The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved

[Zerim 10+ year member]

This conversation in my eyes proves evolution. A once mentally dominated and controlled species has now evovled to question everything. Now we just need to get rid of politics and we will be set.

 

[pwnt by pat 10+ year member]

I read nothing in those figures about population decay rate.

 

[AphexTwin 10+ year member]

That list of so called facts is the biggest pile of $hit i have ever seen.

 

[GemaRastem 10+ year member]

darwin+evolution ftw

 

[ssj2xxgotenxx 10+ year member]

Keep in mind it's called the, "Theroy of Evolution." It's a educated explination based on scientific data, but is still being revised and re-analyized constantly. In no way does it suggest it is the one and only explination for the progresson or existance of mankind. Atleast the Theroy of Evolution has some plausible scientific explination as compared to the fairytale known as religion.... but that's another story for another thread.

 

[AphexTwin 10+ year member]

1. If the first human pair lived 2,000,000 years ago, as the evolutionists claim, and the population has doubled itself in every 1612.51 years (one-tenth the Jewish rate of net increase), what would be the present population of the globe? Answer: 18,932,139,737,991 followed by 360 figures; or 18, 932,139,737,991 decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion decillion, decillion, decillion, decillion; or 18,932,139,i37,991 vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion, vigintillion.

First off the "claim" that the population doubles every 1,600 years is erroneous. Population increase is logarithmic, not static and changes with time. The world's current (overall as well as natural) growth rate is about 1.14%, representing a doubling time of 61 years. Also what average life span are they using to come up with that number? Seems to me that they think people dont die and keep adding the number up?

3. At the above rate of increase how many human beings would have survived in the 517i years since Noah? Answer: 9. How many Jews, in the 3850 years since Jacob's marriage? Answer: 5.

Wow, and according to the bible how long did noah live? Answer: 600 years

Humans that have lived that long? Answer: Absoutley NONE!

I could go on and on but this is ridiculous.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

why does it have to be black or white? why not somewhere in the 'gray' area.....
Maybe GOD (creationism) clapped his hands together and, sounding a large BOOM, (evolution) thusly creating Man-kind as we know it?

and why are humans so gullible?

because we have physical evidence proving that we evolved into what we are now.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

I read nothing in those figures about population decay rate.

its called AIDS. the population is decreasing in Japan (i ithink) as of right now. it is just because of women having more power to make choices for themselves, and individuals tend to focus more on their career and have children later in life. but this is a recent trend, so until you give it a few years the population will continue to decrease. look at the population age pyramid and its all laid out for you.

 

[AphexTwin 10+ year member]

Keep in mind it's called the, "Theroy of Evolution." It's a educated explination based on scientific data, but is still being revised and re-analyized constantly. In no way does it suggest it is the one and only explination for the progresson or existance of mankind. Atleast the Theroy of Evolution has some plausible scientific explination as compared to the fairytale known as religion.... but that's another story for another thread.

Keep in mind that it's still a theory that the earth revolves around the sun too. It means that it has not been disproven by way of the scientific method. By all scientific accounts the theory (make sure you spell it right next time) of evolution is the best "guess" as to how living things evolve. Darwin proposed that by means of natural selection living things evolve and within the scientific community that idea hasnt been disproved yet, so we accept it as our best guess as to how things in the natural world behave. Until the time that someone propose's a better more defined view of the natural process' that shape the outcome of life, then we are merely speculating and that falls into a different category than science.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

darwin+evolution ftw

darwin is the man. bottom line.

his book, "the origin of species" wasnt even going to get published. he didnt like controversy, he was struggling with his religous convictions (he studied to be a priest), and he was still unsure of himself because he wasnt sure how variation in the specie got into the population (which we can now prove due to technology). it wasnt until another man, alfred russel wallace, sent darwin a manuscript in the mail for him to look over. wallace independantly came up with the same concept as darwin, and this forced him to publish his work in 1858. together wallace and darwin did a joint publication. soon after wallace dissappeared.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

Keep in mind that it's still a theory that the earth revolves around the sun too. It means that it has not been disproven by way of the scientific method. By all scientific accounts the theory (make sure you spell it right next time) of eveolution is the best "guess" as to how living things evolve. Darwin proposed that by means of natural selection living things evolve and within the scientific community that idea hasnt been disproved yet, so we accept it as our best guess as to how things in the natural world behave. Until the time that someone propose's a better more defined view of the natural process's that shape the outcome of life, then we are merely speculating and that falls into a different category than science.

evolution is a very very appearent process. it is no theory, it is the process in which it happens. modern technology supplied the scientific evidence of evolution.

 

[mannyb18b]

Bri for President?

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

Bri for President?

of the world?

 

[thatsgonnahurt 10+ year member]

well i'm not going to depend on evolution to make me an audio system for my car. i'm going to buy one that is well thought out and manufactured within close tolerances to work in the car environment.

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

I like animals //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif