The new RF power amps=sexy

[jrouter76 10+ year member]

I have to give credit when it is due,I have not been a fan of RF amps since they stopped making the DSM series,but the new T1500-1bd is the shit.It has a small footprint and it is powerful too 1500@1 ohm, what i like about it is it is small enough where you can run mutiple amps and not worrry about space plus I like the simple-sleek look, you know for me to be talking about RF amps it must have caught my eye just right here is some info: Description Value

CEA-2006 Compliant

Number of Channels 1

Rated Power

continuous power 500W x 1 @ 4-Ohms RMS

1000W x 1 @ 2-Ohms RMS

1500W x 1 @ 1-Ohm RMS

Total Power

total sum of 'rated power' 1500 Watts

Bridgeable No

Crossover Controls Low-Pass (LP): 35-250Hz 24dB/octave Butterworth

Tone Controls Bass: 0dB to +18dB @ 45Hz

Infrasonic Filter: -3dB @ 28Hz 12dB/Octave

Signal Input Low level: 1 RCA pair

Signal Output Low Level: 1 RCA pair

Power Input Connector Block

Power Wire Gauge 4 AWG

Speaker Output Connector Screw terminal barrier strip

Speaker Wire Gauge 8 AWG to 18 AWG

Heat Sink Type Cast aluminum

Cooling Convection

Remote Controls Optional Remote Punch Bass EQ

(overrides built-in Punch Bass EQ)

Visual Indicators Power

Thermal

Protect

Circuit Topology Class Class bd

Frequency Response 20Hz to 250kHz +/- 0.5dB

Shipping Weight 14.35 Lbs.

(6.50 Kg.)

Dimensions (HxWxL) 2.14 x 8.14 x 14.91 (in)

5.42 x 20.68 x 37.86 (cm)

Dimensional Diagram

Click to read more...

 

[bonesninja 5,000+ posts]

pics???

 

[nate2587 10+ year member]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/needpics.gif.edd6d28e76618c28c46f343991bcced5.gif

 

[02parkave 5,000+ posts]

http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/products/photos/T1500-1bd_1_m.jpg

old ones look ALOT better, imo (huge, though)

 

[Elton 10+ year member]

pics???

http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_8955_Rockford+Fosgate+Power+T1500-1bd.html#

 

[Decipha 10+ year member]

uhh i don't like the looks personally looks like a suitcase to me or a lunch kit

 

[Qbenjamin 10+ year member]

uhh i don't like the looks personally looks like a suitcase to me or a lunch kit

X2, looks like my air intake box.........1 word, UGLY!

 

[jrouter76 10+ year member]

uhh i don't like the looks personally looks like a suitcase to me or a lunch kit

you have to see it in person to appreciate it, very small footprint for a powerful amp to me it looks better then the last series of amps...but to each his own this just happens to be mine:

 

[02parkave 5,000+ posts]

i still VASTLY prefer the old ones...

 

[RydHy3845 10+ year member]

oogly amp..

 

[Gods_Prototype 10+ year member]

I think they look sexy as hell, I'm thinking of picking one up if the birthsheets are around or above the 2000W mark. I need about 2000W and I already have the new Power T400-4 4 channel amp. I know the old power amps the 2000W amp was more like 2800w on the birthsheets.

 

[Qbenjamin 10+ year member]

I think they look sexy as hell, I'm thinking of picking one up if the birthsheets are around or above the 2000W mark. I need about 2000W and I already have the new Power T400-4 4 channel amp. I know the old power amps the 2000W amp was more like 2800w on the birthsheets.

That's a lil far fetched to rate an amp -800w..........Try again.

 

[Gods_Prototype 10+ year member]

alright but the 4 channel power amp is rated 25W X 4 @4ohms and birthsheet is 98X4@4ohms so thats like 300% under rated, farfetched still.....

 

[Gods_Prototype 10+ year member]

But I suppose your the end all of Rockford amp knowledge right

 

[skmfkr 5,000+ posts]

wow looks ugly as **** and still nothin impressive, someone plz dlt this thread