What does ca.com think?

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

You have said, many times now, that you would, as an employer, test for marijuana, But you've also said you wouldnt test for more pedestrian things like caffeine, cigs, or internet porn. If you think we, the readers of this thread, cant correlate that with you claiming weed IS worse than other things, then you think we are all as stupid as you.

Oh, you haven't said as an employer, that you would test for pot? You have, many times. And no, I dont believe you have said "I would not test for caffeine" but you certainly implied it when you told me I was foolish for comparing the two 'drugs'.
You are nothing more than hot air, word games, and circular logic.

Lol talk about contradicting yourself

And still, show me where I said I would test for marijuana //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

No reply even necessary, except to acknowledge what your next reply will undoubtedly be: "I never said Id test them! I only said I wouldn't hire them!"
I see right through your word games.

you don't see the difference between those two statements lol. You are one big joke lol

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

you don't see the difference between those two statements lol. You are one big joke lol

Yah, Im the joke here. Tell us again how marijuana affects people's jobs because they are thinking about it. Moron.

Lol talk about contradicting yourself
And still, show me where I said I would test for marijuana //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

You didnt say you'd test for it, you said you wouldn't hire them. Not implying you would test for it or anything, right? Clearly you have an innate ability to know who does, and does not, smoke pot. Yurr smart! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Let me know if you want to actually have a serious discussion on this topic, rather than play word games all day. Otherwise, you aren't worth much more of my time. Im confident you've done an adequate job of making yourself, and your argument here, look completely asinine, semantical, and argumentative, that I dont even need to address you any more.

Shoo, you have already succeeded in cluttering up what could have been a decent thread with nonsense and semantical word games. Im going to go do something more productive, ANYTHING more productive, like masturbate, or count the pieces of gravel in my driveway.

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

Yah, Im the joke here. Tell us again how marijuana affects people's jobs because they are thinking about it. Moron.

So now you're saying someone's work performance can't be affected by thinking about something else while working?

You didnt say you'd test for it, you said you wouldn't hire them. Not implying you would test for it or anything, right? Clearly you have an innate ability to know who does, and does not, smoke pot. Yurr smart! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

So now you're implying the only way to know if someone smokes weed is to test them for it?

Let me know if you want to actually have a serious discussion on this topic, rather than play word games all day. Otherwise, you aren't worth much more of my time. Im confident you've done an adequate job of making yourself, and your argument here, look completely asinine, semantical, and argumentative, that I dont even need to address you any more.

You claiming I said things I did not is me playing word games?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

You have said, many times now, that you would, as an employer, test for marijuana, But you've also said you wouldnt test for more pedestrian things like caffeine, cigs, or internet porn. If you think we, the readers of this thread, cant correlate that with you claiming weed IS worse than other things, then you think we are all as stupid as you.

Oh, you haven't said as an employer, that you would test for pot? You have, many times. And no, I dont believe you have said "I would not test for caffeine" but you certainly implied it when you told me I was foolish for comparing the two 'drugs'.
You are nothing more than hot air, word games, and circular logic.

You didnt say you'd test for it, you said you wouldn't hire them. Not implying you would test for it or anything, right? Clearly you have an innate ability to know who does, and does not, smoke pot. Yurr smart! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif:laugh://content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif:rotflol://content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/hilarious.gif.02a037aad04aa96f19982b298a3d70a8.gif:hilariou:

This is what you call me playing word games?

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

So now you're saying someone's work performance can't be affected by thinking about something else while working?

Nope, Im saying you suggest thinking about smoking their next joint will affect their job performance, but when asked why thinking about their next fuck or bag of Doritos isn't considered equally as 'harmful' to you, all we get is cricket chirps or changes of subject. Moron.

So now you're implying the only way to know if someone smokes weed is to test them for it?

Nope, Im implying that if someone doesn't display a poor work quality, there is no reason to test them for anything, assume anything, or discriminate against them for anything their private life includes. Moron.

