Trying to hold da black man down!

[bones22 5,000+ posts]

So filing charges, issuing citations isn't considered prosecution... interesting.

no its not. prosecution comes from the States Atty/DA

cops do the leg work so to speak. they are there to enforce the laws and if someone breaks it then its in the hands of the states atty/DA to proceed with prosecution.

 

[wat 10+ year member]

so a black man sees white cops, and immediately pulls out the race card. thats original //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 

[thegreatestpenn 5,000+ posts]

So you're basing your legislative knowledge on movies...
Tard.

no I'm basing it on the law, something you probably know nothing about. but since all you know how to do is throw out useless commentary and insults, maybe you have a career in talk-radio or comedy //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/thumbsup.gif.3287b36ca96645a13a43aff531f37f02.gif

 

[davesexplorer 10+ year member]

An officer only does the first part, not the second. The DA may use the officer's testimony as evidence, but the officer does not pursue until final judgement. You need both parts.

An officer, in a summary trial (at least here in PA) does initiate prosecution via traffic citation, non-traffic citation or criminal complaint and does follow/pursue the case until final disposition and reports the results to complete the report. The district attorney is not involved 99% of the time in these cases, and as such the officer is acting as the prosecutor on behalf of the commonwealth. (Again here in PA, where I am familiar.)

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

An officer, in a summary trial (at least here in PA) does initiate prosecution via traffic citation, non-traffic citation or criminal complaint and does follow/pursue the case until final disposition and reports the results to complete the report. The district attorney is not involved 99% of the time in these cases, and as such the officer is acting as the prosecutor on behalf of the commonwealth. (Again here in PA, where I am familiar.)

lol at your looking it up or thinking about it.

and you said you were done

lol @ you!

 

[wat 10+ year member]

he mad

 

[davesexplorer 10+ year member]

lol at your looking it up or thinking about it.
and you said you were done

lol @ you!

Ha what can I say you got me going. I did have to think about it for a second, along with reading the hummingbird thread wondering why crx wants to kill them.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

Ha what can I say you got me going. I did have to think about it for a second, along with reading the hummingbird thread wondering why crx wants to kill them.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

I like how you reached for a weaksauce example like a traffic ticket when discussing burglary.

 

[bones22 5,000+ posts]

no I'm basing it on the law, something you probably know nothing about. but since all you know how to do is throw out useless commentary and insults, maybe you have a career in talk-radio or comedy //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/thumbsup.gif.3287b36ca96645a13a43aff531f37f02.gif

you are spouting off nonsense. the cops may have had the wrong person or house but they were called out to a break in. the guy deserved to be arrested for a couple reasons.

1. refusing to cooperate

2. refusing at first to provide id

3. jumping to the "im black someone save me" speach. which im sure wasnt simply saying it. the way the article reads he was probably being loud enough all his neighbors could hear. depending on how loud he was being he can be arrested for that.

all 3 of those reasons fit the charge the article says he was arrested for.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

you are spouting off nonsense. the cops may have had the wrong person or house but they were called out to a break in. the guy deserved to be arrested for a couple reasons. 1. refusing to cooperate

2. refusing at first to provide id

3. jumping to the "im black someone save me" speach. which im sure wasnt simply saying it. the way the article reads he was probably being loud enough all his neighbors could hear. depending on how loud he was being he can be arrested for that.

all 3 of those reasons fit the charge the article says he was arrested for.

Glad the amendment against illegal searches and seizures doesn't limit any of this police power.

 

[thegreatestpenn 5,000+ posts]

you are spouting off nonsense. the cops may have had the wrong person or house but they were called out to a break in. the guy deserved to be arrested for a couple reasons. 1. refusing to cooperate

2. refusing at first to provide id

3. jumping to the "im black someone save me" speach. which im sure wasnt simply saying it. the way the article reads he was probably being loud enough all his neighbors could hear. depending on how loud he was being he can be arrested for that.

all 3 of those reasons fit the charge the article says he was arrested for.

I'm not spouting nonsense, police cannot enter private property without a warrant, period.

Was the said person a jackass? yeah. Was the bigotry claim towards the police jumping the gun (the woman that called the cops deserves that)? of course.

But Did the homeowner break the law in any way? no he did not.

 

[bones22 5,000+ posts]

Glad the amendment against illegal searches and seizures doesn't limit any of this police power.

you are failing to pay attention to the key point of the arrest. the cops were called out to a suspected break in. all he had to do was talk to the cops and provide id when asked for it. instead he decided to make a scene. the most recent article says charges were dropped anyway. no doubt because he screamed racisim was the cause. theres nothing to show that it was at all. i hope his house gets broke into and then he expects the same dept to help him then.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

you are failing to pay attention to the key point of the arrest. the cops were called out to a suspected break in. all he had to do was talk to the cops and provide id when asked for it. instead he decided to make a scene. the most recent article says charges were dropped anyway. no doubt because he screamed racisim was the cause. theres nothing to show that it was at all. i hope his house gets broke into and then he expects the same dept to help him then.

He doesn't have to let the cops into the house, nor provide identification, without a warrant.

 

[bones22 5,000+ posts]

I'm not spouting nonsense, police cannot enter private property without a warrant, period.Was the said person a jackass? yeah. Was the bigotry claim towards the police jumping the gun (the woman that called the cops deserves that)? of course.

But Did the homeowner break the law in any way? no he did not.

nobody ever said the woman that called was white. she could be any race.

and yes he was being disorderly and refusing to cooperate so yes he broke the law.

 

[bones22 5,000+ posts]

He doesn't have to let the cops into the house, nor provide identification, without a warrant.

you really need to check into the law then. you are required to be able to show proof of who you are if asked. if you can not or will not then you can be arrested. it would be a slap on the wrist but that is the law.