SPLAudioHz
10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
I am looking at two flat subs for a light weight install in a 95 mustang.
Foundation: enclosure identical (IN LOOK AND MOUNT, NOT INTERNAL DESIGN) to the mach 460 rear deck enclosure.
Subs: Two 12s. Must be flat with low cu ft requirement.
Looking at:
Alpine SWR-T12:
fq response-26-200Hz
Power handling-600w rms
enclosure size-.68 gross internal cu ft each
Dynaudio MW190
fq response-25-800Hz
Power handling-200w rms
enclosure size-2 gross internal cu ft each (crazy I know)
The dyn is somewhat unrealistic in cu ft requirement, but I was wondering what is more important for sq. Although the subs will not be turned up all that much, as my front stage will handle most of the action, I am still curious is to what some of you audiophiles think.
Jesse
Foundation: enclosure identical (IN LOOK AND MOUNT, NOT INTERNAL DESIGN) to the mach 460 rear deck enclosure.
Subs: Two 12s. Must be flat with low cu ft requirement.
Looking at:
Alpine SWR-T12:
fq response-26-200Hz
Power handling-600w rms
enclosure size-.68 gross internal cu ft each
Dynaudio MW190
fq response-25-800Hz
Power handling-200w rms
enclosure size-2 gross internal cu ft each (crazy I know)
The dyn is somewhat unrealistic in cu ft requirement, but I was wondering what is more important for sq. Although the subs will not be turned up all that much, as my front stage will handle most of the action, I am still curious is to what some of you audiophiles think.
Jesse
