The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

why would i read a book about a topic i disagree with?

and if everything people throw out is random then i say the book by charles darwin is a random book of fiction and i chose not to believe it......

you can believe what you want and i will believe what i want......

all i'm saying is that for your sake...i hope you're right

you cant push a legitimate arguement if you dont know both sides of the equation.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

in a human example that follows your pc example. barry bonds. huge guy due to steroids and working out. in no way did his genetics change, so therefore it wouldnt be passed down to his offspring. not genetics. try harder next time.

Perhaps...but could the steriods not affect his sperm and alter genes that way? Although such alterations usally create mentally handicapped rather than superheros.

 

[Lowjacker 10+ year member]

What if the changes are more subtle? What if there is no need for such drastic changes. If we went into an ice age again, then species would change and adapt. I think it is a series of very small changes is what causes evolution, not giant leaps. Also, humans circumvent the whole process by using medicine to cure the sick and helping animals and whatnot.

What if there never was an ice age?

What if everything that has been attributed to the ice age happened during the Great Flood?.....water is water and can do many strange things in all its forms

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

Perhaps...but could the steriods not affect his sperm and alter genes that way? Although such alterations usally create mentally handicapped rather than superheros.

no, a chemical change wont alter his DNA. yes, it could complicate during reproduction, but still isnt evolution. it wont be an evolved human specie as much as it would be a drug baby.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

And, therefore, Christians in general are also gullible ...

ALL generalizations are false.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

for those of you more interested, read "the origin of species", then read todays views of evolution and come up with a theory of your own, dont just throw some random stuff out there and call yourself an expert.

I would not think of it.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

no, a chemical change wont alter his DNA. yes, it could complicate during reproduction, but still isnt evolution. it wont be an evolved human specie as much as it would be a drug baby.

Correct...the result wouldn't be on a 'mass enough scale' to constitute evolution, however some people think the amounts of perservatives and other synthetics in our food are causing us to be excessively tall or live excessively long lives. I don't know if that would be considered evolution as a) it did not occur naturally and b) is it on a mass enough scale to say the species has indeed changed.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

I would not think of it.

thy shall not thinks of it? stfu and dont try to sound smart.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

Correct...the result wouldn't be on a 'mass enough scale' to constitute evolution, however some people think the amounts of perservatives and other synthetics in our food are causing us to be excessively tall or live excessively long lives. I don't know if that would be considered evolution as a) it did not occur naturally and b) is it on a mass enough scale to say the species has indeed changed.

and it isnt geographically distributed.

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

and on a side note, that isnt scientifically disproving something. if you want to challenge something this big, it darn well better be a scienific law, and if it was a scientific appoach to it, it would be on the front page of the worlds biggest newspapers.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

and it isnt geographically distributed.

But weren't Darwin's finches geographically seperated and acquired different traits or are you saying we are not seperated enough?

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

thy shall not thinks of it? stfu and dont try to sound smart.

While you guys are at it, why don't you try to figure out how little homosexuals like bri fit into the evolutionary equation.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

That would mean the generalization that all generalizations are false is also false ...

BINGO

 

[FoxPro5 5,000+ posts]

bri487, you need to respect more peoples ideas and opinions. When you call other people stupid and tell them to stfu, it really says a lot about your character. People will challenge your posts, learn to live with it or don't post in the first place!!!

 

[bri487 5,000+ posts]

But weren't Darwin's finches geographically seperated and acquired different traits or are you saying we are not seperated enough?

not isolated enough. on the galapagos islands darwin physically watched the beaks on the finches evolve into something more fit for the diet proved on the islands. the birds had no competition and no native forms on the islands. the only competition they had was between themselves. the fittest of the bunch lasted through time and a finch with the beak of the fittest became the specie. i believe there were 13 different species of finches that were originally carried to the islands through the trade winds. that is a classic example of adaptive radiation. 2 pts for me.