The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

lol

 

[Lowjacker 10+ year member]

Interesting how the second you question the THEORY of evolution people get their panties all bunched up. Like their life depends on it. In my opinion it looks like this. If evolution were true then we would have written records of mans evolution from one stage to the next. Records written as the evolutions happen. Where are they?

and as for not reading darwins booklet.....I don't need to stick my hand up a cows ass to know that if I did it would smell like cow shit afterwards....I just kinda know it would......you don't have to have hands on knowledge of a book to say you don't agree with it......I know what it's about and since I don't agree with the THEORIES it states I'm pretty damn sure I wouldn't like it........

 

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

meh i dont think anybody really knows what the hell happend back in the days.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

Interesting how the second you question the THEORY of evolution people get their panties all bunched up. Like their life depends on it. In my opinion it looks like this. If evolution were true then we would have written records of mans evolution from one stage to the next. Records written as the evolutions happen. Where are they?
and as for not reading darwins booklet.....I don't need to stick my hand up a cows ass to know that if I did it would smell like cow shit afterwards....I just kinda know it would......you don't have to have hands on knowledge of a book to say you don't agree with it......I know what it's about and since I don't agree with the THEORIES it states I'm pretty damn sure I wouldn't like it........

you are an ignorant fool.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

meh i dont think anybody really knows what the hell happend back in the days.

fossil records tell us otherwise.

 

[Lowjacker 10+ year member]

you are an ignorant fool.

perhaps......but maybe not....we'll never know for sure

fossil records tell us otherwise.

really?......with carbon dating recently proven to be inaccurate how can our dating of anything be spot on?

Nobody here on the planet knows 100% for sure.........NOBODY.........what I go on is what I call faith.......

I hope your science is as fulfilling for you....if it is....good.....you live with it and be well

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

with carbon dating recently proven to be inaccurate how can our dating of anything be spot on?

Link to said studies?

 

[Termlab 10+ year member]

i'd like a link to the disproving of the accuracy of carbon dating also...

p.s. i believe in a "higher power" that created the universe and possibly even set in motion evolution....

the secrets of the universe arent mine to know, so i wont try and figure them out. but IF there is a supreme being, i'd like to be on his good side when i die.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

perhaps......but maybe not....we'll never know for sure


really?......with carbon dating recently proven to be inaccurate how can our dating of anything be spot on?

Nobody here on the planet knows 100% for sure.........NOBODY.........what I go on is what I call faith.......

I hope your science is as fulfilling for you....if it is....good.....you live with it and be well

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

prove it. wait you dont need to, fossil records found on excavations of the same specie with burried in different layers of the earth with every organism in a different layer having some slight variation proves change over time, no carbon dating needed.

 

[Dozy_production 10+ year member]

2. If the first human pair lived 100,000 years ago (a period much less than evolution required), what would be the present population at the same low rate of increase? Answer: 4,660,210,253,138,204,000; or 2,527,570,733 times as many as are living now.

But that doesnt account for, wars, plagues, disease, famine, droughts, *******, and the mere fact that people dont reproduce at the same rate, wether it being higher or lower. I think a lot of these points havent been well thought out IMO.

In the past arguements on this subject on this forum ive been seeing that the creationists' arguements have been black and white. You cant just scientifically prove that the theory of evolution is wrong by pitching up a wacky equation and not considering the million of possible inputs into this equation.

If your going to argue about religion and how you can scientifically disprove the theory of evolution here are some rules:

1) if your arguement fails, dont use the old, "faith" get away

2) If your going to say things like carbon dating are inaccurate then provide the proof.

3) stop hating gays.

I'm agnostic, or perhaps aethiest. I really have been getting turned away from the christian church lately. Ive heard so much hate from these people that are supposed to advocate peace. Of course thats what every religion is all about, and i think there are a majority of rotten apples who have lost the true meaning of what they believe in.

Oh and if your not going to consider both sides of the arguement then GTFO. American Media FTL.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

on the galapagos islands darwin physically watched the beaks on the finches evolve QUOTE]
Anyone who listens to bri please keep in mind that he is the same fool who made the above statement.

 

[Dozy_production 10+ year member]

on the galapagos islands darwin physically watched the beaks on the finches evolve QUOTE]
Anyone who listens to bri please keep in mind that he is the same fool who made the above statement.

dude dont make this political and smeer Bri. Is this all you have to say to save your arguement?

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

dude dont make this political and smeer Bri. Is this all you have to say to save your arguement?

DUDE, WTF are you talking about?? What argument do you think I am trying to save??

Bri made that statement, which at the very best is poorly worded, and I asked him about it. Rather than retract or clarify the statement he acted like a punk.

We know you are up his ***, what is up yours?

 

[Dozy_production 10+ year member]

DUDE, WTF are you talking about?? What argument do you think I am trying to save??

Bri made that statement, which at the very best is poorly worded, and I asked him about it. Rather than retract or clarify the statement he acted like a punk.

We know you are up his ***, what is up yours?

ill say it again. Dont smeer anyone to save your arguement. Might as well call me a nazi because you are done here.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

on the galapagos islands darwin physically watched the beaks on the finches evolve QUOTE]
Anyone who listens to bri please keep in mind that he is the same fool who made the above statement.

ok homeboy, he documented change in the finch population on the galapagos islands.