is Trump. You are brainwashed bro. You have been ****** into a cult and you don't even realize it. Trump is a game show host kid. Trump got blew out by Biden and you still can't accept it. Wake up man and think for yourself.
There I fixed it for you.
Hunter is a security threat because of his drug habit, losing guns in a dumpster and having child ***. He also has emails discussing shady business dealings with joe and him in ukraine and china.
All that is called security clearance. If you had one, you'd understand but you'd never get cleared for one.
You have anger issues, maybe see a therapist. Good luck w/ that.
View attachment 38097
Are you that stupid?This is too loaded with contradictions to even start…
1. You "don't care if it's legal or not", but if it's legal, you care a lot about how it' is paid for. Contradiction.
How it is paid for has ZERO contradictory conflict in the arguement of legality. Two different topics.
2. You "don't care if it's legal or not", but if it's legal, YOU determine it should not be paid for by private insurance (nice of you to make that decision for a private company). Contradiction.
His OPINION that insurance shouldn't pay for it has nothing to do with legality. Again two different topics.
3. You "don't care if it's legal or not", but if it's legal and she gets an abortion while on welfare (which prevents an increase in welfare that will be paid out), you want her to lose the welfare. Contradiction.
The states can impose requirements to get welfare, having a state guideline for receipt is not contradictory in relation to legality. People get convicted of drug charges, child ****, DUI and it does not stop them from qualifing for welfare but it should.
4. You think people who have a job don't have time to have ***. Plain stupidity.
For someone who "doesn't care", you seem to care an awful lot.
Make up your mind.
Are you that stupid?This is too loaded with contradictions to even start…