which is better?

helotaxi
5,000+ posts

Kilroy was Here
As with everything else, it depends. If you can find a quality two-channel amp that makes the power you need at the impedance you need then it is good. If a mono amp can do the same thing it is good. Most newer mono amps are class D and have a rather limited frequency range which eliminates them from use as a mid-high amp. They are also generally more powerful and much more efficient than a simularly priced two-channel amp and this suits them to sub duty. If you are looking for really high power, mono Class D is pretty much the only way to go. For a modestly powered system, a two-channel amp can drive subs just as well as mono.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

2.5 cubic feet per subwoofer not total. Those X's require some room.
7
538
Is American Bass better then Mmatts? Again I'm in love with quality and smoothness with alot of power and so far I'm Does the ABs have better quality then the Mmats? That's all im looking for is...
12
2K
Alpine, and it's not even close. I own that Alpine unit and the 9-band parametric EQ is much more useful than the 5-band graphic on the Pioneer. Adding the Alpine KTP-455U is a great way to...
1
745
First of all, I like 1Din, i don't like the latest releases, i prefer older models. I'll use the unit to play through USB only, no Bluetooth. Are both equally good or is one of them better?
0
594

About this thread

serg18

10+ year member
Bubblhead
Thread starter
serg18
Joined
Location
Norfolk, Va/ Covington, Ga
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
5
Views
423
Last reply date
Last reply from
limitkid7
92E04DB4-A2FA-4193-A353-6DE01343F057.jpeg

Lt Ye Htun Oo

    Feb 20, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
1708449173869.png

RobGMN

    Feb 20, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

Latest topics

Top