Split coil Fi? Sexiness!

[revrider1 5,000+ posts]

Nice...

 

[PioneerSPL1990 10+ year member]

Just saw these. Here for who hasn't, pretty sweet.

i want.

 

[SPLaudio 5,000+ posts]

few things.

why wasnt the middle section machined as 1 piece?

how many motors do you want to stack before it becomes useless?

air flow in the box is going to be affected bigtime.

wouldnt this benifit FAR more using neo?

is this going to attach to a cast IRON basket?

there is alot of moving mass and what is going on to prevent the former from breaking/crushing?

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Im intrigued.

 

[Kyle_Keating 10+ year member]

how is this different than isobaric with two drivers?

 

[gtbike900 10+ year member]

i want it

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

how is this different than isobaric with two drivers?

How would this be even remotely close to isobaric with 2 drivers?

Both motor assemblies drive one former and one cone.

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

How would this be even remotely close to isobaric with 2 drivers?
Both motor assemblies drive one former and one cone.

Different moving mass also?

 

[Kyle_Keating 10+ year member]

How would this be even remotely close to isobaric with 2 drivers?
Both motor assemblies drive one former and one cone.

that's exactly what isobaric is dooood.

two motors... one cone

sounds like a dirty video i have seen...

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

that's exactly what isobaric is dooood.
two motors... one cone

sounds like a dirty video i have seen...

Yes, but those two motors drive the cone in opposite directions, yes?

Besides, all the isobaric designs I've seen involved two separate speakers, not one cone.

 

[ciaonzo 5,000+ posts]

Yes, but those two motors drive the cone in opposite directions, yes?

No. Ideally, the two cones would be facing each other and they would have the smallest possible amount of airspace between them and be air tight. Two motors on one cone. Even then, the only purpose of it back then was to cut down on enclosure size, but in the configuration I just described, you get a reduction in harmonic distortion as well. In theory anyway.

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

No. Ideally, the two cones would be facing each other and they would have the smallest possible amount of airspace between them and be air tight. Two motors on one cone. Even then, the only purpose of it back then was to cut down on enclosure size, but in the configuration I just described, you get a reduction in harmonic distortion as well. In theory anyway.

Check my edited post above.

Regardless, the motors are mounted opposite of one another, not in parallel.

 

[ciaonzo 5,000+ posts]

Check my edited post above.
Regardless, the motors are mounted opposite of one another, not in parallel.

Yep, I get what you're sayin'.

This is probably not quite the same as isobaric. I would love to see a cross section view.

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

Yep, I get what you're sayin'.
This is probably not quite the same as isobaric. I would love to see a cross section view.

Wouldn't we all. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[ciaonzo 5,000+ posts]

I can't quite understand how the circuit works. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

And why aren't the gaps heights the same? It appears as though the top gap is shorter than the middle gap. So are the separate coils the same height?