Tony Parker > Steve Nash

[bigbangtheory 5,000+ posts]

Ment to say Latrell Spreewell, I always get those two mixed up.

They still made it to the playoffs, which is still better than not. So at time they were making money and hoping to contend and looked like they would have take it all in 04.

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

well i find it humerous you mention wally like he was/is good.

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

also garnett won the mvp in 04 so this is even more silly.

 

[bigbangtheory 5,000+ posts]

also garnett won the mvp in 04 so this is even more silly.

I know he won it in 04 dumbass!

Never said Wally was good. He was a nice addition to have because Wally always could spread out the ball and used to be very good at the 3 pointer. I haven't kept up with him as of late being he got traded, but he has had some good years in Minnesota.

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

I know he won it in 04 dumbass!
Never said Wally was good. He was a nice addition to have because Wally always could spread out the ball and used to be very good at the 3 pointer. I haven't kept up with him as of late being he got traded, but he has had some good years in Minnesota.

ok i'm just done talking about garnett in this thread. garnett for mvp is the most retarded thing i ever heard.

 

[bigbangtheory 5,000+ posts]

ok i'm just done talking about garnett in this thread. garnett for mvp is the most retarded thing i ever heard.

I was just using him as an example that he could have been MVP if Minnesota was a decent team. Same with Bryant, they werent anything special and he had amazing numbers, but he wouldnt get the nod. You take these people of these teams and they win a handful of games. My point to the system being flawed. Like I said since they are on this theory as long as you are on the best team and you are the best player you are going to win is retarded. Should be about who helped their team the most. Cause you could still take Dirk away and they could have a pretty good season. Cause Howard would turn into a star and Terry still doing his thing and they have a decent bench.

 

[masone 10+ year member]

if the cavs had a record like dallas did this regular season you would be mad *** hell if lebron didnt get it:fyi:

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

eh parker plays defense and actually has 2 rings lol but i would probably say nash over parker. also you might be suprised who is #3 in playoff points scored before their 25th birthday. in all honesty though i would take kidd over both. he can play defense score rebound and dish out assists.

 

[quest51210 10+ year member]

eh parker plays defense and actually has 2 rings lol but i would probably say nash over parker. also you might be suprised who is #3 in playoff points scored before their 25th birthday. in all honesty though i would take kidd over both. he can play defense score rebound and dish out assists.

but no rings=crap

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

but no rings=crap

every year kidd has been in jersey his front court (4 and 5 spot) has probably been the worst in the league. nash got out of dallas and frankly im not so sure if he was with them still that they would be better as he is a liability on defense. once you start playing better teams you cant simply out score them without getting stops. hence why they dont go far in the playoffs unless they get a good draw.

 

[bigbangtheory 5,000+ posts]

if the cavs had a record like dallas did this regular season you would be mad *** hell if lebron didnt get it:fyi:

How their theory is now, yep I probably would have been, but like you said if it was better and it isnt, so the system is flawed to hell and back.

 

[quest51210 10+ year member]

Go Spurs Go!

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

i'd take kidd in his prime, but not the kidd of today.

 

[quest51210 10+ year member]

i like the cavs cuz they been goin the spurs route...one franchise player and a bunch of mediocre role players who were late first or second round pics who have potential. the rest falls into place...detroit followed the path as well. would love to see the pistons v. spurs in the finals yet again

 

[masone 10+ year member]

since voting is done by 125 members of a committee made up of sports analysts and such its hard for me to think the system is flawed. Such as say the BCS is flawed since it in fact is a computer. I personally think these committee members from all over the US and Canada most likey vote from what they see throughout the year.... leadership, wins, etc... I would much rather have basketball experts come together rather than say a computer.... i do think that dirk isnt most the irrefutable mvp of all time but i do think hands down he was the best choice for this years mvp