To the libs who believe obama's policies work

[Imtjnotu 5,000+ posts]

Sad thing is he is posting political bullshiit and and acting like it's the only truth....

 

[pro-rabbit 5,000+ posts]

Sad thing is he is posting political bullshiit and and acting like it's the only truth....

Since when do those two words go together?

Which is my point. He attacks me then defends by saying my statement is to "general" and brings nothing to the topic. However, my statements directly correlate with the topic.

What can you do. To each their own at this point I suppose.

Can be we bash the next 100 Presidents? It will be over 1 of 5 topics like it always is every year.

 

[bubbagumper6 5,000+ posts]

You will never 'win' an argument with him, he'll just insist you're trolling him and hurl insults till you finally just stop giving a fuck and put him on ignore...

 

[pro-rabbit 5,000+ posts]

You will never 'win' an argument with him, he'll just insist you're trolling him and hurl insults till you finally just stop giving a fuck and put him on ignore...

Outside the dome we actually agree on several things. The dome is when we really start to have different views. I see no reason to block him though. I find his devotion to his belief to be interesting.

 

[dooski 10+ year member]

 

[ahole-ic]

Sad thing is he is posting political bullshiit and and acting like it's the only truth....

If it's not, why are you all trolling instead of rebutting it with facts?

 

[pro-rabbit 5,000+ posts]

If it's not, why are you all trolling instead of rebutting it with facts?

You mean statistics. As we learned earlier. They are very different.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

First off, Iraq was (and is) a generally secular society, it did not abide by sharia law. Women were free to persue education, and many did. That is a canard. Not defending saddam's fantasies, but there was (and is) much more to that country than the cartoon images that most ignant (sic) 'mericans were fed. There was ZERO evidence of ANY involvement of AQ until after the invasion. AQ was more about the Saudis and fundamentalist wahaabi sects, not Suuni or shia internicene sruggles.Second off, there are at least 4000 American mothers who might disagree when they go visit their chidren's graves.

Have you been there and talked to the locals?

Just curious

 

[ahole-ic]

Since when do those two words go together?

Which is my point. He attacks me then defends by saying my statement is to "general" and brings nothing to the topic. However, my statements directly correlate with the topic.

What can you do. To each their own at this point I suppose.

Can be we bash the next 100 Presidents? It will be over 1 of 5 topics like it always is every year.

I was very specific. I quoted where you were not and you never made any attempt to clarify. There was no way to rebut because you didn't specifically say anything at all.

 

[ahole-ic]

You mean statistics. As we learned earlier. They are very different.

I think maybe because you're saying it and you know what you mean, that you assume that your comments could only be taken the way you mean them. Even by this statement a person could ask themselves: Is he saying that absolute truth cannot be determined because eyewitnesses to an accident will have different accounts, or is he saying that we should all give up and let the government run amuck because all statistics are slanted to make us believe whatever they want? (I believe earlier you stated it was the latter, which in itself is troubling that you would have such a defeatist attitude, but I just wanted to show you how such general statements could be taken a number of ways. You need to specify.... we cannot read your mind.)

 

[pro-rabbit 5,000+ posts]

Indeed for a large part I do mean the latter.(Yes I hate to think that way, but I have seen a limited behind the scenes shot of what goes on, from that I have lost faith in our current political system.) I see what your saying, however, this plays into another point which I made about the video clip.

When you take one small part of a conversation and use it as an example out of context it can be construed in many ways.

 

[Imtjnotu 5,000+ posts]

If it's not, why are you all trolling instead of rebutting it with facts?

Lulz how am I trolling hahaha bubba was right

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

What pisses me off is that no one in politics seems to be for the betterment of the country.

 

[ahole-ic]

Lulz how am I trolling hahaha bubba was right

I just explained it. You insist on doing ANYTHING other than rebutting what I said with facts. It doesn't matter if it's try to put me down or whatever... it's ANYTHING but actually using something verifiable.

 

[ahole-ic]

Indeed for a large part I do mean the latter.(Yes I hate to think that way, but I have seen a limited behind the scenes shot of what goes on, from that I have lost faith in our current political system.) I see what your saying, however, this plays into another point which I made about the video clip.
When you take one small part of a conversation and use it as an example out of context it can be construed in many ways.

It was very clear what he said. He tried to spin it all in a positive light, but he clearly admitted that it didn't work. Also, there is STILL money in that stimulus fund.... that needed to be spent IMMEDIATELY according to obama in order to save the country. If it worked, or if it all needed to be spent, ALL of the money would have been spent. Shovel ready WOULD have been as shovel ready as they thought, and unemployment would have never exceeded 8%. So say what you want but the clip proves it.