ngsm13 5,000+ posts
BSEE
Keep in mind, this is simply in YOUR application. But if you knew the whole story... you'd also know Scottie gained a FUK TON switching to MT's... like... A LOT. Lawl...
nG
nG
uhh, ok?Keep in mind, this is simply in YOUR application. But if you knew the whole story... you'd also know Scottie gained a FUK TON switching to MT's... like... A LOT. Lawl...
nG
Just stating that's there's TONS of other drivers (Including MT's) that are much better suited for SPL. Great job getting yours loud though //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifuhh, ok?i agree 100% that for pure SPL, MTs are louder. never in debate here.
also, my app is the only one ive done a comparison on (SX vs. XXX), however it's an enclosure in a relatively small vehicle, with subs facing forwards, port facing forwards, mic on the dash.
scottie gained alot, but he also did alot more to the enclosure to gain more, so it wasnt a direct swap, imho.
my point is it gets old hearing people say the XXX is not a good SPL driver, when it is. as a matter of fact, my SXs were louder than my strokers, and the XXXs are louder than my SXs. and, that the brahma extreme is the same driver as the XXX.
so, what's your point, if i may ask?
Just stating that's there's TONS of other drivers (Including MT's) that are much better suited for SPL. Great job getting yours loud though //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
nG
well, back then, everyone in SPL competition was running a tremendous amount of drivers, with huge amounts of power. but there were 2 problems:howd you do that?!
I'm 100% aware of all your assertions.thanks for the compliments, guys.
however, i dont know if there are "tons" of drivers better suited for SPL. the stroker is "still" an excellent SPL driver, and it spanks the shiat out of it.
look at the build of the XXX: huge motor, sturdy frame, SUPER stiff cone assembly (same assembly as the MT, i might add), very high power handling, great excursion (though not strictly SPL related).
im sure this could be debated for eons, and im not trying to take anything away from you. ive been in this game for a long, long time, and while im not trying to argue with you or question your knowledge, the XXX is a capable driver. sure the MT is louder, SPL wise, but will not sound as good, imho. same can be said for the atomics, or the higher end digital designs stuff.
again, there's some drivers that are louder, but they dont sound near as good
another interesting point to consider: 90% of it is STILL install. this may sound like bragging, but im still the first person, in legal competition, to pop 150 with 2 10s. and they were JL 10W0s, with 150 watts on each, in the hatch of an escort, legal, mic on dash, car sealed up. in 1997.
not bragging, just qualifying my statements
coolI'm 100% aware of all your assertions.
I've owned numerous XXX's, as well as an SX, and a few MT's. I've owned an IA DP, SI Mags new and old, eD SP, seXXX, and I have a Brahma Extreme chilling around here as well.
What the XXX lacks for in BL, it makes up in displacement. It's better for relatively low frequency SPL burps and such. Also, in 97... it still wasn't the TL //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif... but I understand what you're saying. I've done a 152.1 legal with a single MT15, street B style... just for reference. And yes, I got tired of the lack of SQ with the MT... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
nG
Lawl. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifwished I knew something about tottie jawnson.... or competing.... or RE subs...
sniffle...
Loyd L.