Unconstitutional

I vote we shut down NASA for one year. I think as much money as they waste on stupid crap like bombing the moon, we would be out of debt after one year, hahaha.

 
I vote we shut down NASA for one year. I think as much money as they waste on stupid crap like bombing the moon, we would be out of debt after one year, hahaha.
How much of our govt's yearly income do you think is spent on Nasa? If anything, NASA needs to spend more, advertising all the new technology its brought into our lives thanks to an active space program.

 
That is not the final ruling on that. Just means more than likely the supreme court can not throw the case out without being heard.
WTF are you talking about? It's dead. Unless the SCOTUS overturns it (unlikely), it's dead. Forever. Dead. Congress does not have the power to do that.

Next!

What else do you have to bitch about in the "health care"? I think it's all just a lot of hot wind that will add up to nothing except more debt. Lots of ammo for the partisans to throw mud at each other with, but that's it.

 
WTF are you talking about? It's dead. Unless the SCOTUS overturns it (unlikely), it's dead. Forever. Dead. Congress does not have the power to do that.
Next!

What else do you have to bitch about in the "health care"? I think it's all just a lot of hot wind that will add up to nothing except more debt. Lots of ammo for the partisans to throw mud at each other with, but that's it.
The supreme court has not heard the case at all and more than likely won't for 9 to 24 months the score on it in federal court is 4 say it's constitutional 1 says its not........If what you say were true why have a few more states piled on since over the same condition. If it were settled it would make no sense to do so.

 
The Repubs will dismantle this POS piece by piece...it will take time but they will do it...everyone has conveniently forgotten how the Dumbocrats passed this new entitlement...they certainly couldn't do it with a straight up or down vote.

 
The supreme court has not heard the case at all and more than likely won't for 9 to 24 months the score on it in federal court is 4 say it's constitutional 1 says its not........If what you say were true why have a few more states piled on since over the same condition. If it were settled it would make no sense to do so.
Speak engrish much? Your post makes no sense at all. WTF does the states have to do with a federal court case? Nothing. The provision is dead. The supreme's could choose to hear, reopen and reverse, but there is no requirement for them to do so. It's been ruled UnConstitutional. That provision is dead. It will stay that way unless the SCOTUS overturns it. That's a long shot. IMO, it's not going to happen because it is so UnConstitutional. It would be a gross expansion of the Comerce Clause that is already been ***** and whored out to mean almost anything.

The question still stands. For the 3rd time. What else is your complaint about "unConstitutional" about what's left? I don't see ****, except a lot of hot air. No substance from either side. The attacks are as silly as the bill itself.

 
Speak engrish much? Your post makes no sense at all. WTF does the states have to do with a federal court case? Nothing. The provision is dead. The supreme's could choose to hear, reopen and reverse, but there is no requirement for them to do so. It's been ruled UnConstitutional. That provision is dead. It will stay that way unless the SCOTUS overturns it. That's a long shot. IMO, it's not going to happen because it is so UnConstitutional. It would be a gross expansion of the Comerce Clause that is already been ***** and whored out to mean almost anything.

The question still stands. For the 3rd time. What else is your complaint about "unConstitutional" about what's left? I don't see ****, except a lot of hot air. No substance from either side. The attacks are as silly as the bill itself.
Did the judge issue an injunction baring enforcement of the provision?

 
Speak engrish much? Your post makes no sense at all. WTF does the states have to do with a federal court case? Nothing. The provision is dead. The supreme's could choose to hear, reopen and reverse, but there is no requirement for them to do so. It's been ruled UnConstitutional. That provision is dead. It will stay that way unless the SCOTUS overturns it. That's a long shot. IMO, it's not going to happen because it is so UnConstitutional. It would be a gross expansion of the Comerce Clause that is already been ***** and whored out to mean almost anything.

The question still stands. For the 3rd time. What else is your complaint about "unConstitutional" about what's left? I don't see ****, except a lot of hot air. No substance from either side. The attacks are as silly as the bill itself.
Did any of the judges that ruled either way issue an injunction or enforcement?

 
Audiolife, you know you are just talking to yourself at this point, right? When you start to make sense they run like startled rabbits. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

AlterEgo99

5,000+ posts
Streaming consciousness
Thread starter
AlterEgo99
Joined
Location
Domie Homie
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
660
Views
7,026
Last reply date
Last reply from
audiolife
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top