Why do I want to avoid oval 6x9 speakers?

DSCLegend

Junior Member
2
0
USA
Hello guys, Im new here:uhoh: and I've been doing my search in the forums.

Looking for a replacement 6x9 I noticed that a lot of you are bashing on 6x9s, but I couldn't find out why. I even read "Round Speakers VS Oval Speakers" in the FAQ but did not find the answer I was looking for.

Thanks for going easy on my first post //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tomatoface.gif.6507032fedd1868ec0a6a447bb29a18a.gif

 
I got bashed on some other forums for this, too. I guess 6x9s have round voice coils (not sure if that comes into play or not) but from what I gather (from "audiophiles") is that the shape of the cone inherently produces stress is certain locations in the cone therefore producing distortion. A round cone won't do this. Maybe the distortion can not be heard by the human voice, I don't know I'm not a speaker designer. Even at the Polk website someone gave me this information on 6x9s. I got some nasty remarks when I posted a thread stating that I recently purchased some 6x9s.

 
no comment......

okay.. a few maybe...

if you are going to spend this kind of money, go with a good component set... a round cone has equal displacement, where-as an oval cone on a round coil inherently is not going to expel the energy equally..hence, the frequency of said oval cone is usually compensated for by multiple smaller drivers-- usually mounted coaxially and usually not "aim-able" so you lose the effect of creating a good sound stage in the first place.

A component set will go in the same place as a 6x9, it has the tweeter mounted seperatly so you may mount that on the same baffle as the round speaker or move it up onto the door or window pillar-- improving the sound stage and overall better frequency response...

IMO of course........................... Just because something "works" doesnt mean it is working right....

 
no comment......




okay.. a few maybe...

if you are going to spend this kind of money, go with a good component set... a round cone has equal displacement, where-as an oval cone on a round coil inherently is not going to expel the energy equally..hence, the frequency of said oval cone is usually compensated for by multiple smaller drivers-- usually mounted coaxially and usually not "aim-able" so you lose the effect of creating a good sound stage in the first place.

A component set will go in the same place as a 6x9, it has the tweeter mounted seperatly so you may mount that on the same baffle as the round speaker or move it up onto the door or window pillar-- improving the sound stage and overall better frequency response...

IMO of course........................... Just because something "works" doesnt mean it is working right....
I have a 4 channel amp powering the front and rears (two 6x9s + two tweeters) and a mono channel amp for a sub. Im at that stage in life where I could care less for the sub so Im thinking about taking it out.

With that said, can I just buy a coaxial set since I already have the tweeters in the rears? or is a component set a "must"?

 
no comment......




okay.. a few maybe...

if you are going to spend this kind of money, go with a good component set... a round cone has equal displacement, where-as an oval cone on a round coil inherently is not going to expel the energy equally..hence, the frequency of said oval cone is usually compensated for by multiple smaller drivers-- usually mounted coaxially and usually not "aim-able" so you lose the effect of creating a good sound stage in the first place.

A component set will go in the same place as a 6x9, it has the tweeter mounted seperatly so you may mount that on the same baffle as the round speaker or move it up onto the door or window pillar-- improving the sound stage and overall better frequency response...

IMO of course........................... Just because something "works" doesnt mean it is working right....
Not 100% correct, but anyway....

People don't go for non round speakers due to stress. A circle has stress equally on all parts of the surround. When you use a square or oval your inhernetly making the cone less rigid since stress is no longer equal. At high excursion levels the cone can break up and you'll get distortion. Honestly, I don't really consider that the "biggest" reason. It's more or less that few companies have mid to high end offerings in non-round speakers, due to the inherent disadvantage. It's part of the reason kickers subs have low X-max, the square design has a Sd avantage, but you lose linear excursion.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

https://audioassemble.com/round-vs-oval-speakers/#:~:text=If%20you%20opt%20for%20a,it%20is%20small%20in%20size. This is what I found with a...
2
1K
I have an extra pair of these, NIB, $100 shipped!
14
3K
Excellent!! Looks to be in tact. It will be a workhorse for you man
40
5K
Might be time to try something new as it sounds like it is the limitaion of the speakers. I’m not in the habit of recommending JBL but a buddy of...
40
5K

About this thread

DSCLegend

Junior Member
Thread starter
DSCLegend
Joined
Location
USA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
6
Views
7,365
Last reply date
Last reply from
T3mpest
20240604_170857.jpg

metalheadjoe

    Jun 5, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20240605_200209_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

Dylan27

    Jun 5, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top