whats better

[snow96 10+ year member]

I mean, if you love the sound of a 1.2 Qtc, they don't need that much space //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

i have both of mine in seperate 1.5 boxes and they sound **** good....i have had 3 different amps on them...and to be honest nobody at P.V.A.M.U. can mess with me

well one dude but he done graduated and he had 3 15" L7's in his Regal...

ya'll say they need more space...how much more...

 

[namster44 10+ year member]

This may sound crazy to all of you especially to you snova031, but have any of you read the ratings and what not on the pioneer premier ts-w2000spl they are 140$ each which would fit your 300$ price range on subs. Take a look at them: http://www.etronics.com/product.asp?stk_code=piotsw2000spl&store=&catid=369
For an amp I have heard nothing bad about the lanzar d3000m you can get it for like 350$ shipped.

[/quote=Jeremy jl fan]

OR we could all buy sony subs and pyle amps and win comps with their amazing wangin power.

There's just so much better out there in terms of build quality and looks, that we already suggested mind you that he doesn't need to be comparing Pioneer sub with Kicker. And the Tsunami would tear that Lanzar a new one for about the same price.

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

agrees with nova

 

[Mr. Loki 5,000+ posts]

I agree the lanzar isnt the best, but its a decent amp. I would re-think about the new pioneer spl sub vs the kicker....its a beast for sure....and if you wanna be a dick then why not buy magnum d2's subs that will tear the kickers a new one?