Is there a reason for this? Isn't the Type X supposed to be the better(higher up) model?
umm, the type X has less than a millimeter more xmax than the type R.the type x is a high excursion, expensive, sealed enclosure subwoofer.
the type r is a low excursion, quality bl, cheap, ported enclosure subwoofer.
the type r lends to higher spl scores, hence the e-Boner.
x2, except the low excursion part (18 mm one-way isn't low //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif )
ooookay? Specs dont lie, the Type R has 18mm xmax and the type X has 19mm, I dunno about about xmech, but you shouldnt be pushing it that far anyways //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifI dunno ive seen my type x's excursion and it doesnt compare to a type R..excursion wise.
why do you ask so many fuucking dumbass questions?Is there a reason for this? Isn't the Type X supposed to be the better(higher up) model?