nonsense is thinking that steel can crush concrete faster than steel can fall at free fall..nonsense is thinking thats a g/d airliner in that video..This is //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/bsflag.gif.21f42eccd34b7d1eb1608fb1b59b69c3.gif and nonsense.
Even if it weakened the steel how do you explain the near freefall collapse?//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gifI only scanned your redundant post, but I want to comment on this quick,,
When will you guys learn that it didnt have to fucking melt the steel for the building ot collapse. At even modest temperature claculations, the steel in the WTC towers would have lost well over half its integrity in that fire, add that to uneven heating and you have severely warped supports, supported by evidence at the scene. But you wont read about that on your biased conspiracy websites, you actually have to go out and do real research...
ohhh man...I just heard some shizzznit!!. I was just watching channel 7 new ABC....they were showing the Pentagon video and WOW...it does NOT look like a big plane at all. The nose of the plane isnt even taller than the 1st floor...which it should definitely be.....
BUT..............the Gov. sued someone for even questioning the theory of it being an inside job!!!!!!!!!! what is that!!!!!!......lets assume that this theory is true....nobody would even be able to challenge it, or more less bring it up!!.