How much of our govt's yearly income do you think is spent on Nasa? If anything, NASA needs to spend more, advertising all the new technology its brought into our lives thanks to an active space program.I vote we shut down NASA for one year. I think as much money as they waste on stupid crap like bombing the moon, we would be out of debt after one year, hahaha.
???What has been axed? The mandate? If the mandate is officially axed the bill has no funding....
Judge Voids Key Element of Obama Health Care LawA federal judge in Virginia ruled on Monday that the keystone provision in the Obama health care law is unconstitutional
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/14/health/policy/14health.html
WTF are you talking about? It's dead. Unless the SCOTUS overturns it (unlikely), it's dead. Forever. Dead. Congress does not have the power to do that.That is not the final ruling on that. Just means more than likely the supreme court can not throw the case out without being heard.
The supreme court has not heard the case at all and more than likely won't for 9 to 24 months the score on it in federal court is 4 say it's constitutional 1 says its not........If what you say were true why have a few more states piled on since over the same condition. If it were settled it would make no sense to do so.WTF are you talking about? It's dead. Unless the SCOTUS overturns it (unlikely), it's dead. Forever. Dead. Congress does not have the power to do that.
Next!
What else do you have to bitch about in the "health care"? I think it's all just a lot of hot wind that will add up to nothing except more debt. Lots of ammo for the partisans to throw mud at each other with, but that's it.
Speak engrish much? Your post makes no sense at all. WTF does the states have to do with a federal court case? Nothing. The provision is dead. The supreme's could choose to hear, reopen and reverse, but there is no requirement for them to do so. It's been ruled UnConstitutional. That provision is dead. It will stay that way unless the SCOTUS overturns it. That's a long shot. IMO, it's not going to happen because it is so UnConstitutional. It would be a gross expansion of the Comerce Clause that is already been ***** and whored out to mean almost anything.The supreme court has not heard the case at all and more than likely won't for 9 to 24 months the score on it in federal court is 4 say it's constitutional 1 says its not........If what you say were true why have a few more states piled on since over the same condition. If it were settled it would make no sense to do so.
Did the judge issue an injunction baring enforcement of the provision?Speak engrish much? Your post makes no sense at all. WTF does the states have to do with a federal court case? Nothing. The provision is dead. The supreme's could choose to hear, reopen and reverse, but there is no requirement for them to do so. It's been ruled UnConstitutional. That provision is dead. It will stay that way unless the SCOTUS overturns it. That's a long shot. IMO, it's not going to happen because it is so UnConstitutional. It would be a gross expansion of the Comerce Clause that is already been ***** and whored out to mean almost anything.
The question still stands. For the 3rd time. What else is your complaint about "unConstitutional" about what's left? I don't see ****, except a lot of hot air. No substance from either side. The attacks are as silly as the bill itself.
Did any of the judges that ruled either way issue an injunction or enforcement?Speak engrish much? Your post makes no sense at all. WTF does the states have to do with a federal court case? Nothing. The provision is dead. The supreme's could choose to hear, reopen and reverse, but there is no requirement for them to do so. It's been ruled UnConstitutional. That provision is dead. It will stay that way unless the SCOTUS overturns it. That's a long shot. IMO, it's not going to happen because it is so UnConstitutional. It would be a gross expansion of the Comerce Clause that is already been ***** and whored out to mean almost anything.
The question still stands. For the 3rd time. What else is your complaint about "unConstitutional" about what's left? I don't see ****, except a lot of hot air. No substance from either side. The attacks are as silly as the bill itself.
Is the gov't enforcing the provision? I didn't get my fine for not having gov't approved insurance. Did you?Did the judge issue an injunction baring enforcement of the provision?