Really good try, but still not quite a snail shell. Getting a little warmer.
It's all variations on the same theme, it's not my problem you have a narrow, rigid definition of what a "snailshell" is, something you haven't actually described BTW.
Really good try, but still not quite a snail shell. Getting a little warmer.
I've been thinking that too. But chances are the people who buy them don't really care if they differ from a TL or not, they're just concerned with how "hard it bumps" //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
Is that a challenge?
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif![]()
126dB at 44Hz, in a station wagon, from two 4inch 5 watt rms midrange drivers, with an FS of around 100Hz...Again, to be a horn, it must provide acoustic gain, which I challenge you to achieve below 50-60hz.
You got a problem with people that drive station wagons?
No offense, but you're one of the few people in here that apparently knows why a SS is special... care to share?
I was still writing the other reply.guess that proves it. lol
ah, there's not much to do with a poorly designed transmission line //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifI didn't just "used to have one".Trust me, I've done a SHITLOAD more. Please know about someones experience before opening your keyboard lol.
I don't think you actually know anything. Your explination was so unbelieveably nondescript. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
That's why no-one ever gives two shits about these types of enclosures.
Then I challenge you to come sit in my vehicle and prove me wrong, when I strap on some 34hz notes on you at over 145db with a pair of 10's..........over 150db at 44hz.Been reading too many Hexibase posts lately?
I especially liked this part:
"you need to understand the effects of the vehicle on the horn design itself"
I couldn't agree more! By knowing the effects of the vehicle on the horn design, I realize that achieving any acoustic gain at typical sub frequencies is pretty well impossible.
A horn, by definition, must provide acoustic gain by converting high pressure/low velocity waves at the cone of the driver into low pressure/high velocity waves at the mouth of the horn. This simply cannot be done in a vehicle at low frequencies. Many are foolish and mistake the natural effects of cabin gain for acoustic gain provided by the horn. What most have done is taken a ported box, made it look like a horn, lowered turbulence at the termination point in the port, achieved more directivity and experienced cabin gain. Again, to be a horn, it must provide acoustic gain, which I challenge you to achieve below 50-60hz.