Very similar RE(SX)--SPLW12

[SPL140.2 5,000+ posts]

RE SX--SPLW12

Fs-30.6---30.58hz

Qms-4.7--4.86

Qes-.32--.365

Qts-.30--.3394

xbl motor--?

xmax-21?mm--17.78mm

spl-88.1--90

Both drivers are very similar in the t/s parameters //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif RE has the advantage of the xbl motor (more xmax) where as the SPLW12 has the advantage of efficiency/price. Pretty close id say //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif Of course their are many other factors but by looking at the specs theyre both very similar. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

Click to read more...

 

[UndercoverPunk 5,000+ posts]

I thought the SX didn't have and XBL^2 motor... and it doesn't.

YOU MADE AN ERROR!!!! just playing...

You really like them SPL subs don't ya?

 

[Nukedsodapop 5,000+ posts]

Those were the first subs i actually wanted, The SPLW12s i think thats the model IIRC

 

[SPL140.2 5,000+ posts]

I thought the SX didn't have and XBL^2 motor... and it doesn't.
YOU MADE AN ERROR!!!! just playing...

You really like them SPL subs don't ya?

Sure do //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif I was really impressed with the ML line. They took 800 wrms daily and are rated for 600wrms. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif Good bang I must say.

 

[ntense702 10+ year member]

good information, never would of thought they were alike

 

[SPL140.2 5,000+ posts]

good information, never would of thought they were alike

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[req 5,000+ posts]

they can take way more than 600 too. basically a rebadged PA MOFO sub with dual 1ohm coils.

 

[TeamPSI 10+ year member]

Remember...

Just because a company publishes a set of t/s parameters doesn't mean they are correct or even close to what the subwoofer actually is. I can name off quite a few companies whose specs are 100% wrong or just "manipulated" a bit.

 

[PV Audio 5,000+ posts]

like yours?

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[Acidburn 5,000+ posts]

Remember...Just because a company publishes a set of t/s parameters doesn't mean they are correct or even close to what the subwoofer actually is. I can name off quite a few companies whose specs are 100% wrong or just "manipulated" a bit.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/omg.gif.05aa02c3095d6ce9338996654eca0863.gif thats naughty!

 

[Nukedsodapop 5,000+ posts]

just like the girl in your sig.... i give up watching though, i dont think shes ever taking it off..

 

[NDMstang65 10+ year member]

Remember...Just because a company publishes a set of t/s parameters doesn't mean they are correct or even close to what the subwoofer actually is. I can name off quite a few companies whose specs are 100% wrong or just "manipulated" a bit.

****...beat me to it

DD is **** good at publishing "manipulated" t/s parameters...cause they model so **** good!...too bad leap say otherwise... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif