Prosecution is part of what I do for a living.I guess you better go to law school and become a prosecuting attorney. You got alllllllll the answers. Like the answer on how the dumbasss that got shot while pointing a pistol at Kyle was "protecting" the person who got shot before him... how exactly was this person "protecting" dead man?
Sooooooooooooooooooooooo libertard 2nd amendment abolitionist.... Kyle should have let these people beat him? Possibly to death right?Prosecution is part of what I do for a living.
Protecting others from Kyle. Unless the dead man was the only one there? Oh yeah, there were multiple people.
Kyle shoots unarmed man dead. That makes him a credible threat to others. Pistol guy would have been within his rights to put as many needed COM to stop the credible threat if Kyle was still holding the rifle.
So after this idiot attacked Kyle and Kyle began to defend himself by shooting, the aggressor now turned coward turned to escape the bullets... but like everything else he attempted in life, failed.
So this guy was just standing there waiting to be shot in the back? I am asking because the other two people he shot were chasing him and attempting to harm him. The guy you are speaking of was the first guy shot, correct?The guy never put his hands on Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse even admitted it during the trial. Do you do any research or is that my job to do your research?
Prosecution is part of what I do for a living.
Protecting others from Kyle. Unless the dead man was the only one there? Oh yeah, there were multiple people.
Kyle shoots unarmed man dead. That makes him a credible threat to others. Pistol guy would have been within his rights to put as many needed COM to stop the credible threat if Kyle was still holding the rifle.
I support the 2A fully. It’s in the COTUS. Stop living by your feelings, beliefs, or opinions.Sooooooooooooooooooooooo libertard 2nd amendment abolitionist.... Kyle should have let these people beat him? Possibly to death right?
So this guy was just standing there waiting to be shot in the back? I am asking because the other two people he shot were chasing him and attempting to harm him. The guy you are speaking of was the first guy shot, correct?
They began to harass him when he tried to put out the fire in the dumpster. They did not attack him because he was armed. He was trying to keep the people who were actually committing crimes from burning down yet another city. Like I said, it would apparently be ok with you if he was unarmed and beat to death for trying to stop these criminals. I am sure you were just as ok with all the looting and crimes that happened "in the name of George Floyd" too huh.I support the 2A fully. It’s in the COTUS. Stop living by your feelings, beliefs, or opinions.
Kyle was illegally armed. If he had not been breaking the law, no one would have been attempting to beat him after he shot an unarmed man.
Who hired him to protect this used car lot, and was he on the property when the shooting occurred ?
Was he licensed to carry a gun?
So if he didn't trip then the guy hitting him with the skateboard wouldn't have been trying to hit him? Huh? The guy with the Glock wouldn't have pointed the gun at him? So, because he is not "athletic" he is at fault... huh?Yes. If Rittenhouse had any athletic ability then he wouldn't have tripped running down the street and the other two guys wouldn't have been shot. In fact, if he would've stayed at the scene of the first shooting and administered aid then the other two guys wouldn't have been shot either. He was there to administer aid to injured people right? That's what he said he was there for since he was a certified EMT. Why didn't he call the Police and tell them that he just shot somebody? Why in the World would he call his buddy other than to brag about it?
Answer my questions, if you would.They began to harass him when he tried to put out the fire in the dumpster. They did not attack him because he was armed. He was trying to keep the people who were actually committing crimes from burning down yet another city. Like I said, it would apparently be ok with you if he was unarmed and beat to death for trying to stop these criminals. I am sure you were just as ok with all the looting and crimes that happened "in the name of George Floyd" too huh.
Why, what's the point. You avoid questions. I can too. Oh wait... your questions are all rhetorical. I am off to bed.Answer my questions, if you would.
They speak directly to the situation and the legality of what he did.
You won’t answer because the answers indicate Kyle was in the wrong.Why, what's the point. You avoid questions. I can too. Oh wait... your questions are all rhetorical. I am off to bed.