To the libs who believe obama's policies work

[ahole-ic]

To clarify for you two with helmets on. A link that explains, validates, and verifies a claim made in a topic bolsters the person's credit. It can be challenged with a conflicting link of the same or better information. A link to a propaganda site that says "obama got more peoples on social security" has no credibility. They are not at all the same thing. That's like me linking you to a GWB fan site that says "GWB is the best president EVAR!!!" Same credibility goes with it. I realize you two cannot comprehend this... but that does not make it not true. It just confirms that the only people intellectually destroyed in this thread are you guys.

 

[MANTI5 10+ year member]

To clarify for you two with helmets on. A link that explains, validates, and verifies a claim made in a topic bolsters the person's credit. It can be challenged with a conflicting link of the same or better information. A link to a propaganda site that says "obama got more peoples on social security" has no credibility. They are not at all the same thing. That's like me linking you to a GWB fan site that says "GWB is the best president EVAR!!!" Same credibility goes with it. I realize you two cannot comprehend this... but that does not make it not true. It just confirms that the only people intellectually destroyed in this thread are you guys.

So sad to have to repeat myself but you really are a brick wall. You find links that support your opinion and when others do the same it's false information. False ONLY because you disagree with it. Statistics are spun both ways, you're just as wrong and right as everyone else. Audioholic has shown your personality flaws and how they effect your arguments. Work on those then maybe one day you'll be able to have more rational conversations.

 

[ahole-ic]

So sad to have to repeat myself but you really are a brick wall. You find links that support your opinion and when others do the same it's false information. False ONLY because you disagree with it. Statistics are spun both ways, you're just as wrong and right as everyone else. Audioholic has shown your personality flaws and how they effect your arguments. Work on those then maybe one day you'll be able to have more rational conversations.

You aren't listening junior. Nobody posted any statistics which is what made their links irrelevant. Nobody effectively contested my links. You are biased and butthurt. It's ok. I've shown you for what you are many times. Audioholic didn't do any such thing. He opposed me in a much more effective and intelligent way than anyone else in this thread. That doesn't validate his claims. I defended myself quite well from those. If you weren't such a liberal who was hell bent on destroying anyone who had the ability to explain why what you believe is so off-base, you would see that. Since you believe what you believe because you refuse to listen to logic it is no wonder you are behaving so ignorantly. You are hilarious though. Your replies are so incoherent that they are always good for a belly laugh.

 

[MANTI5 10+ year member]

ad nauseum

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

You ignored my argument and chose to continue with yours, which is irrelevant. Where is an enemy combatant's life guaranteed under the Declaration of Independence?

Ah, so your reasoning for being pro-life is one of legality, not morality. Interesting.

I do not have time to fill out a full reply this evening.

 

[Scratchy 10+ year member]

How do you stand on creationism?

You seriously come across as actually being that obtuse.

 

[ahole-ic]

How do you stand on creationism?You seriously come across as actually being that obtuse.

What does my view on creationism have to do with anything? Seriously, the name calling is pathetic and is making you, rather than me look bad.

 

[Scratchy 10+ year member]

Because it would establish a baseline of credibility, or further expose your gullibility and belief in voodoo.

 

[Scratchy 10+ year member]

Also, calling you obtuse isn't calling you a name, it is more of an apt descriptor of your ideology, and it's obvious hypocrisies.

Like calling a duck a duck.

QUACK QUACK!

 

[brodeisel 10+ year member]

Also, calling you obtuse isn't calling you a name, it is more of an apt descriptor of your ideology, and it's obvious hypocrisies.Like calling a duck a duck.

QUACK QUACK!

fvckl off

 

[Scratchy 10+ year member]

Come at me, Ese!

 

[brodeisel 10+ year member]

Come at me, Ese!

lick my azzhole buddy

 

[Scratchy 10+ year member]

Hey eCrack, with these kind of allies, your linguistic repartee will surely continue to wither!

Wow...Bro, are you related to that 'tard what who shot up his spawn's laptop on teh fayce-buk?