You claiming I said things I did not is me playing word games?

Nope, you implying something and then claiming you didnt, is a word game. Moron.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif:laugh://content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif:rotflol://content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/hilarious.gif.02a037aad04aa96f19982b298a3d70a8.gif:hilariou:
This is what you call me playing word games?

Moron.

 

[bubbagumper6 5,000+ posts]

I'm a little late to the party but I just wanted to say your poll was confusing...The first post in this topic said "Is Marijuana any worse than alcohol?" so I voted no, but the actual poll was "Should Marijuana be legal?" in which case I would say yes...just thought I'd share

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

Nope, Im saying you suggest thinking about smoking their next joint will affect their job performance, but when asked why thinking about their next fuck or bag of Doritos isn't considered equally as 'harmful' to you, all we get is cricket chirps or changes of subject. Moron.

Oh really? I've already explained it if you bothered to read:

Then what was the point of saying it? It'd be like damn I'm thinking about food because I'm hungry, I can't wait to get off.

My response:

Did you even read the post? I said it could affect someones work performance. That's it. I didn't compare it to anything. The topic of the discussion was weed. If I was talking about alcohol the same thing would apply..

I said weed because we're talking about weed! I said the same thing could be said about anything else.

Again, why are you acting like I said weed is the only thing that could cause these problems? You have some reading problems or something. I never once said that weed is the only thing that can affect someones work performance.

Again:

People think about all sorts of things at work. You said it like thinking about smoking a doobie is worse than thinking about other things.

My response:

No you assumed that. The topic was weed. So I said weed. I never once said it's worse than anything

Yea this certainly looks like me changing the subject //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Nope, Im implying that if someone doesn't display a poor work quality, there is no reason to test them for anything, assume anything, or discriminate against them for anything their private life includes. Moron.

I never said I would just randomly test people for no reason lol. Let me guess I "implied" it right? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Nope, you implying something and then claiming you didnt, is a word game. Moron

You keep saying I said something I never said. And when I ask you to show me where I said it you realized you're wrong and say "well you didn't say it but you implied it" lol.

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

Moron.

You flip flop and backtrack more than a politician and I'm the moron? Why don't you explain what I quoted in post #381?

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/hilarious.gif.02a037aad04aa96f19982b298a3d70a8.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif:rotflol:

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I'm a little late to the party but I just wanted to say your poll was confusing...The first post in this topic said "Is Marijuana any worse than alcohol?" so I voted no, but the actual poll was "Should Marijuana be legal?" in which case I would say yes...just thought I'd share

I know, but there is a question above that. It's cool though.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Late night crowd chime in....

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Oh really? I've already explained it if you bothered to read:


My response:

Again:

My response:

Yea this certainly looks like me changing the subject //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

I never said I would just randomly test people for no reason lol. Let me guess I "implied" it right? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

You keep saying I said something I never said. And when I ask you to show me where I said it you realized you're wrong and say "well you didn't say it but you implied it" lol.

You flip flop and backtrack more than a politician and I'm the moron? Why don't you explain what I quoted in post #381?
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/hilarious.gif.02a037aad04aa96f19982b298a3d70a8.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif:rotflol:

My God, you just wont shut up, will you? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
We've wasted enough time going back and forth with your "I didnt say that, and you cant prove what I meant!" games. I doubt anyone here cares what either of us think on this topic beyond what we've already said by now.

As for post 381, again, implications and meanings of things said seems to be a shell game to you. You seem to think you can say anything, and then back track if called on it. *yawn*

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

My God, you just wont shut up, will you? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
We've wasted enough time going back and forth with your "I didnt say that, and you cant prove what I meant!" games. I doubt anyone here cares what either of us think on this topic beyond what we've already said by now.

As for post 381, again, implications and meanings of things said seems to be a shell game to you. You seem to think you can say anything, and then back track if called on it. *yawn*

Lol You completely dodged everything I said. I love when people can't admit they were wrong about anything even when it's shoved in there face.